Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Bar > Evidence - MBE > Flashcards

Evidence - MBE Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
MBE flashcards
1
Q

***Relevance

A

Evidence is relevant if:
1) it has ANY TENDENCY TO MAKE A FACT MORE OR LESS PROBABLE than it would be without it;
AND
2) the FACT IS OF CONSEQUENCE in determining the action.

*Relevant evidence is admissible unless another rule or exclusion provides otherwise.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

***RULE 403 EXCLUSIONS

A 
The court may EXCLUDE relevant evidence if its probable value is substantially outweighed by a danger of:
A) UNFAIR PREJUDICE;
B) CONFUSING THE ISSUES;
C) MISLEADING THE JURY;
D) UNDUE DELAY;
E) WASTING TIME; OR
F) BEING NEEDLESSLY CUMULATIVE.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

**Subsequent Remedial Measure

Policy Exclusion

A

Such evidence is NOT admissible to prove:

a) negligence;
b) culpable conduct;
c) a defect in a product or design; OR
d) a need for a warning or instruction.

  • BUT, such evidence may be admitted for other purposes (impeachment, control, ownership, feasibility)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q
  • *Compromise/Settlement Offers & Negotiations

- Policy Exclusions-

A

Statements and offers made during settlement negotiations are NOT admissible to:
a) prove the validity or amount of a disputed claim;
OR
b) impeach by a prior inconsistent statement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
  • *Pleas and Plea Negotiations

- Policy Exclusions-

A

The following are NOT admissible in a subsequent civil or criminal case:
a) statements made during plea discussions;
b) a nolo contendere plea (D doesn’t admit or dispute the charge);
OR
c) a guilty plea that is later withdrawn.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q
  • *Paying or Offering to Pay Medical Expense

- Policy Exclusions-

A

NOT admissible to prove liability, BUT any related statements or factual admissions are admissible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
  • *Liability Insurance

- Policy Exclusions-

A

NOT admissible to prove culpability, BUT admissible for other purposes (i.e. ownership, control, agency).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q
  • *Authentication of Evidence

- Policy Exclusions-

A

All evidence MUST be authenticated before being admitted.

  • PHYSICAL EVIDENCE –> through witness testimony OR by evidence that shows it has been held in a substantially unbroken chain of custody.
  • VOICE RECORDINGS –> by anyone who has heard the person speak AND identified the recorded person as the speaker.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

**Best Evidence Rule - the ORIGINAL WRITING, RECORDING, OR PHOTOGRAPH is required to prove its content UNLESS:

A

a) it’s a RELIABLE DUPLICATE (a photocopy);
b) all the originals are LOST OR DESTROYED, and not by the offering party acting in bad faith;
c) an original CANNOT BE OBTAINED BY JUDICIAL PROCESS;
d) it was NOT PRODUCED AFTER PROPER NOTICE was given to the party in control and against whom it would be offered against; OR
e) it’s NOT CLOSELY RELATED TO A CONTROLLING ISSUE.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

***Character Evidence

A

Generally, character evidence is NOT admissible to prove propensity (that a person acted in conformity with a character train on a particular occasion).

  • BUT, character evidence is generally ALLOWED for non-propensity purposes (i.e. when character is an ultimate issue in the case –> defamation).

***Character Evidence MAY be offered as CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE to prove propensity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

***Character Evidence D’s Character - Criminal Cases

A

D’s Character:

  • D can ALWAYS offer evidence of his own character.
  • Prosecution is NOT allowed to prove D acted in accordance with D’s character trait UNLESS D opens the door.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

***Character Evidence Victim’s Character (not involving rape) - Criminal Cases

A
  • D can offer reputation and opinion evidence to show victim’s character to show D’s innocence.
  • If D presents evidence of victim’s character, Prosecution can offer evidence of:
    (a) victim’s good character (for the same trait);
    OR
    (b) D’s bad character (for the same trait).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

*** Character Evidence -Victim’s Character (homicide case)

A

Prosecution can show victim’s peacefulness ONLY IF D claims victim was the aggressor (self-defense).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

***Character Evidence - Victim’s character (involving rape/sex offenses)

A
  • Generally, NOT admissible to prove victim’s sexual behavior/predisposition.
  • EXCEPTIONS –> court may admit evidence:
    (a) if offered to prove D was not involved in the sex crime;
    (b) of sexual relations between D and victim to prove consent (but,
    prosecutor may offer such evidence for any reason);
    OR
    (c) if its exclusion violates D’s constitutional rights.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

***Character Evidence - Civil Cases - General Rule

A

Character evidence to prove propensity is generally NOT admissible in a civil case.

