EVALUATION OF THE OPERATION OF COURTS AND VCAT Flashcards
4 strengths of courts in resolving disputes
All types
Specialised
Legal representation
Independent experts
All types
The courts can hear all types of cases, both criminal and civil. They are not limited by any legislation which specifies the types of disputes that can be heard.
Specialised
The courts have developed specialised lists or courts to allow for greater administrative convenience and specialisation for certain cases. Examples of specialised lists or courts include the Drug Court and the Assessment and Referral Court List in the Magistrates’ Court, the Koori Court Division in the Magistrates’ Court and County Court, and the Commercial Court in the Supreme Court.
Legal representation
The use of legal representation ensures that parties are equally represented and able to argue their case. This can benefit the parties in ensuring rules of evidence and procedure are complied with and their best case is put forward.
Independent experts
The courts use independent experts whose specialist skills help determine the outcome of cases. The judges are experts in their area and will use their skills and experience in handing down a decision.
4 weaknesses of courts in resolving disputes
Fees
Delays
Formal
Adversarial
Fees
High court fees and the need for legal representation make it expensive. This may lead to people not pursuing their cases.
Delays
Delays are very common and often there is a backlog of cases waiting to be heard. This can cause issues for the parties, such as longer delay in getting a just outcome, problems with witnesses being able to recall their evidence, and the possibility of some parties or even witnesses dying before the case is heard. This can result in parties waiting a very long time for their dispute to be resolved.
Formal
Strict rules of evidence and procedure are followed. This formality could be intimidating for parties.
Adversarial
It is adversarial in nature, with one party winning and the other losing, which could increase tension between the parties.
4 strengths of VCAT in resulting disputes
Cheaper
Quicker
Informal
Specialised
Cheaper
VCAT is normally cheaper than courts due to low application fees. Parties being able to represent themselves also results in lower costs.
Quicker
There is quicker resolution of disputes – the average time from application to resolution of disputes in some lists is about five weeks.
Informal
An informal atmosphere ensures that parties can put their case forward in their own way, rather than be subject to strict rules of evidence and procedure. Telephone and video conferences are also available in place of attending the tribunal, as well as online resolution.
Specialised
Each list operates in its own specialised jurisdiction. This results in the tribunal personnel developing expertise in resolving disputes in that area.