Exam 1 Flashcards
tenacity
unwilligness to change beliefs
scientific concensus
peer reviewed work or what scientists say
beneficence and non malficence
working for the benefit of the people and avoiding harm
exempt research
research the federal government does not require review and approval
fidelity and responsibility
working for the benefit of the community
integrity
honest application of research
justice
striving to make good professional judgements
respect
people’s rights; eliminates bias
deception
not always possible to eliminate but always try to minimize
informed consent
participants must be fully informed and choose to participate
report data
accurately
unethical treatment of subjects/ participants
tuskegee syphllyis study
little albert experiments
nazi experimentation
research fraud/ corruption
falsifying data
plagiarism
not reporting accurately
undisclosed conflicts of interest
legal requirements and ethics in research
informed consent: must choose to participate
voluntary participation: must be free to decline participation and free to withdraw without penalty
debriefing: tell what study was and if deception was used (reverse effects of deception (desensitization))
anonymity: not always possible
confidentiality: if cant be anonymous, dont share info
coercion: must undue influence
IRB
must review and approve most research
implicit deception
there is a reason you are using it
technical
misinforming participants on how an apparatus is being used
role deception
misinforming participants on the role of others
ethical issues in cross cultural research
must be acceptable to the researcher and the people being studied
ethical issues in internet research
not always anonymous and can be an issue if post study follow ups are needed
ethical issues in survey research
confidentiality and anonymity
ethical issues in animal research
cost benefit analysis (does it make sense cost wise to do this compared to the benefits it may result in)
theoretical papers
propose new theories
include empirical data
review of existing literature
speculate or draw on related theories
lit reviews
summarize other bodies of work
propose revisions/ shortcomings
make recommendations and suggest what needs to be addressed