Agency and Partnership Flashcards
What is the two part test for whether a principal will be liable for torts committed by his agent?
If (1) there is a principal/agent relationship (ABC) and (2) the tort was committed by the agent within the scope of that relationship.
What does the principal/agent relationship require?
The principal/agent relationship requires:
1) Assent – an informal agreement between the principal (who has capacity) and the agent
2) Benefit – the agent’s conduct must be for the principal’s benefit
3) Control – the principal must have the right to control the agent by having the power to supervise the manner of the agent’s performance
What is the key distinction between an agent and an independent contractor?
There is no right to control an independent contractor because there is no power to supervise the manner of its performance. There can be no vicarious liability for independent contractor’s torts because no control (3d element of relationship fails).
What are the exceptions to the rule that says no vicarious liability for torts of independent contractors?
Inherently Dangerous Activity Exception – if your independent contractor commits a tort while engaged in an IDA, there will be vicarious liability.
Estoppel – if you hold out your independent contractor with the appearance of agency, you will be estopped from denying liability on that ground as well.
Scope of principal/agent relationship factors
(a) Was conduct “of the kind” agent was hired to perform? If within job description, likely inside the scope.
(b) Did the tort occur on the job? Frolic vs. Detour
(c) Did the agent intend to benefit the principal? If the agent even in part intended to benefit the principal by its conduct, this is enough to be inside the scope.
What is the difference between a frolic and a detour?
A frolic is a new, independent journey, therefore outside the scope of the agent/principal relationship. A detour is a mere departure form assigned task, and therefore within the scope of the agency.
When is a principal liable for the intentional torts of the agent (i.e. what are the exceptions to the general rule of no liability)?
Intentional torts are within the scope if the conduct was:
(1) Authorized by the principal;
(2) Natural from the nature of the employment; or
(3) Motivated by a desire to serve the principal
When is a principal liable for the contracts entered by its agent?
ONLY if the principal authorized the agent to enter the contract
Four types of authority
Actual express authority, actual implied authority, apparent authority, and ratification
Actual Express Authority
Principal used words to express authority to agent. Can be oral, even private.
Exception: If the contract itself must be in writing, then the express authority must be in writing as well. Look out for Statute of Frauds issues, especially contracts for sale of land.
What will revoke actual express authority?
Unilateral act of either the principal or the agent, or the death or incapacity of the principal.
Exception: The principal may give the agent a durable power of attorney. Power of attorney is a written expression of authority to enter a transaction. Durable means clear survival language.
Actual Implied Authority
Authority which the principal gives the agent through conduct or circumstance:
(1) Necessity – there is implied authority to do all tasks necessary to accomplish an expressly authorized task
(2) Custom – there is implied authority to do all tasks which, by custom, are performed by persons with the agent’s title or position
(3) Prior acquiescence by the principal – there is implied authority to do all tasks which the agent believes to be authorized from prior acquiescence by the principal
Apparent Authority
Two part test: (1) Principal CLOAKED agent with the appearance of authority, and (2) third party reasonably relies on the appearance of authority.
Ratification
Authority can be granted after the contract has been entered, if:
(1) Principal has knowledge of all material facts regarding the contract, and
(2) Principal accepts its benefits.
Exception: ratification cannot alter the terms of the contract
The Rules of Liability on the Contract for Agents and Principles
General Rule: The principal is liable on its authorized contracts, and therefore as a rule authorized agents are generally not liable on their authorized contracts. Exception: the undisclosed principal – if principal is partially disclosed (only the identity of the principal concealed) or undisclosed (fact of principal concealed), authorized agents may nonetheless be liable at the election of the third party.