  • BUT, see sexual misconduct exception below.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

***Character Evidence - Victim’s character (alleged sexual misconduct)
CIVIL CASE

A
  • Victim’s SEXUAL BEHAVIOR/PREDISPOSITION is admissible if its probative value substantially outweighs the danger of (1) harm to any victim, AND (2) unfair prejudice to any party.
  • Victim’s reputation is admissible ONLY IF the victim has placed it in controversy.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

***Methods of Proving Character (Civil Cases)

A
  • Direct Examination –> opinion, reputation

- Cross-examination –> opinion, reputation, specific acts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

**Prior Bad Acts

A
  • Crimes, wrongs, acts - Generally NOT admissible to show propensity.
  • Is admissible for non-propensity purposes –> Motive, identity, absence of mistake/accident intent, common plan or scheme, opportunity, or preparation.
  • To offer such evidence, the proponent MUST show that:
    1) the PRIOR ACT WAS COMMITTED (by a preponderance of evidence;
    AND
    2) the PROBATIVE VALUE SUBSTANTIALLY OUTWEIGHS THE DANGER OF UNFAIR PREJUDICE.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

***Prior Bad Acts - Sexual Assault/Child Molestation Exception

A
  • Prior bad acts of sex crimes are ADMISSIBLE if D is accused of such conduct.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

***Habit/Routine Practice

A
  • Admissible to show that a person (or organization) acted in accordance with their habit or routine practice.
    • Habit = a regular response to a repeated situation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

**Prior Inconsistent Statements - Impeachment

A

Admissible to Impeach a witness.
- Need NOT show/disclose contents of the statement to the witness during examination, BUT must show it to an adverse party’s attorney upon request.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

**Extrinsic Evidence - Impeachment

A

Is admissible ONLY IF:
1) Relevant to a MATERIAL ISSUE AT TRIAL (one other than the witness’s credibility);
AND
2) PROPER FOUNDATION is shown (witness is first given an opportunity to explain or deny the statement AND an adverse party is given an opportunity to examine the witness about it).

*The above requirements DO NOT apply when extrinsic evidence is offered against a party opponent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

**Prior Convictions - Impeachment

A

Evidence of prior convictions may be admitted in certain instances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

**Prior Felony/Misdemeanor Involving Dishonesty - Impeachment

A

ALWAYS admissible to impeach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

**Other Misdemeanors - Impeachment

A

NOT admissible to impeach.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

**Felonies that DO NOT involve Dishonesty - Impeachment

A
  • Civil & Criminal Cases –> Admissible if witness is not the Defendant (subject to Rule 403 exclusions)
  • Criminal Cases only –> Admissible if D is the witness BUT ONLY IF the probative value outweighs any prejudicial effect.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

**10-Year Exception - Impeachment

A
  • If 10 years have passed (from conviction or release from jail - whichever is later), the conviction is NOT admissible UNLESS:
    1) Its probative value outweighs its prejudicial effect;
    AND
    2) the proponent provides reasonable written notice to the adverse
    party.
28
Q

**Pardon/Annulled Exceptions - Impeachment

A
  • Evidence of a conviction is NOT admissible if it’s been pardoned or annulled based on a finding of innocence.
29
Q

***Specific Instances of Conduct - Impeachment

A
  • A witness’s credibility may be attacked on cross-examination with specific instances of conduct (prior bad acts) ONLY IF the CONDUCT IS PROBATIVE OF THE WITNESS’S CHARACTER FOR TRUTHFULNESS OR UNTRUTHFULNESS.
    • Extrinsic evidence is NEVER admissible to attack or support such instances of a witness’s credibility.
30
Q

**Character for Truthfulness - Impeachment

A

A witness’s credibility may be attacked or supported by:
a) Reputation testimony about the witness’s chracter for
truthfulness/untruthfulness
OR
b) Opinion testimony.

