Exam 2 Flashcards
What are the key insights of nuclear optimism?
Nukes make leaders more reasonable and nukes explain why there hasn’t been a world war since 1945
What policy do nuclear optimists support?
More nuclear weapons for more stability
What are the three approaches that nuclear pessimists say increase the risk of instability?
Risk of irrational leadership, even rational leaders will consider nuclear war, and there are inherent risks in large organizations
What did nuclear pessimists believe about Donald Trump?
His impulsive personality was a danger
Why might rational leaders consider nuclear war?
Assumption enemy is preparing for war, assumption some nuclear war scenarios are better than others, assumption using nukes is still better than being invaded, need to defend your credibility
What is a nuclear crisis?
A standoff between two nuclear powered state
What are inherent risks with large organizations?
Goals and identities, reliance on routines, impact of politics on organizations
Why are militaries more interested in preventative nuclear war?
They see war as likely in the near term and inevitable in the long run, they have less inhibitions towards using violence, they are offensive minded, and they only focus on the war
How are large organizations in general prone to accident?
Objectives can trump safety, complex procedures, denial, deflect blame and minimize problems, and political leaders are often unaware of what they do
How is the risk of accidents higher in developing countries?
They have insufficient resources, privilege opacity, have limited experience with nukes, and often have domestic instability
What are the six ways nukes can impact a states policy?
More aggressive policies, more ambitious policies, more independence from a powerful ally, nurture an alliance at a lesser cost, more resistance in nuclear crises, and better ability to compromise
What does it mean to have a more aggressive policy?
More conventional forces deployed, more belligerent rhetoric, greater tolerance for escalation
What does it mean to have a more ambitious policy?
Forge new alliances and make new commitments
What is an example of a more ambitious policy made?
The US making long term security commitments in Western Europe
What does it mean to have more independence from a powerful ally?
Less consultations with the ally, less concessions with the ally, growing readiness to challenge the ally’s domination
What is an example of a state becoming more independent from an ally?
France withdrawing from NATO integrated command structure in 1996
How can nukes nurture an alliance at a lesser cost?
It is less expensive than deploying massive troop numbers
What is an example of nukes nurturing an alliance?
China providing a bomb design for Pakistan
How can nukes lead to more resistance during nuclear crises?
If you have nukes, you can defend your interests more staunchly during a crisis
What is an example of nukes leading to more resistance during a crisis?
During India-Pakistan crises, Pakistan could resist India’s pressures for much longer
How do nukes lead to a better ability to compromise?
Nukes make you feel secure and bolster your self-esteem, so they may make you more willing to compromise
How did developing the nuke change the British policy?
Britain was able to reduce its conventional power without losing credibility, they helped Britain bolster its junior allies, and emboldened them against the US
What is arms control?
Restrictions on the development/use of nukes and missiles
What is nonproliferation?
Efforts to stem the spread of nukes
What is nuclear disarmament?
Reducing or dismantling nuclear weapons
What did the Acheson/Lillenthal report say? (March 1946)
The monopoly the US had on nuclear weapons would not last forever, there is porosity between civilian and military nuclear programs, and its impossible to build a credible international inspection system, so proliferation is inevitable
What were the principles of the atoms for peace?
The US would provide nuclear energy to other states in exchange for the promise states would never develop nukes
Why did the US start the atoms for peace project?
To help the third world and discourage recipient states from developing nukes
When was the International Atomic Energy Agency created?
1957
Why was the IAEA created?
To monitor the atoms for peace agreements and nuclear exports
What did the US believe about nonproliferation until the 60s?
US leaders had time and underestimated third world countries, were unsure nonproliferation was feasible
What led to growing momentum for nonproliferation?
Pressure from grassroots antinuclear groups, US/Soviet crises in Berlin and Cuba, a report that there would be 8 new nuclear states by 1973, and China’s nuclear test
Why was the US concerned about a Chinese nuclear weapon?
Fear of use, fear of Chinese nuclear blackmail, fear of proliferation dominoes
When was the arms control and disarmament agency created?
1961
When was the Gilpatric report created?
1965
What did the Gilpatric report say?
We are close to a point of nuclear no return and the US needs to act fast
When was the nonproliferation treaty created?
1968
What were the obligations for nuclear weapons states who signed the NPT?
No transfer of nukes to other states, no assistance for manufacturing/acquiring nukes, assistance in nuclear energy for peaceful purpose, try to disarm at some point
What are the obligations in the NPT for nonnuclear states?
Never develop nukes and accept international safeguards and inspections
Why were third world signatories of the NPT skeptical?
They thought the main threat wasn’t new nuclear weapon states, but the thousands of nukes the superpowers were building, they did not trust nuclear weapons states to disarm, they thought the NPT would put them in a permanent low position, and this triggered accusations the nuclear order was racist
How many states are signatories to the NPT?
191
What was America’s bilateral response to Indian nuclear tests?
More safeguard mechanisms on the sale of US nuclear reactors abroad, using the appeal of tech assistance to get more states to join the NPT, attempting to disrupt the civilian nuclear tech transfers in other states and strengthen the arsenal of sanctions
How did the use add more stringent safeguard mechanisms on its sales of US reactors abroad?
By cancelling the contracts to states that did not meet the standards
Why did Italy join the NPT (April 1975)?
