Exam 2 Flashcards
Descartes reasons for doubting senses
sometimes your senses may deceive you and therefore cannot be trusted (if the source of a belief is unreliable, then you must doubt the belief)
arguments for illusions
illusions can make you see things that are not truly there which further proves that senses should be doubted
arguments for dreams
if you cannot rule out the possibility that you are dreaming, then your sensory beliefs are unjustified
descartres reason for doubting reason
reason could be doubted because an all powerful figure might deceive you
arguments for evil demon/genius
if an all powerful figure is constantly deceiving us (anything that we believe is actually false), how can we come to the conclusion that we are being deceived. being that we cannot be sure of anything (or know anything)
role of skeptical scenarios in doubt
for your sensory beliefs, you cannot rule out all the skeptical scenarios, which means that you do not know things via the senses
role of certainty in existence in doubt
in terms of dreams you are essentially creating your own reality… therefore whats to say that your reality isn’t a dream (essentially your existence is uncertain)
role of god’s existence in doubt
descartes tries to prove that God exists but if God is omnipotent then he would not allow constant deception
necessary conditions
a condition that must obtain for the concept to apply (a is a necessary condition for B if B can only happen with A occurring). specifying necessary conditions does not guarantee that something will happen but is necessary for it to occur
sufficient conditions
a condition that suffices for the concept to apply (a is a sufficient condition for B if the occurrence of A ensures the occurrence of B) sufficient conditions guarantees the truth of the condition but is not necessary for the condition to occur
traditional analysis
in order for something to be true there needs to be both necessary and sufficient conditions
justification
justification qualifies a belief as knowledge (S know that P if P is true, S believes that P, and S is justified in believing that P) justification must be met for knowledge to be a true belief
gettier cases
proves that the definition of knowledge is insufficient. essentially S can believe P (P can be true and S can be justified in believing that P) but still not have any knowledge of it (refutes JTB theory)
ex. Smith has knowledge that Jones has a ford and believes Jones is in Barcelona (this is believed, true, and justified) but is it knowledge if he hasn’t seen Jones (he sold his car) and hasn’t seen Brown for days (although he is in barcelona)
JTB theory
knowledge is equivalent to a true belief if justification, truth and belief are met
mind body problem
bodies are material and minds are immaterial, but material things do not interact with immaterial things and bodies and minds do interact