*BUT, evidence of the witness’s truthful character is admissible ONLY AFTER ATTACKED.

31
Q

**Ability to Observe, Remember, or Relate Facts - Impeachment

A

A witness’s ability to observe, remember, or relate facts accurately may be attacked on impeachment.

 - Extrinsic evidence is admissible for this purpose.
32
Q

**Hearsay Declarants - Impeachment

A
  • May be attacked (and then supported) by any evidence that would be admissible if the declarant had testified as a witness.
    • Evidence (including hearsay) is admissible to impeach regardless of
      when/whether declarant had an opportunity to explain or deny it.
33
Q

***Refreshing Recollection - Presentation of Evidence

A

Refreshing a witness’s recollection using a document is permitted when the witness:
1) once had personal knowledge of the matter,
BUT
2) is unable to recall it while testifying.

  • Only the OPPOSING PARTY may offer into evidence the item used to refresh (unless it’s admissible on other grounds).
34
Q

**Judicial Notice - Presentation of Evidence

A

A court may take judicial notice of indisputable facts:
a) commonly knowns in the community,
OR
b) readily capable of verification AND that cannot be reasonably questioned.

Civil Cases –> court must instruct jury to accept the noticed fact as conclusive (the fact is dispositive).
Criminal Cases –> court must instruct jury that it MAY OR MAY NOT ACCEPT the noticed fact as conclusive.

35
Q

***Lay Witness Testimony - Presentation of Evidence

A

Is any person who gives testimony in a case that is NOT called as an expert.

Testimony is admissible if the witness:
1) is COMPETENT TO TESTIFY (competency is presumed unless rebutted);
AND
2) has PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE of the matter.

36
Q

***Lay witness may offer an opinion ONLY IF IT’S:

(Presentation of Evidence)

A

1) rationally based on perception;
2) helpful to clearly understand the testimony or determine a fact (not a legal conclusion);
AND
3) not based on scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge.

37
Q

**Expert Witness Testimony - Presentation of Evidence

A

Expert testimony is permitted when:
1) witness is QUALIFIED as an expert;
2) opinion is HELPFUL to the jury;
3) witness believes in the opinion to a REASONABLE DEGREE OF
CERTAINTY;
4) opinion is SUPPORTED by sufficient facts or data;
AND
5) opinion is BASED ON RELIABLE PRINCIPLES AND METHODS that were reliably applied.

RELIABILITY IS BASED ON –> (1) publication and peer review, (2) error rate, (3) testability, AND (4) if it’s generally accepted in the field.

38
Q

***HEARSAY

A

Hearsay is an:

(1) out of court statement,
(2) that is offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted.

  • Admissible ONLY IF it falls under an exception or exclusion.

STATEMENT = a person’s oral or written assertion.
- a nonverbal act is a statement if it’s intended as an assertion.

39
Q

***Multiple Hearsay

A
  • Each level of hearsay MUST fall within an exception or exclusion to be admissible.
40
Q

***Non-hearsay

A

If a statement is offered to prove something other than the truth of the statement, it’s not hearsay and is ADMISSIBLE.

41
Q

***Common Non-Hearsay Statements

A

1) Verbal acts of independent legal significance.
2) To show the effect on the listener.
3) Prior inconsistent statement used to impeach.
4) Circumstantial evidence of the speaker’s state of mind.

42
Q

***Statements by a Party Opponent - Hearsay Exclusions

A

A statement by a party opponent is:
1) Any statement OFFERED AGAINST AN OPPOSING PARTY,
AND
2) That is:
a) MADE BY THE PARTY (Or their representative);
b) ADOPTED or believed to be true by the party (silence may be
sufficient);
c) made by an AUTHORIZED PERSON;
d) made by an AGENT/EMPLOYEE of the party acting within their scope
OR
e) made by a co-conspirator.

