Evidence - Privilege Flashcards
Approach:
Identify privilege, its scope, and its holder. look for xceptions, waivers, or limitations
Which privilege applies, fed or state?
Look for the 6 fed privileges. If not one of those, does state law apply with respect to privileges (i.e., is it a diversity case)?
Testimonial privileges
permit a person to refuse to disclose, and prohibit others from disclosing, certain confidential information in judicial proceedings.
How to determine whether federal or state privilege law should be applied in a particular case in federal court:
• In a federal question case, privileges are governed by federal common law.
• In a federal case based on diversity jurisdiction, the privilege law of the state applies.
When should STATE LAW control?
Federal Rule 501 provides that federal courts shall apply rules of privilege developed at common law except in diversity cases, wherein state law controls, but this is not a diversity case.
Comment on Privilege Forbidden
Neither counsel for the parties nor the judge may comment on someone’s claim of privilege.
Waiver
Any privilege is waived by: (1) failure to claim the privilege; (2) voluntary disclosure of the privileged matter by the privilege holder; or (3) a contractual provision waiving in advance the right to claim a privi- lege.
Eavesdroppers
A privilege based on confidential communications is not destroyed because it was overheard by someone whose presence is unknown to the parties. Under the modern view, in the absence of negligence by the person claiming privilege, even the eavesdropper would be prohibited from testifying.
Federal Common Law Privileges: Privileges recgonzied by fed courts (6)
1) Attorney-client privilege
2) Spousal immunity
3) Marital communications privilege
4) Psychotherapist/social worker-client privilege
5) Clergy-penitent privilege
6) Governmental privileges
Attorney-client privilege
a. Client must be seeking attorney’s services at the time of the communications
b. Communication must be confidential (not intended to be disclosed to third parties)
AC privilege elements
Communications between an attorney and client, made during professional consultation, are privileged from disclosure.
The privilege applies to:
• Confidential communications,
• Between attorney and client (or representatives of either),
• Made during professional legal consultation,
• Unless the privilege is waived or an exception is applicable
Attorney-client privilege TERMINATION and WAIVER
Termination of attorney-client relationship does not terminate privilege; it even survives death. The client holds the privilege, and only they can waive it. The client’s estate representative has the power to waive the privi- lege after the client’s death.
Attorney-client privilege : Corporate Clients Special rules for corporate clients
Corporate Clients: Corporations are “clients” within the meaning of the privilege, and statements made by corporate officials or employees to an attorney are protected if the employees were authorized or directed by the corporation to make such statements.
AC privilege: Confidential Communication
privilege applies to communications only; the privilege does not apply to underlying information, pre-existing documents, or physical evidence. To be protected, the communication must be confidential (meaning, not intended to be disclosed to third parties); communica- tions made in the known presence and hearing of a stranger are not privileged. However, representatives of the attorney or client may be present without destroying the privilege.
AC privilege: Communications Through Agents
Communications made to third persons (such as administrative assistants, messengers, or accountants) are confidential and covered by the privilege if necessary to transmit information between the attorney and client.
communications between a client and a doctor during an examination made at the attorney’s request (this is usually done to help the attor-
ney evaluate the extent of the client’s injuries). Privileged?
physician-patient privilege (infra) does not apply because no treat-ment is contemplated. However, the attorney-client privilege will apply to these communications between the client and a consulting doctor, as long as the doctor is not called as a testifying expert.
AC privilege: Joint Client Rule
—No Privilege Where Attorney Acts for Both Parties: If 2 or more clients with a common interest consult the same attorney, their communications with the attorney concerning the common interest are privileged as to third parties. But if the joint clients later have a dispute with each other concerning the common interest and one client sues the other, the privilege does not apply as between them.
AC privilege: Professional Legal Consultation
The primary purpose of the communication must be to obtain or render legal services, not to give business advice or social advice.
Attorney-client privilege: When does it NOT APPLY?
Nonapplicability
1) Where client seeks legal advice in aid of crime or fraud
2) Parties claiming through the same deceased client
3) Dispute between attorney and client (e.g., malpractice)
4) Client puts legal services at issue
Attorney-client privilege: Crime-fraud exception
no privilege: If the attorney’s services were sought to aid in the planning or commission of something the client should have known was a crime or fraud
Attorney-client privilege: Dispute btwn L and C
no privilege: For a communication relevant to an issue of breach of duty in a
dispute between the attorney and client
Attorney-client privilege: Attorney’s Work Product
Although documents prepared by an attorney for their own use in a case are not protected by the privilege, they are not subject to discovery except in cases of necessity.
a voluntary disclosure of privileged material
operates as a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or work product protection only with respect to the disclosed material.
Undisclosed privileged material is subject to the waiver only if
(1) the waiver was intentional, (2) the disclosed and undisclosed material concern the same subject matter, and (3) the material should be considered together to avoid unfairness. There is no waiver if the disclosure was inadvertent and the holder took reasonable steps to prevent disclosure and rectify the error.