Exam 1 Flashcards
What was one of the first systematic attempts to study leadership?
Trait approach
“Great man” Theories (early 1900s)
-Focused on identifying innate qualities and characteristics possessed by great social, political, and military leaders
-Assumes certain people are “born with” leadership capabilities
What did Landmark Stogdill study in 1948?
-Analyzed and synthesized 124 trait studies to study traits interacting with situational demands
-Leadership reconceptualized as a relationship between people in a social situation
-He found that the average individual in a leadership role is different from an average group member with regard to intelligence, alertness, insight, responsibility, initiative, persistence, self confidence, and sociability
Mann in 1959 reviewed 1400 findings of personality and leadership in small groups and found…
-Less emphasis on situations as compared to Stogdill
-Suggested personality traits could be used to discriminate leaders from nonleaders
How was the critical role of traits in leader effectiveness revived?
-Stogdill (1974) analyzed 163 new studies to validate his original study and found 10 characteristics positively identified w leadership
-Lord, DeVader, and Alliger found that personality traits can be used to differentiate leaders/nonleaders
-Kirkpatrick and Lock found 6 traits make up the “right stuff” for leaders
What are the 5 major leadership traits that are known today?
Intelligence, confidence, determination, integrity, and sociability
Intelligence
-Verbal, perceptual, and reasoning capabilities
-Significantly contributes to a leader’s acquisition of complex problem solving skills and social judgment skills
-Research also indicates that a leader’s intellectual ability should not differ too much from insubordinates
Confidence (self-confidence)
-Certainty about one’s competencies and skills
-Includes self esteem, self assurance, and the belief that one can make a difference
Determination
-Desire to get the job done (i.e., initiative, persistence, drive)
-People with determination are willing to assert themselves, are proactive, and have the capacity to persevere in the face of obstacles
Integrity
-The quality of honesty and trustworthiness
-Leaders with integrity inspire confidence in others because they can be trusted to do what they say they are going to do
-They are loyal and dependable
Sociability
-Leader’s inclination to seek out pleasant social relationships
-Leaders who show sociability are friendly, outgoing, courteous, tactful, and diplomatic
-Social leaders have good interpersonal skills and create cooperative relationships with their followers
Five factor personality model and leadership
-A strong relationship between the big 5 personality traits and leadership
-Extraversion was the factor most strongly associated with leadership
-Then conscientiousness, openness, and low neuroticism
-Agreeableness was the only one found weakly associated with leadership
the tendency to be informed, creative, insightful and curious
Openness
the tendency to be thorough, organized, controlled, dependable, and decisive
Conscientiousness
the tendency to be sociable and assertive and to have positive energy
Extraversion
the tendency to be accepting, conforming, trusting, and nurturing
Agreeableness
the tendency to be depressed, anxious, insecure, vulnerable, and hostile
Neuroticism
What is emotional intelligence?
The ability to perceive and:
-apply emotions to life’s tasks
-reason/understand emotions
-express emotions
-use emotions to facilitate thinking
-manage emotions within oneself and relationships
Emotional intelligence as it relates to leadership
People who are more sensitive to their emotions and their impact on others will be more effective leaders
What are some different ways to measure EQ?
-MSCEIT: EQ as a set of mental abilities including the abilities to perceive, facilitate, understand, and manage emotion
-Goleman: EQ as a set of personal and social competencies including self awareness, confidence, self regulation, conscientiousness, and motivation
-Shankman and Allen: EQ as awareness of 3 aspects of leadership including context, self, and others
What is the focus of the trait approach?
-Focuses exclusively on the leader
-What traits leaders exhibit
-Who has these traits
-This approach emphasized that having a leader with a certain set of traits is crucial to having effective leadership
How do organizations use the trait approach?
-Organizations use personality assessments to find the “right” people assuming that it will increase organizational effectiveness
-Helps specify characteristics/traits for specific positions
What are the strengths of the trait approach?
-Intuitively appealing (people “need” to view leaders as gifted
-Credibility due to a century of research support
-Highlights the leadership component in the leadership process
-Provides benchmarks for what to look for in a leader
What are criticisms of the trait approach?
-fails to delimit a definitive list of leadership traits
-doesn’t take into account situational effects
-list of most important leadership traits is highly subjective
-research fails to look at traits in relationship to leadership outcomes
-not useful for training and development
How is the skills approach different from the trait approach?
The skills approach shifts focus from personality characteristics to an emphasis on skills and abilities that can be learned and developed
Three skill approach (Katz, 1955)
-Katz suggests that effective leadership depends on 3 basic personal skills: technical, human, and conceptual
Technical skill
-Having knowledge about and being proficient in a specific type of work or activity
-Specialized competencies, analytical ability, use of appropriate tools and techniques
-Technical skills involve hands on ability with a product or process
-Most important at lower levels of management
Human skill
-Having knowledge about and being able to work with people
-Being aware of ones own perspective and others’ perspectives at the same time
-Assisting group members in working cooperatively to achieve common goals
-creating an atmosphere of trust and empowerment of members
-important at all levels of the organization
Conceptual skill
-the ability to do the mental work of shaping meaning of organizational policy or issues (what the company stands for and where its going)
-works easily with abstraction and hypothetical notions
-central to creating and articulating a vision and strategic plan for an organization
-most important at top management levels