Evaluation of the classic research

Question 1

Methodology and procedure- Research method (lab experiment)?

Answer 1

One main strength is that L&P used lab experiment and ensured that the experiment was controlled so therefore internal validity was high

Question 2

Methodology and procedure- Research method (lab experiment), how was there experiment controlled?

Answer 2

An experiment, allowed L+P to form a cause and effect relationship. Occurred through the manipulating of the IV
Controlled potential confounding variables to ensure the impact of the dependant variable was due to the independent variable only

Question 3

Methodology and procedure- Experimental design (independent measures)?

Answer 3

Strength
Each p only completes one condition of iv, less chance of them guessing aim, or experiencing order effects
But can be a weakness because of participant variables (characteristics about the p’s affecting the result)

Question 4

Methodology and procedure- Ecological validity?

Answer 4

Weekess
Lacks ecological validity, had to watch videos of car crashes so therefore not actually witnessing a crime

Question 5

Methodology and procedure- Ecological validity- Yuile and Cutshall (1986)?

Answer 5

Their was greater accuracy in giving information four months layer, despite being asked leading questions

Question 6

Methodology and procedure- Ecological validity- Foster et al 1994?

Answer 6

If p’s watched what they thought to be real life e.g. robbery and were told that their responses would influence the trial, p’s would remember more accurately

Question 7

Methodology and procedure- Sample?

Answer 7

Sample was students
This is a weakness because it lacks population validity
Since p’s were US university students other groups of people may be more of less prone to being affected by leading q’s?

Question 8

Methodology and procedure- sample Schacter et al 1991?

Answer 8

Found that elderly people have more difficulty remembering the source of their information, even though their memory of the actual situation is unimpaired
Therefore will be more likely to be affected by leading q’s

Question 9

Internal validity of study?

Answer 9

Accuracy of the study, does it measure what it intends to
Operationalise the variables
Standardise the procedure
Blind procedure
Randomisation

Question 10

External validity of the study?

Answer 10

Accuracy beyond the study- can results be generalised
Population, ecological and tempural (is it still appropriate for time were in)

Question 11

Internal reliability in study?

Answer 11

Consistency within the study
-Standardised procedures
-Operationalise variables
-More than 1 researcher
-Split half reliability

Question 12

External reliability in study?

Answer 12

Consistency overtime
test retest

Question 13

Ethics- deception?

Answer 13

The students were not told the aims of the study as this may affect speed estimate results
-From the p pov this was not a serious ethical issue because at probable would not have lead to refusal to take part

Question 14

Ethics- informed consent?

Answer 14

Students naive of the aims and weren’t aware about study so couldn’t give informed consent
But give retrospective consent after debrief

Question 15

Ethics- right to withdrawal?

Answer 15

P’s were all students of uni where Loftus was a professor
Therefore feeling obliged to take part and felt unable to refuse to participate
But they were not forced to remain in the experiment and were free to leave anytime

Question 16

Ethics- protection from harm?

Answer 16

A real car crash may have been distressing to the p and therefore caused long term trauma
So a huge strength of the study was that distress to the p’s was avoided by using film clips of car crashes rather than a real car crash

Question 17

Scientific benefit of the research?

Answer 17

Loftus overall justification for the minor ethical issues was in the importance of the overall findings
Greatly developed our understanding the reliability of the EWT and reduced the emphasis placed on criminal trials

Question 18

Social implication- Health

Answer 18

-Affect the health of the wrongly accused
-Stress and emotion of being an eyewitness may have an effect on health meaning greater reliance on the NHS

Question 19

SI- Families

Answer 19

Impact on families of false convictions

Question 20

SI- Education?

Answer 20

-The guilty may go unpunished (free)
-Questioning in pastoral situations in school
-Leading questions in the classroom

Question 21

SI- Law?

Answer 21

-To avoid use of leading questions in police interview, avoiding miscarriages of justice
-Financial cost of retrials and compensation paid to wrongly convicted (£124 bill paid per year), to avoid unreliable inaccurate info being used
-Unreliability of police lineups

Question 22

Alternative evidence- Braun et al 2002?

Answer 22

Found that collage students who had been exposed to an advertisement with misleading info about bugs bunny or ariel had reported seeing them at disneyland in their childhood- despite the characters not being there
-The college students in the groups who had been exposed to advertisement had reported seeing the characters more than the control groups, who had not seen the advertisement

Question 23

Who is alternative evidence?

Answer 23

Braun et al

Question 24

Who are our ecological validty?

Answer 24

Yuile and Cutshall (1986)?
Foster et al

Question 25

Who are our sample evidence?

Answer 25

Schacter et al 1991?