The US offered civilian nuclear assistance
Who were potential buyers the US saw as a threat to nonproliferation?
Brazil, South Korea, and Pakistan
Who were the potential sellers the US saw as a threat to nonproliferation?
France and West Germany
What were the Symington/Glenn amendments (1976/1977)?
Threats to terminate US assistance to any state that exported or received nuclear tech in violation of IAEA safeguards
What is a multilateral response?
A response in cooperation with other states/organizations
When was the Nuclear Suppliers Group created?
April 1975
What was the intent of the Nuclear Suppliers Group?
To prevent the export of sensitive nuclear materials to states that did not have full IAEA safeguards
When was the missile technology control regime (MTCR) created?
April 1987
Why was the MTCR created?
To limit the proliferation of missile technology and unmanned vehicles that could be used for nuclear/chemical/biological attacks
When was the model additional protocol created?
May 1997
What did the model additional protocol do?
Make more stringent IAEA safeguards and more sweeping inspections
What is the problem with the literature on nonproliferation according to Gavin?
It underestimates the importance the US gave to nonproliferation
What does the literature wrongly say about US commitment to nonproliferation?
Nonproliferation was a post Cold War goal, inconsistent and selective, narrowly focused on rogue state, and driven by norms and ideals
What were the two goals of nonproliferation, according to Gavin?
Prevent the rise of independent nuclear forces and reverse/mitigate the consequences of proliferation
What were the legal/normative strategies the US used towards proliferation?
Rhetoric against nukes and treaties/institutions
What were the coercive strategies the US used against proliferation?
Sanctions, sabotage, threats of abandonment, and the consideration of preventive nuclear strikes
What were the assurance strategies the US used against proliferation?
Conventional arms sales and security umbrella
What were the mitigation strategies the US used ?
Prevent the final development/acquisition of nukes, convince existing nuclear states to disarm, prevent the development/acquisition of new missiles, and prevent new nuclear tests
Why was the US deeply committed to nonproliferation?
Minimize the risk of nuclear attack on the US, minimize the risk of being drawn in nuclear cerises, protect capacity to project conventional military power, maintain leverage over allies, prevent unstable weak states from being emboldened, minimize risk of accidents/theft
Why do some scholars say the US wasn’t as committed to nonproliferation?
The US policies were inconsistent
Why did the atoms for peace project have an impact on proliferation in a negative way?
Created technological momentum in many states, sent a bad signal to potential suppliers, sent a bad signal to the Soviet Union
Why were Nixon and Kissinger ambiguous on proliferation?
In 1969, they prevented a Soviet strike on Chinese nuclear facilities and informed Japan they would understand if they developed nukes. In 1973 they told the French president they support the European nuclear effort
Why is Israel an important case of nuclear proliferation?
They are a small country the US could have stopped, happened during the rise of nonproliferation, and Israel is central to Middle Eastern instability
What did Kennedy do about Israel’s proliferation?
He acknowledge Israel could develop a nuke if they wanted to, but did nothing
What did Johnson do about Israel’s nuclear program?
The US inspected a facility in Dimona, but he reassured Israel they could ignore US pressures, had superficial inspections, and did not consider security guarantees to disincentivize Israel
What did Nixon say about Israel’s nuke?
Acceptance, but asked Israel not to conduct a nuclear test and not to acknowledge
Why was US nonproliferation policy on Israel so inconsistent?
They were unwilling to break ties with an ally, pro-Israel forces in the US domestic political system, perception nuclear Israel may be more moderate, perception Israel nuke may reduce risk of US involvement in a major war in the Middle East
Why do technologically advanced states give nuclear assistance to other states?
Economic interests as well as strategic interests like an alliance or access to local resources
In what ways did the US pressure Pakistan not to develop nukes?
April 6, 1979: suspended all assistance to Islamabad
Why did the US start to support Pakistans nuclear ambitions?
After the Soviets invaded Afghanistan
What did Reagan do about Pakistan’s nuclear program?
In June 1981, he gave them a $3.2 B aid program, under the condition they would not test
What was the impact of the US reducing its commitment to nonproliferation in Pakistan?
Pakistan accelerated its nuclear program, China upgraded its nuclear assistance to Pakistan, and India launched a ballistic missile program
When did the US resume nonproliferation goals on Pakistan?
1989, when the soviets withdrew from Afghanistan
What was the overall conclusion of skeptics of the US commitment to nonproliferation?
Nonpro was often on the minds of leaders and the US had important successes, but it was inconsistent and those policies had consequences
What are sanctions?
International instruments of statecraft that punish or deny benefits to leaders, rulers, coalitions, or broader constituencies in a given state to dissuade those targets from pursuing nuclear weapons
What are the traditional problems with sanctions?
Require widespread support internationally to be credible, limited impact if the commitment to nukes is deep, and they impact the people of a country more than the leaders
Why do some scholars believe sanctions are more effective than commonly believed?
Other scholars concentrate on cases of actual sanctions, when they should focus on the threat of sanctions as well
What happened when the US threatened Taiwan with sanctions in 1976/1977?
Taiwan complied before sanctions could be imposed
What happened in South Korea when the U.S. threatened sanctions in 1975/1976?
They canceled their plans before any sanctions