Evidence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is “relevance”?

A

Evidence is relevant if it tends to make the existence of any fact of consequence to the outcome of the action more probable than it would without the evidence.

Generally must relate to time, event, or person involved in the present controversy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

When can a judge exclude relevant evidence?

A

A trial judge has broad discretion to exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, undue delay, or waste of time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When is evidence of liability insurance allowed in?

A

It may be admissible to (i) prove ownership or control, (ii) to impeach, or (iii) as part of an admission.

It is NOT admissible to show negligence or ability to pay a substantial judgment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When is evidence of subsequent remedial measures admissible?

A

This evidence may be admissible to (i) prove ownership or control, (ii) to rebut a claim that the precaution was not feasible, or (iii) to prove that the opposing party has destroyed evidence.

It is NOT admissible to prove negligence, culpable conduct, a defect in a product or its design, or a need for a warning or instruction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When is the rule regarding admissibility of settlement offers and withdrawn guilty pleas?

A

Evidence of compromises or offers to compromise is not admissible to prove liability for, or invalidity of, a claim that is disputed as to validity or amount. Not even direct admissions of liability during compromise negotiations are admissible. Likewise, withdrawn guilty pleas and offers to plead guilty are inadmissible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

For what type of facts will a court take judicial notice?

A

Courts take judicial notice of indisputable facts that are either matters of common knowledge in the community (notorious facts) or capable of verification by resort to easily accessible sources of unquestionable accuracy (manifest facts). Courts have increasingly taken judicial notice of scientific principles as a type of manifest fact. Judicial notice of such facts may be taken at any time, whether or not requested.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Procedural aspects of judicial notice

A

If a court does not take judicial notice of a fact on its own accord, a party must formally request that notice be taken of the particular fact. Judicial notice may be taken for the first time on appeal.

The fact is conclusively proven in a civil case but not a criminal one. In a criminal case, the jury is instructed that it may, but is not required to, accept as conclusive any judicially noticed fact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is real evidence?

A

Real or demonstrative evidence is actual physical evidence addressed directly to the trier of fact. Real evidence may be direct, circumstantial, original, or prepared (demonstrative).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

In addition to being relevant, what other requirements must real evidence satisfy?

A

It must be authentic, it must be in substantially the same condition at trial, and it must satisfy the balancing test (i.e. some auxiliary policy or principle may outweigh the need to admit the evidence, such as physical inconvenience or bringing the object into the courtroom, indecency or impropriety, or undue prejudice).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How may handwriting be authenticated?

A

By a showing that it is genuine, by either:

By the opinion of a nonexpert with personal knowledge of the alleged writer’s handwriting.

By the opinion of an expert who has compared the writing to samples of the maker’s handwriting.

By the trier of fact through comparison of samples.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

May a nonexpert become familiar with a person’s handwriting for the purposes of testifying?

A

No. Unlike voice recognition, the nonexpert testifying as to the genuineness of handwriting must have been familiar with the handwriting before the litigation arose.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How is an ancient document authenticated?

A

A document may be authenticated by evidence that it is (1) at least 20 years old, (2) Is in such condition as to be free from suspicion as to authenticity, and (3) Was found in a place where such a writing would likely be kept.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How are photographs authenticated?

A

Generally, photographs are admissible only if identified by a witness as a portrayal of certain facts relevant to the issue and verified by the witness as a correct representation of those facts. Ordinarily, it is not necessary to call the photographer to authenticate the photograph; a witness familiar with the scene is sufficient.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How is an X-Ray authenticated?

A

Unlike photographs, X-Rays require it to be shown that the process used is accurate, the machine was in working order, and the operator was qualified to operate it. Finally, a custodial chain must be established to assure that the X-Ray has not be tampered with.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the Best Evidence Rule?

A

To prove the terms of a writing (including a recording, photograph, or X-Ray), the original writing must be produced if the terms of the writing are material. Secondary evidence of the writing is admissible only if the original is unavailable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When does the Best Evidence Rule apply?

A

The B.E.R. applies to two classes of situations: (1) the writing is a legally operative or dispositive instrument; or (2) the knowledge of a witness concerning a act results from having read it in the document.

17
Q

When may a treatise be read and considered by the jury as substantive evidence?

A

Although hearsay, it is an exception. Information in treatises may be read into evidence if the treatise is (i) relied upon by the expert or is called to his attention during cross-examination, and (ii) is established as reliable by the witness, another expert, or judicial notice. The treatise itself is not admitted into evidence, but rather the relevant section is read.

18
Q

What is the rule when existence of a presumed fact is submitted to a jury in a criminal case?

A

The judge must instruct the jury that it may regard the basic facts as sufficient evidence of the presumed fact, but that it is not required by law to do so. If the presumed fact is an element of the offense, its existence must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.

19
Q

What is the past recollection recorded exception to the hearsay rule?

A

If a witness has insufficient memory of an event that prevents him from testifying fully and accurately, even after consulting a writing given to him on the stand, the writing may be introduced into evidence if a proper foundation is laid.

20
Q

How is a foundation laid for admitting a document showing a past recollection recorded?

A

Proof that (i) at one time the witness has personal knowledge of the facts recited in the writing, (ii) the writing was made by or at the direction of the witness or has been adopted by her, (iii) the writing was timely made when the matter was fresh in the mind of the witness, (iv) the writing is accurate, and (v) the witness has sufficient recollection to testify fully and accurately.

21
Q

What are the elements of the business records exception to the hearsay rule?

A

(1) Records of a business of any type
(2) Made in the regular course of business
(3) The business regularly keeps such records
(4) Made contemporaneously (at or about the time of the event recorded)
(5) Contents consist of information observed by employees of the business, or a statement falls within an independent hearsay exception.

22
Q

What are the elements of the public records exception to the hearsay rule?

A

Records of a public office or agency setting forth:

(1) The activities of the office or agency; or
(2) Matters observed pursuant to a duty imposed by law; or
(3) Findings of fact or opinion resulting from some investigation authorized by law

Exclusion: police reports prepared for prosecutorial purposes are not admissible against defendant in criminal case, nor is prosecution allowed to introduce such reports against defendant under alternative theory of business records.

Also, watch out for scenarios where a third party provides the information, i.e. someone who does not have a business duty to report accurately.

23
Q

What are the four requirements to admit a statement against interest as a hearsay exception?

A

A statement must (i) have been against pecuniary, proprietary, or penal interest when made; (ii) the declarant must have had personal knowledge of the facts; (iii) the declarant must have been aware that the statement is against his interest and he must have had no motive to misrepresent when he made the statement; and (iv) the declarant must be unavailable as a witness.