Evaluation Points For The Sections

Question 1

Section 2 eval point

Answer 1

The ECHR and UK legislation isnt drafted in the same way. EU is wider while UK is narrower. (First paragraph with Bill of rights point)

Question 2

Section 3 eval point

Answer 2

There is strain on the courts to avoid declarations of incompatabilities, this increases the power of the judges as well, which people dont like. (Paragraph 2)

Question 3

Section 4 eval point

Answer 3

Parliamnetary sovereignty remains in tact, but they dont have to do anytrhing about the declaration of incompatability, and can still pass laws that arent convention compatible. (Paragraph 4)

Question 4

Section 6 eval point

Answer 4

Limits the power of public authorities. This can be seen as a good and a bad thing because they are fearing being sued by their actions. (Esspecially the police) (paragraph six)

Question 5

Section 7 eval point

Answer 5

Its much cheaper, more conveinent and less time consuming. (Add this point in introduction)

Question 6

Section 8 eval point

Answer 6

Allows for court flexibility. This helps remedies be effective and to achive justice. (In paragraph 3 with s.19)

Question 7

Section 10 eval point

Answer 7

Allows for issues to be fixed quickly, this leads to justice and no one else will suffer from infringement. (Paragraph 5)

Question 8

Section 19 eval point

Answer 8

Parliament must consider human rights issues to work with the convention. But it doent have to be convention compatable which results in injustice. (Paragraph 3 w/s.8)