Exam 1 Study Guide Flashcards
historicism vs presentism
historicism is the study of the past for its own sake
presentism is interpreting and evaluating historical events in terms of contemporary knowledge and standards
zeitgeist approach
the defining spirit or mood of a particular period of history as shown by the ideas and beliefs of the time
the great-person approach to historiography
empathizes the works of individuals such as Plato, Aristotle, Descartes, Darwin, or Freud.
Ralph Waldo Emerson (1841-1981) embraced the great-person approach to history, saying that history “resolves itself very easily into the biography of a few stout and earnest persons.”
historical development approach
showing how various individuals or events contributed to changes in an idea or connect through the years
for example, one could focus on how the idea of mental illness has changed throughout history
historiography
the study of the proper way to record history.
there are often no final answers to the questions this topic raises
what is the problem with viewing psychology as a science that started in the late 19th century in Germany?
1) it ignores the vast philosophical heritage that molded psychology into the tump of science that it eventually became
2) it omits important aspects of psychology that arose outside the realm of science
what is science? what are two major components of science?
science is the systematic attempt to rationally categorize or explain empirical observation. Popper described it as a way to rigorously test solutions to problems, while Kuhn emphasized the importance of paradigms that guide the research activities of science.
empirical observation
theory
rationalism
the theory that reason rather than experience is the foundation of certainty in knowledge.
empiricism
maintains that the source of knowledge is always based on sensory observation
what are the two main functions of scientific theory?
it organizes empirical observations
it acts as a guide for future observations
scientific law
a constantly observed relationship between two or more classes of empirical events. for example, when x occurs, y also tends to occur. by stressing the lawfulness, science is proclaiming an interest in the general case rather than the particular case.
correlational laws
describe how classes of events vary together in some systematic way
for example, exercise tends to correlate positively with health. with such information, only prediction is possible. that is, if we know a person’s level of exercise, we could predict his or her health, and vice versa
causal laws
specify how events are causally related
for example, if we knew the causes of a disease, we could predict and control that disease - as preventing the causes of a disease from occurring prevents the disease from occurring
determinism
the assumption that what is being studied can be understood in terms of causal laws
the determinist assumes that everything that occurs is a function of a finite number of causes that, if these causes were known, an event could be predicted with complete accuracy
however, knowing all causes of an event is not necessary; the determinist simply assumes that they exist and that as more causes are known, predictions become more accurate
what, according to Popper, drives scientific progress?
a theory’s incorrect predictions, not its correct ones
in real scientific life theories typically contribute not by being right but by being wrong. in other words, scientific advance in theory as well as experiments tends to be built upon the successive corrections of many errors, both small and large. thus the popular notion that theory must be right to be useful is incorrect
paradigm
the entire collection of beliefs, values, techniques, and so on shared by the members of a given scientific community
can have multiple theories under a paradigm (they were more general)
the paradigm can act like blinders
what do paradigms guide?
all of the researcher’s activities, both theoretical and methodological
preparadigmatic stage
a time in which a number of competing viewpoints exist
during this period, a discipline is characterized by a number of rival camps or schools, a situation contrary to unification and that results in, essentially, random fact gathering. such circumstances continue to exist until one school succeeds in defeating its competitors and becomes a paradigm
the normal science generated by a paradigm continues until the paradigm is displaced by a new one, which int turn will generate its own normal science
paradigmatic stage
puzzle solving activity called normal science occurs
psychology is a multi-paradigmatic science
revolutionary stage
a paradigm is replaced by another paradigm
what is the difference between the Popperian view and the Kuhnian view?
Kuhn’s assessment of science stresses subjective and sociological factors, whereas Popper’s assessment stresses logic and creativity
Popper believed that there are truths about the physical world that science can approximate. In other words, Popper accepted the correspondence theory of truth. Kuhn, on the other hand, rejected this theory, saying instead that the paradigm accepted by a group of scientists creates the “reality” they explore
what characterizes a scientific discipline?
1) determinism (everything occurs for known or knowable reasons
2) empiricism vs rationalism (experience and observation vs. thought and logic)
3) the search for scientific laws (correlational laws that allow us to predict events or causal laws that allow us to predict and control events)
4) relies on public observation (publicly verifiable knowledge, replication, replication)
according to popper, what is the best status of a theory?
not yet disconfirmed
risky predictions
According to Popper, predictions that run a real risk of being incorrect. Theories that do not make risky predictions or that explain phenomena after they have already occurred are, according to Popper, not scientific.
socrates (470-399 BCE)
determinist, nativist, rationalist
known only through the writings of his student Plato
responded to the skepticism created by the sophists
disagreed with the sophists contention that there is no discernible truth beyond individual opinion. socrates believed that by examining a number of individual manifestations of a concept, the general concept itself could be defined clearly and precisely
proposed that truth can be discovered though reason and logic
the socratic method of teaching is questioning
ontology
the metaphysics dealing with the study of being
epistemology
the branch of philosophy that deals with the theory of knowledge. it is the investigation of what distinguishes justified belief from opinion
the essence
universally accepted definition of a concept
plato (427-347 BC)
dualist, nativist, determinist with forms being causes
first a disciple of socrates, came under the influence of pythagoreans
postulated the existence of an abstract world of forms or ideas that, when manifested in matter, make up the objects in the empirical world. People should have as many forms, or ideal mental representations of entities, as possible to lead each individual to a more introspective place, and therefore, a better world
the only true knowledge is that of the forms, a knowledge that can be gained only by reflecting on the innate contents of the soul. sensory experience interferes with the attainment of knowledge and should be avoided
theory of forms
plato’s contention that ultimate reality consists of abstract ideas or forms that correspond to all objects in the empirical world. knowledge of these abstractions is innate and can be attained only through introspection
everyone should have as many forms in their head as possible to lead them to the best possible outcomes in life. It’s important to make everything you do in line with what you think the form is of that thing. a stone mason, in outlining his new work, would have a form sitting in front of him, or an ideal version of what this was supposed to look like, to guide his work
people living in line with forms are those that will live the most virtuous lives
aristotle (384-322 BC)
believed sensory experience to be the basis of all knowledge
although the five senses and the common sense provided only the information from which knowledge could be derived
aristotle also believed that everting in nature had within it an entelechy (purpose) that determined its potential
rejects plato’s notion of forms to embrace tabula rasa (the blank slate)
we gain knowledge only through empirical observation
distinguished between terrestrial and celestial (earthly vs. heavenly)
nativism
the idea that mental capacities and mental structures are innate rather than acquired by learning
reminiscence theory of knowledge (Plato)
the rational soul originally existed among the forms - and it retains that knowledge
sensory information contaminates knowledge of true reality
what are the causes of knowledge? (according to Aristotle)
material cause: what a thing is made of
formal cause: the form of a thing
efficient cause: force that makes something happen, or that transforms a thing
final cause: reason or purpose for a thing to exist
dualists
believes that there are physical events and mental events. Once it is assumed that both a physical and a mental realm exist, the question becomes how the two are related.
vitalism
endorsed by Aristotle - the thought that living things are fundamentally different from nonliving things
laws of association: contiguity (Aristotle)
think of one thing, tend to think of other things experienced at the same time
laws of association: frequency (Aristotle)
the more time something is experienced, the easier it is to recall
laws of association: similarity (Aristotle)
think of one thing, I also tend to think of similar things
laws of association: contrasts (Aristotle)
think of one thing, I also tend to think of opposite things
reminiscence theory of knowledge
plato’s belief that knowledge is attained by remembering the experiences the soul had when it dwelled among the forms before entering the body
plato’s legacy
plato created a dualism that divided the human into a body, which was material and imperfect, and a mind (soul), which contained pure knowledge
sophists
a specific kind of philosopher-teacher in ancient Greece
who believed that “truth” was what people thought it to be, and were inherently skeptical of their being any formal or universal truths. To convince others that something is true, one needs effective communication skills, and it was those skills that the sophists taught
empiricism
maintains that the source of knowledge is always based on sensory observation
Aristotle’s ladder of nature
Bottom (inanimate matter) -> plants (higher and lower) -> mammals, reptiles, fish, and insects -> human (top)
early christian faith
not a single system, but was a doctrine that departed significantly from the teachings of Jesus
immediate physical world is without value; important knowledge is provided by revelation/divine authority