Evidence Flashcards

1
Q

S44 - sexual experience

A

Evidence of sexual experience-
-No evidence/questions can be put to the witness regarding the complainants sexual experience with any other person other than the defendant. Accept with the judges permission.
-No evidence/questions can be put to the witness that relates to the reputation of the complainant in sexual matters.
-the judge must not grant permission unless satisfied the evidence/question is directly relevant to the facts in issue or the appropriate sentence that would be contrary to the interests of justice to exclude it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

S87 - address

A

Privacy to the witnesses address-
In court proceedings a persons address cannot without permission from the judge:
A)be the subject of any question or evidence.
B)be included in any statement or remark made by the witness, lawyer, officer of the court or any other person.
-the judge must not grant permission unless the evidence/question/statement/remark are of directed relevance and to exclude it would be contrary to the interests of justice.
-an application can be made to the judge before or after the start of the hearing and if possible be dealt with in chambers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

S88 - occupation

A

Complainants Occupation-
-protects the complainant from having questions put to them about their occupation.
An application to the judge must be made for this information to be disclosed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

S121 - corroboration

A

The complainants evidence does not need to be corroborated as there is often no independent witness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

S97 - oral evidence

A

Under special circumstances an application for the court to hear oral evidence.
If granted the complainant will have protection around who is present and what can be asked.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

S35 - Previous consistent statement

A

A previous statement that is consistent with the witnesses evidence is inadmissible.

Unless:
A. The witnesses veracity is challenged then a previous statement is admissible to respond to the challenge.
B. Forms an integral part of the events before the court.
C. Consists of the mere fact that a complainant has been made in a criminal case.

Only used as rebuttal evidence.
Includes what the complainant said to a witness about an incident, then the witnesses information can be used in court as rebuttal evidence if the complainants veracity is challenged.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly