Exam 2 Flashcards
experimental research design
- used for the purpose of examining causality
- researchers actively manipulate the independent variable to determine its effect on the dependent variable
- involve randomization and control groups
nonexperimental research design
-used for the purpose of describing a phenomenon in detail, explaining relationships and differences among variables, and predicting relationships and differences among variables
causality
relationship between a cause and its effect
probability
likelihood or chance that an event will occur in a situation
control
ability to manipulate, regulate, or statistically adjust for the multitude of factors that can influence the dependent variable
extraneous variables
factors that interfere with the relationship between the independent and dependent variables; confounding variable; Z variable
bias
extraneous variables influence the relationship btwn the independent and dependent variables
randomization
the selection, assignment, or arrangement of elements by chance
random sampling
technique for selecting elements whereby each has the same chance of being selected
random assignment
assignment technique in which subjects have an equal chance of being in either the treatment or the control group
between-groups design
study design where two groups of subjects can be compared
within-groups design
comparisons are made about the same subjects at two or more points in time or on two or more measures
study validity
ability to accept results as logical, reasonable, and justifiable based on the evidence presented
internal validity
degree to which one can conclude that the independent variable produced changes in the dependent variable
selection bias
- threat to internal validity that occurs when the change in the DV is a result of differences in the characteristics of subjects before they entered a study rather than a result of the IV
- can be minimized somewhat by the use of random assignment to groups
threats
forces that can change the result of a study
history
- threat to internal validity
- occurs when the DV may have been influenced by some event other than the IV that occurred during the course of the study
maturation
- threat to internal validity
- when subects change by growing or maturing
testing
- threat to internal validity
- when a pretest influences the way subjects respond to a post test
instrumentation
- threat to internal validity
- when there are inconsistencies in data collection
mortality
- threat to internal validity
- when there is a loss of subjects before the study is completed; attrition rate
attrition rate
dropout rate; loss of subjects before the study is completed
statistical conclusion validity
the degree that the results of the statistical analysis reflect the true relationship among the independent and dependent variables
type II error
when researchers inaccurately conclude that there is no relationship among the independent and dependent variables when an actual relationship does exist; when the researcher accepts the null when it should have been rejected
external validity
the degree to which the results of a study can be generalized to other subjects, settings, and times
construct validity
- threat to external validity
- when the instrument does not accurately measure the theoretical concepts
confounding
- threat associated with construct validity
- means there is a possible error in interpretation of the results
- occurs when experiemental controls do not allow the researcher to eliminate possible alternative explanations for the relationship between the IV and the DV
reactivity
the influence of participating in a study on the responses of subjects; hawthorne effect
hawthorne effect
subject’s behaviors may be affected by personal values or desires to please the experimenter; reactivity
effects of selection
threats to external validity when the sample does not represent the popluation
interaction of treatment with selection of subjects
- threat to external validity
- the independent variable might not affect individuals the same way
interaction of treatment and setting
- threat to external validity
- an intervention conducted in one setting cannot be generalized to a different setting
interactions of treatment and history
- threat to external validity
- historical events affect the intervention
retrospective designs
research designs when researchers look back in time to determine possible causative factors; ex post facto
ex post facto
research design in which researchers look back in time to determine causative factors; retrospective design
case-control
retrospective study in which researchers begin with a group of people who already had the disease; studies that compare two groups: those who have a specific condition and those who do not have the condition
cross-sectional
nonexperiemental design used to gather data from a group of subjects at only one point in time; study design to measure exposure and disease as each exists in a population or representative sample at one specific point in time
cohort comparison
nonexperimental cross-sectional design in which more than one group is studied at the same time so that conclusions about a variable over time can be drawn without spending as much time
longitudinal designs
designs used to gather data about subjects at more than one point in time
prospective designs
studies over time with presumed causes that follow subjects to determine whether the hypothesized effects actually occur
panel designs
longitudinal design were the same subjects, drawn from the general population, provide data at multiple points in time
trend
longitudinal design to gather data from different samples across time