43
Q

***Prior Statements by a Witness - - Hearsay Exclusions

A

A prior statement by a declarant-witness is deemed non-hearsay if:
1) DECLARANT TESTIFIES;
2) Declarant is SUBJECT TO CROSS-EXAMINATION about the prior statement;
AND
3) The prior statement:
a) was INCONSISTENT with prior testimony and GIVEN UNDER OATH in
a prior court proceeding or deposition;
b) declarant IDENTIFIES A PERSON as someone they perceived earlier
OR
c) is CONSISTENT with prior testimony and is offered either (i) REBUT
that the declarant is lying, or (ii) to REHABILITATE declarant’s
credibility.

44
Q

***Present Sense Impression - Hearsay Exceptions

A

Is a statement describing an event made by the declarant:
a) while observing the event;
OR
b) immediately thereafter.

  • A few minutes after the event is ok.
45
Q

***Excited Utterance - Hearsay Exceptions

A

Is a statement relating to:

1) a startling event or condition,
2) made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement that the event/condition caused.

*A slight delay between the event and statement is ok.

46
Q

***Business Records - Hearsay Exceptions

A

Admissible if it’s:
(1) a record of events, conditions, opinions, diagnoses,
(2) kept in the regular course of business,
(3) made at or near the time of the matter described,
(4) made by a person with knowledge,
(5) is the regular practice of the business,
AND
(6) the opponent party does not show a lack of trustworthiness.

47
Q

***Statements Made for Medical Diagnosis/Treatment - Hearsay Exceptions

A

Not excluded by the hearsay rule when the statement:
1) is made for (and reasonably pertinent to) medical diagnosis and treatment;
AND
2) describes medical history or symptoms (past or present).

*Statements that are NOT relevant to medical diagnosis or treatment DO NOT fall within this hearsay exception.

48
Q

**Statements of Mental, Emotional, or Physical Condition - Hearsay Exceptions

A

Admissible when the statement is of declarant’s:
a) then-existing state of mind (motive, intent, or plan)
OR
b) emotional, sensory, or physical condition.

*BUT, statements of memory or belief are NOT admissible UNLESS it relates to the validity or terms of the declarant’s will.

49
Q

**Dying Declaration - Hearsay Exceptions

A

Elements to be admissible:
1) Declarant is unavailable;
2) Statement made under a sense of impending death;
AND
3) Statement was about the circumstances or cause that put the declarant in the position of impeding death.

*ONLY ALLOWED in civil cases and criminal homicide cases.

50
Q

**Declarant Unavailable Requirement - Hearsay Exceptions

A

Deemed unavailable if the witness:
a) is except due to PRIVILEGE;
b) REFUSES TO TESTIFY despite a court order;
c) DOES NOT REMEMBER;
d) cannot be present because of DEATH OR ILLNESS;
OR
e) is BEYOND THE REACH OF A COURT’S SUBPOENA and cannot be procured by reasonable means.

51
Q

**Statement Against Interest - Hearsay Exceptions

A

A statement against one’s OWN PENAL, PROPRIETARY, OR PECUNIARY INTEREST is ADMISSIBLE when the declarant is unavailable.

  • Criminal Cases –> it must be supported by corroborating circumstances that clearly indicate its truthworthiness.
52
Q

**Public Records - Hearsay Exceptions

A

The following records are admissible:
a) a record describing POLICIES AND PRACTICES of a public office;
b) OBSERVATIONS made by someone in accordance with his duties by law (but excludes police reports in criminal case);
OR
c) FACTUAL FINDINGS from a legally authorized investigation (but only in civil cases or against the govt in a criminal case).

*But, such records will NOT be admitted if the opponent party shows a lack of trustworthiness.

53
Q

**Past Recollection Recorded - Hearsay Exceptions

A

Is a record made on a matter the witness once knew about, but now cannot recall well enough to testify fully and accurately.

54
Q

**Past Recollection Recorded is admissible if: (Hearsay Exceptions)

A

1) witness had personal knowledge at one time;
2) writing was made or adopted by the witness;
3) it was made while the event was still fresh in the witness’s mind;
4) is accurate;
AND
5) witness can no longer remember the event.

