Exam 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Descartes reasons for doubting senses

A

sometimes your senses may deceive you and therefore cannot be trusted (if the source of a belief is unreliable, then you must doubt the belief)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

arguments for illusions

A

illusions can make you see things that are not truly there which further proves that senses should be doubted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

arguments for dreams

A

if you cannot rule out the possibility that you are dreaming, then your sensory beliefs are unjustified

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

descartres reason for doubting reason

A

reason could be doubted because an all powerful figure might deceive you

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

arguments for evil demon/genius

A

if an all powerful figure is constantly deceiving us (anything that we believe is actually false), how can we come to the conclusion that we are being deceived. being that we cannot be sure of anything (or know anything)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

role of skeptical scenarios in doubt

A

for your sensory beliefs, you cannot rule out all the skeptical scenarios, which means that you do not know things via the senses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

role of certainty in existence in doubt

A

in terms of dreams you are essentially creating your own reality… therefore whats to say that your reality isn’t a dream (essentially your existence is uncertain)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

role of god’s existence in doubt

A

descartes tries to prove that God exists but if God is omnipotent then he would not allow constant deception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

necessary conditions

A

a condition that must obtain for the concept to apply (a is a necessary condition for B if B can only happen with A occurring). specifying necessary conditions does not guarantee that something will happen but is necessary for it to occur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

sufficient conditions

A

a condition that suffices for the concept to apply (a is a sufficient condition for B if the occurrence of A ensures the occurrence of B) sufficient conditions guarantees the truth of the condition but is not necessary for the condition to occur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

traditional analysis

A

in order for something to be true there needs to be both necessary and sufficient conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

justification

A

justification qualifies a belief as knowledge (S know that P if P is true, S believes that P, and S is justified in believing that P) justification must be met for knowledge to be a true belief

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

gettier cases

A

proves that the definition of knowledge is insufficient. essentially S can believe P (P can be true and S can be justified in believing that P) but still not have any knowledge of it (refutes JTB theory)
ex. Smith has knowledge that Jones has a ford and believes Jones is in Barcelona (this is believed, true, and justified) but is it knowledge if he hasn’t seen Jones (he sold his car) and hasn’t seen Brown for days (although he is in barcelona)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

JTB theory

A

knowledge is equivalent to a true belief if justification, truth and belief are met

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

mind body problem

A

bodies are material and minds are immaterial, but material things do not interact with immaterial things and bodies and minds do interact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

body is material and mind is immaterial

A

bodies are physical properties (subject to physical laws) minds are an element of a person (it does not have a location, mass or shape)

they do interact because when you try to understand a joke (mind) you laugh (body)

17
Q

idealism

A

rejection that bodies are material because we could hold that the whole world is in our minds

18
Q

ephenomenalism

A

rejects interaction of body and mind (mental effects have mental causes and physical effects have physical causes or mental events have physical causes but not the other way around

19
Q

interactionist dualism

A

rejects that the material do not immaterial interact. holds that there is an interaction between material and immaterial at least with mind/body problem

20
Q

arguments for dualism

A

religion: major religions are committed to the notion of an immortal soul, if there is an immortal soul then dualism is true
introspection: when we focus on our consciousness, we perceive thought and feelings rather than the actual process, therefore thoughts and feelings are immaterial (if thoughts are immaterial and our brain processes are material then dualism is true)
irreducibility: the way you smell something is a mental phenomenon but it cannot be fully explained by physical processes, therefore mental phenomenon are physical phenomenon
parapsychology: some people can read other’s minds but there is no explanation for telepathy, if there is no explanation then the mind is immaterial and separate from the brain

21
Q

identity theory

A

idea that the mind is identical to the brain (individual mental states and processes are identical to individual brain states and processes)
ex. pain is identical to c-fibers firing, but does that mean nothing can be pain unless c-fibers are firing
chauvinism: mind=brain, then it is impossible to have a mind without a brain (robot?)

22
Q

functionalism

A

mental states are identified by their functional role not by their physical properties

23
Q

searle’s chinese room experiment

A

person in chinese room does the same thing that a computer does (correlates sets to associate meanings of symbols) if the computer understands outputted conversation, so does the person. if the person does not understand then neither does the computer. computers do not think

24
Q

computer programs cannot understand meaning

A

a computer program will simply associate a meaning with something but does not truly understand it (there are no internal processes occurring)

25
Q

challenges towards building artificial mind

A

artificial minds are capable of stealing your jobs (working jobs we tend to work, but this can increase efficiency and shorten work week), killing you (cannot tell between good and bad guys), and replacing humans in general ( A.I.s will be better and faster than humans especially at creating A.I. to the point where humans can no longer comprehend A.I.’s)

26
Q

materialism

A

everything can be explained in terms of matter

27
Q

challenge of subjunctive experience to materialism

A

we can know everything about bats (internal processes) but we will never truly know what it feels like to be a bat. therefore explanation of being something in terms of matter doesn’t mean we truly know/understand it.

28
Q

qualia

A

properties of experience

29
Q

knowledge arguments against materialism

A

if materialism is true, then you know everything relative to a claim. if you learn something from a claim then you do not know everything relative to the claim. therefore materialism is false

30
Q

difference between qualitative and quantitative identity

A

quantitative identity is having two things that are exactly the same are distinctly two different things (clark kent and superman are two different identities but same individual)
qualitative identity is referring to two distinct objects as identical (different colored ties are different object but are still all ties)

31
Q

different views of personal identity

A

body view: we are identical to our bodies (when the body dies, so do we) but if this is true then we cannot switch bodies (this is possible)
mind view: we are fundamentally minds (we could survive death of the body as long as the mind is transferred to a different body) but if your mind is copied which one is your mind if they are both you
soul view: we are fundamentally souls (survives on its own after the death of the body) but if true then judgements about personal identities are not justified

32
Q

combination views

A

with any combination involving body once the body dies it is only the other that survives (wouldn’t it just be simply mind or soul view)