Events Flashcards
1882
Society for Psychical Research founded.
Not break w naturalistic science: the poss reality of Spiritualism and other occult phenomena wld not constitute a break w a naturalistic worldview, but rather indicate that our picture of the natural world had to be radically expanded.
Psychical research thus predicated on an open-ended naturalism
1869
London Dialectical Society special commission to investigate Spiritualism and psychic phenomena
Commission’s report concluded bulk of evd concerning Spiritualistic phenomena cld not at present be discounted as fraudulent. Advised more research on topic.
1875
lawyer Edward Cox established Psychological Society of Great Britain.
Establishment of psychology as wholly ‘secular’ academic discipline was still decades away
Sidgwick Circle
- Henry Sidgwick. Utilitarian moral philosopher. Advocate of educational reform
- Eleanor Sidgwick
- Arthur Balfour - SPR President 1892-5
- Lord General Balfour - in charge of cross-correspondences experiments early 20th C
- Classicist Edumnd Gurney
- Classicist Frederic Myers
- Richard Hodgson
SPR output
14,000 pages of research reports, theorizing and experimental notes published by the SPR’s journal and proceedings 1882-1900
US reaction to uses of probability in Phantasms of the Living (1886)
amateur uses of probability sparked sharp debate in first volume of Proceedings of the American branch of the SPR, where philosopher, logician and mathematician Peirce lashed out at the SPR researchers: ‘I shall not cite these numbers, which captivate the ignorant, but which repel thinking men, who know that no human certitude reaches such figures of trillions, or even billions, to one’
Hodgson’s expositions
Exposé of methods of Blavatsky 1884-5
Hodgson accused Richet, Myers and Lodge of being fooled by Palladino
Hodson exposed her fraud in trials at Myers’ house in Cambridge, 1895
SPR generational shift (Asprem)
W exception of Eleanor Sidgwick, all mems of the Sidgwick circle - first generation of SPR - were dead by 1905
SPR presidents 1900-39
- Nobel laureates Bergson, Rayleigh
- Famous politicians, Gerald Balfour, chief secretary for Ireland 1900-5
- Biologist/ philosopher, Driesch
- McDougall
- Broad
1925, stage magician Harry Price
convinced University of London to support him in establishing the National Laboratory for Psychical Research which was to act as a more scientific counterpart to the SPR. Turned out to be used more for debunk ing tho
1924, US (Asprem)
institutional schism
controversy that had erupted over tests run with famous Boston physical medium Mina Crandon (‘Margery’). McDougall, Houdini etc investigated. When the comte’s report concluded Margery was fraudulent, the American SPR took a curious course of action - disregarded the verdict, fired critics from positions of power in the society. Started circulating apologetic articles, books and pamphlets defending Margery
- One of orchestrators of this devel = Le Roy Crandon, Margery’s husband
- Prince, who had been editor of the ASPR journal and on Margery comte, was fired
1925, US, Prince
established Boston Society for Psychical Research (BSPR to act as a scientific counterpart to the American SPR
Ceased operations 1934
Last thing the BSPR did was publish Rhine’s Extra-Sensory Perception (1934) - paradigmatic text of experimental parapsychology. Initiated new phase in history of psychical research - new institutions, oft connected to mainstream research universities, pursued the scientific track through what became professional parapsychology. Emergence of professional parapsychology marked the end of the SPR as an institution of any serious scientific promise
Carrington
journalist and member of the American SPR
authored more than one hundred books, primarily on psychical research, spiritualism, magic and magical traditions, and occult phenomena such as astral projection.2 By the 1920s, those who presumed to know something about psychical research were quite likely to have their knowledge from Carrington’s writings. (Asprem)
e.g. 1909, Eusapia Palladino and her phenomena
Cross-correspondences
By 1906, some of the most prominent first-generation figures had returned from the afterlife
Verrall, Holland, and Piper would produce hundreds of messages in total, with the major breakthrough occurring during Piper’s stay in England
First systematic reports on cross-correspondences published in the SPR Proceedings, 1908
1910 the research was made available to a broader public through the concise exposition in Helen Alexandrina Dallas’ Mors Janua Vitae?
Through reliance on the cross-correspondences the SPR seems to have abandoned their earlier attempts to emulate strictly naturalistic methods, and instead developed an increasingly esoteric form of hermeneutics (Asprem)
Latin Experiment
1906:
a specific question with instructions intended for “Myers” had been translated into dense and difficult Ciceronian Latin, and read to Mrs Piper in one of her “trance states”.
researchers spent the next months attempts to draw significant references out of the mediums’ statements. In the quest to find what they were looking for, the psychical researchers seized increasingly abstruse methods of interpretation, where hidden anagrams and secret symbols were considered for clues, down to the letter.46 While they were ultimately convinced by the evidence thus produced, in the form of symbolic and thematic correspondences across a wide set of séance notes, it is hard for the outsider to avoid observing that they also stretched their interpretations to the limits in order to get to that conviction
1891
Annales des sciences psychiques founded - Richet = a key driving force
Quantitative studies of isolated effects of telepathy in SPR’s early yrs (Asprem)
Richet appears to have been the first to apply probability calculus to the guessing of playing cards in a larger population, for which he found some very slight evidence of thought-transference
Following Richet’s publications, the economist F. Y. Edgeworth, an expert on statistics, contributed a series of papers to the SPR journal that explained the use – and misuse – of probability calculus.113 For example, Edgeworth warned that even when probabilities seemed to rule against a pure chance result, and thus indicating that there is some agency involved, ‘[t]he calculus is silent as to the nature of that agency – whether it is more likely to be vulgar illusion or extraordinary law’.
The development of probabilities introduced a new and popular rhetorical tactic to the psychical research literature of the 1880s and 1890s, in which probabilities against chance were liberally invoked for any kind of phenomenon that was being discussed
these figures were, however, given without any standardised method of control, and we find some utterly ridiculous numbers put on the most unfitting type of material. Gurney et al.’s Phantoms of the Living is exemplary
McDougall
crucial role in the formation of British psychology over the first two decades of the 20th century; he had occupied positions at both Cambridge and Oxford, and worked as an explicit counterweight to the popularity of Freud and the psychoanalytic movement. (Asprem)
1920, professor of psychology at Harvard
1921, president of the SPR
1922 Boston lecture, and his
1926 lecture at the conference “For and Against Psychical Research” held at Clark University.
How did McDougall try to convince his audience that committed sceptics and spiritualists were both wrong?
Against the hard-nosed sceptics, he used arguments resonant with what is considered good scientific conduct.22 A true man of science, McDougall argued, is obliged to scrutinise all opinions held by sophisticated people, even popular opinions.
Whether or not the phenomena will be found to be authentic was less important; the crucial thing was to not reject a whole field of research out of hand.
attack on convinced spiritualists was perhaps the most important aspect of McDougall’s 1922 polemic.23 It can be seen as an exercise in internal boundary-work, aimed at exorcising elements in the field that were deemed to be a liability
McDougall’s main problem with the spiritualists was their strong and apparently unshakable conviction, which appeared dogmatic and wholly counterproductive.
The divisive Boston lecture was, in the end, a call for organised, scientific psychical research on a big scale with the aim of convincing a group that was getting ever more significant in modern society: the professional scientists
In the picture that McDougall painted, psychical researchers became “more scientific” than their “dogmatically agnostic” opponents
Arriving at Duke university in the summer of 1927, William McDougall finally found himself in a position to develop policies and administer budgets.
Inspired by McDougall’s repeated pleas for the institutionalisation of psychical research, the Rhines eagerly wanted to conduct such work in a university setting.
Their cooperation with McDougall would lead to the foundation of the first autonomous research institute for parapsychology at an American university.
American SPR founded in Boston (later New York)
1884
Despite the enthusiasms of James, the Boston society was a great deal more skeptical than its London counterpart
By 1889 it had concluded (with Richet) that there was no sound statistical support for telepathy.
- First president of the ASPR ridiculed phenomena the Society had been set up to address, in Science
- Ruthless in exposing fraud. Letter to Banner of Light (1886) on Mrs Hannah Ross, a physical medium. Used dummy slung around neck to give impression of child spirit in darkness
Pierre Janet
unconscious activity with its own volition, independent of that exhibited in conscious processes. Will, fundamental to Cousin’s philosophical psychology, was preserved by Janet within a subject divided into multiple selves, conscious and unconscious
Fourth International Congress of Psychology
1900
- Was through assoc w somnambulism and hypnotism that research on spiritism claimed presence in the 1900 congress.
- Denis, Delanne, Encausse, Baradux, Dariex - discussed variety of supranormal phenomena e.g. exteriorization of sensibility, measurement of the life force, clairvoyance, mental suggestion, movement of objects w/o physical contact, telepathy
Vogt, Against Spiritism - regretted that spiritists invade our section and compromise it with their antiscientific presentations.
anatomophysiological group.
At head of group = clinical psychologist Paul Valentin - reiterated that scientific psychology cld only be study of functions of the brain. Psychology = branch of biology, whose only place is between physiology and sociology
Hartenberg concluded by demanding, along with Ebbinghaus, that the questions connexes be excluded from the section on hypnosis in subsequent congresses. Hippolyte Bernheim, who presided over the session, agreed that the discussion of these issues should be cordoned into their own subsection.
Ochorowicz anticipated the complaint of the anatomophysiological group by tying the research of the institute to the positive science of Auguste Comte and assured the congress participants that the methods of the new organization were to be marked by their absolute independence from the metaphysical tradition that had “eschewed experience” and “ignored shared scientific method.” 29 The institute was to be equipped with a conference room, a library, a museum, a clinic, a journal, and, most important, a laboratory
In the aftermath of the “stormy” session of the section on hypnosis and questions connexes, several participants had grown concerned that “behind the word psychique there was the dreaded phantom of études psychiques [psychical studies]!” 34 As a concession, the name was changed to Institut Psychologique International just before the congress convened
Marthe Béraud, 1905
Algerian villa of a retired French army officer and his wife.
the Villa Carmen became the scene of astonishing events in which spirits took on physical form, breathed, walked, talked, touched observers, posed for photographs, and then vanished like vapor. Richet’s testimony, which appeared alongside photos of a phantom in Les Annales des Sciences Psychiques and, in an abbreviated version, in Le Figaro, detailed these experiences and confirmed that the phenomena had not been produced by fraudulent means.
Magnetized in a curtained corner of the room, Béraud remained visible during the materializations through an
opening in the fabric. At her feet formed what was described as a ball of tissue, a substance that gave Richet occasion to coin the term ectoplasme, a substance he suspected was physiological in origin. From this ball developed the head of Bien-Boa, which lifted vertically from the floor to achieve full stature, complete with cloak, helmet, and beard
Richet also dismissed the suggestion that some duplicitous role had been played by two other women who frequented the séances (the négresse Aïssa and a palmist called Ninon) on the basis that the collusion of the socially respectable Marthe with such persons was unthinkable, given her “purity” and the “simplicity of [her] soul.”
Richet’s most esteemed colleagues, including Théodule Ribot, Pierre Janet, and Théodore Flournoy, would tend to echo this sentiment by reaffirming his reputation as a perspicacious man of science. 64 More skeptical readers were, however, less inclined to give Richet the benefit of the doubt and wasted no time constructing an alternative version of events
clinical psychologist Valentin complained Richet= inadequately trained to study spiritism.
Phenomenon belonged to domain of mental pathology. Not subject to the experimental methods of the physiologist
B’s acceptance of gifts of jewelry from both Gabriel Delanne and Richet was deemed inappropriate by the matronly Noël, as was the physical contact between them occasioned by the séances.
newspaper article in 1906 revealed that an Arab coachman known as Areski, who had previously worked at the villa, had been hired to play the part of Bien Boa and that the entire thing was a hoax. Areski wrote that he made his appearance into the room by a trapdoor. Béraud also admitted to being involved with the hoax