*The record may be READ into evidence, BUT it can only be received as an EXHIBIT if offered by an adverse party.

55
Q

***Right to Confront Witnesses (6th A)

Hearsay and 6th A Rights

A

The Confrontation Clause gives a criminal D the right to CONFRONT WITNESSES AGAINST HIM.

56
Q

***The use of an out-of-court statement (even if within a hearsay exception) violates the 6th A when:

A

1) The statement is TESTIMONIAL;
2) DECLARANT IS UNAVAILABLE to be cross-examined at trial;
AND
3) D DID NOT HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO CROSS-EXAMINE the declarant before trial.

Testimonial= Statements made to:
a) Grand juries
OR
b) The police whose primary purpose (when viewed objectively) was to collect testimony to be used at a later trial.

*A statement to assist the police in an ONGOING EMERGENCY is NOT testimonial.

57
Q

***Ongoing Emergency

Hearsay and 6th A Rights

A

Existence of an ongoing emergency determined by:
1) nature of the dispute;
2) potential harm to the victim;
3) threat to additional identifiable victims;
4) generalized threat to the public;
5) type of weapon;
AND
6) whether suspect is at large or located, but not apprehended.

58
Q

**Spousal Immunity

Spousal Privileges

A

A witness-spouse in a valid marriage MAY REFUSE TO TESTIFY AGAINST THEIR SPOUSE IN A CRIMINAL CASE.

  • Only the witness-spouse hold this privilege, but privilege ends after divorce.
  • Spousal Immunity DOES NOT apply in Civil cases.
59
Q

**Confidential Marital Communications

Spousal Privileges

A

Communications between spouses are privileges if:
1) made during the course of a valid marriage;
AND
2) were intended to be confidential.

  • Either spouse may assert privilege, and it applies after divorce.
  • Privilege applies in BOTH civil and criminal cases.
60
Q

**Spousal Privileges DO NOT apply:

A

a) in cases between the spouses;
OR
b) when a spouse commits a crime against the other spouse or their children.

61
Q

**Attorney-Client Privilege

A

Protects confidential communications between attorney and client if:
1) intended to be confidential;
AND
2) made to facilitate legal services.

  • The client holds the privilege and may waive it by disclosing info to a third-party (but it’s not waived through inadvertent/unintentional disclosure).
62
Q

**Attorney-Client Privilege DOES NOT apply when:

A

a) legal services are sought to further a crime or fraud;
b) a litigation is related to a breach of duty between the attorney and client;
OR
c) joint clients are later involved in civil ligation against each other.

63
Q

**Attorney Work Product Doctrine

A

Protects from disclosure all materials prepared by an attorney (or his agents) in anticipation of or during litigation.

 - Exception --> if a party shows:
     (1) a substantial need exists;
     AND
     2) a substantial equivalent cannot be obtained without undue 
         hardship.
64
Q

**Physician-Patient Privilege

A

Most States –> recognize the privilege if: (1) it is a confidential patient communication, (2) made to a physician, (3) for the purpose of medical diagnosis or treatment.
- The patient holds the privilege, BUT it may be waived when a medical condition is placed in issue (i.e. personal injury lawsuit).

Federal Courts –> DO NOT recognize the privilege.
- However, state law governs privilege for civil cases in federal court on a claim/defense when state law supplies the rule of decision.

65
Q

**Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege

A

ALL STATES recognize the privilege which protects:

1) confidential patient communications,
2) made to a psychotherapist (psychologist, psychiatrist, or social worker);
3) for the purpose of psychological treatment.

  • The patient holds the privilege and may waive it.

Exceptions - include:

  • COURT-ORDERED EXAMINATIONS
  • CIVIL COMMITMENT PROCEEDINGS to determine if hospitalization is required.
  • When the condition is PLACED “IN ISSUE” BY THE PATIENT.
  • The DANGEROUS-PATIENT EXCEPTION - The therapist has a duty to warn when he knows (or should know) that the patient poses a serious threat of violence to foreseeable victims.

Bar (8 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions