Exam 1 Flashcards
3 Distinctive features of qualitative research
- Inductive
- Interpretivist
- Constructionist
Inductive
With an inductive approach, research comes first and theory follows
Interpretivist
The focus is on understanding the social world via the interpretations that humans make of it
Constructionist
Social realities exist as the result of the interactions of individuals. They are not “things” that exist outside of people and their interactions
Inductive approach
From the ground up: theory is generated from research
Deductive approach
Begins from existing theories or hypotheses
Abductive
Reflects a middle ground between inductive and deductive approaches
- Collecting data about how participants see the world is the point of departure
- The theoretical account might borrow from existing literature but remains grounded in the worldview of participants
Epistemology asks the question…
How can we know the social world?
Interpretivist standpoint
We can know the social world via the interpretations that participants make of it
Positivist standpoint
- Contrasts with the interpretivist standpoint.
Assumes we can use the scientific method to determine some “universal laws” or “objective causes” of human behavior
Ontology asks…
What is the nature of the social world? What is real? What exists?
Constructionism
For constructionism, “social properties are seen as outcomes of the interactions between individuals, rather than phenomena ‘out there’ and separate from those involved in constructing them”
Steps in qualitative research
- General research question
- Selection of relevant sites and subjects
- Collection of relevant data
- Interpretation of data
- Conceptual and theoretical framework
- Tighter specification of research question
- Writing up findings and conclusions
Are words qual or quan
QUAL
Is POV of participants quan or qual
QUAL
Is researcher distant qual or quan?
QUAN
Is “theory emerges from data” quan or qual?
QUAL
Is “emphasis on process” qual or quan?
QUAL
Is “micro” quan or qual?
QUAL
Research methods in qualitative social research (categories)
- Data as observation
- Data as talk
- Data as text
Data as observation
- Ethnography
- Participant observation
Data as talk
- In-depth interviewing
- Life histories
- Focus groups
Data as text
- Archival research (texts and documents)
- Discourse and conversation analysis
- Comparative historical research
Reliability asks…
Are measures consistent?
Validity asks…
Are conclusions believable?
Replicability asks…
Is the study repeatable?
Research strategy
The general approach to research
- Qualitative
- Quantitative
Research design
The general framework for the collection and analysis of data
- Case study
- Longitudinal
- Comparative
- Cross sectional
Research method
The technique with which the data is collected
- Participant observation
- Interviews
- Focus groups
- Text-based
Cross sectional design
Looking at a sample of cases to look for patterns of association/themes
- At a single period of time
Typical forms of cross sectional design
- Survey research
- Structured observation
- Qualitative interviews
Longitudinal design
Data-gathering of the same sample that is repeated on more than one occasion over time
- Used to observe change
Is longitudinal qualitative or quantitative?
It can be BOTH
Typical forms of longitudinal design:
- Surveys
- Content analysis
- Ethnographies
- Interviews
Case study design
Detailed and intensive analysis of one case
Typical forms of case study design
- Surveys
- Ethnographies
- Interviews in a particular setting
Case studies can be both
longitudinal and comparative
Are case studies qualitative or quantitative?
They can be BOTH
Comparative design
Using the same methods to compare two ore more meaningfully contrasting cases
- Often involves cross-cultural comparisons
Is comparative design quantitative or qualitative?
Can be BOTH
Nuremberg code (1947)
A set of ethical research principles for human experimentation created by the court in US vs Brandt
Nuremberg code characteristics
- Voluntary consent
- Fruitful results for the good of society
- Avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering
- Degree of risk
- Liberty to bring the experiment to an end
4 keys to ethical social research
- No harm
- Informed consent
- Privacy
- Deception
What is considered harm?
- Physical harm
- Damaging self esteem or development
- Causing stress
- Hurting career opportunities
- Breaking confidentiality
Informed consent
Risks and benefits have been explained and they write a document or orally
Privacy
- The participants does not entirely give up the right to privacy with informed consent
- Linked to issues of anonymity and confidentiality
Covert methods are usually deemed…
Violations of the privacy principle
Confidentiality
Only the researchers collecting or analyzing the data have access to respondents’ personal information
Anonymity
No way to identify a person