European Legal Thought Flashcards

1
Q

Why do we call English law a common law?

A

Because political authority is so fragmented under the feudal system, law cannot operate based on any single political authority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How did political authority become centralised?

A

King Charles VII introduced central taxation, which allowed him to build a central standing army.

Political authority becomes a normative homogenity. Political authority is exerted equally and totally across a fixed physical boundary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the French Revolution?

A

The people murdered the King and his wife, and set-up a new government that did not have a King or Christianity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What justified the French normative homogenity after the French Revolution?

A

The new French state was defined as a creature of rationality, with law being a device to articulate that rationality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the distinctive elements of the French Civil Code?

A

It was intended to erase French legal history and start a new utopia.

It stands alone: There is no need to refer to any authority outside the code itself. All legal problems can be resolved by interpreting the code.

Synthesized from French legal practice, primarily from Southern France’s Roman law and Northern France’s customary law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How did the French Civil Code reunify the 3 strands of law?

A

Reason: It invents the idea of law as a product of reason and autonomy.

Social order: Since it is derived from French legal practice, there is an element of social order

Will/expression: It is a nationalistic expression of a distinctive, autonomous French state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Why did Carl von Savigny disagree with Thibaut?

What was Carl von Savigny’s view on Germany’s desire for codification?

A

He believed that Germany should not codify the law simply by reasoning from secular natural law.

The law is a historically determined organic product of the German people, an expression of the Volksgeist.

Before any codification, the Germans must first study Roman law, old Germanic law, and recent elements of the contemporary German legal system to extract the relevant principles, before applying them to the modern era to develop the German Civil Code.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the Romanist branch of the German historical school?

A

A scholarship based on Savigny’s historical focus on the need to study Roman law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the Germanist branch of the German historical school?

A

Have to study German sources, not Roman sources.
- Believed that if the law was an expression of the volksgeist, then German, rather than Roman, sources should be the main object of German legal study.

Influenced by the emergence of nationalism in Europe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Who is von Ihering and what was his view on German jurisprudence?

A

Believed that law is primarily a system for reconciling conflicting interests in society

Purpose is the creator of all law; Jurists took into account the competing interests in society as they shaped the law to achieve the best social objectives.

Believed that law is based on and serves social interests in society.

Law enables the individual to desire the common interest as well as his own individual interest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the Berlin School?

A

Associated with Max Weber, who was influenced by von Ihering’s legal sociology

The predominant theorist of modern capitalism and the modern industrial state

Identifies modern emphasis of rational-legal authority

Identifies bureaucracy as modern industrial ideal type
- Bureaucracy is important to governing the modern industrial state

Identifies modern notion of rule of law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is Kelsen’s Grundnorm?

A

The ultimate basic norm from which all other norms are derived. All laws under a hierarchical structure stems from this basic norm.

For example, we have a statute that tells it is illegal to jay walk. That statute is valid because we have another statute that tells us it is legally valid. And finally we have a Constitution that tells us that that statute is also legally valid because it was passed in Parliament. And the legislative supremacy of Parliament is established by the Glorious Revolution of 1688.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was Kelsen’s theory of the state?

A

The State is a purely legal construct. The State is nothing but law.

Its foundation is Parliament. But it is nothing but law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Who is Carl Schmitt?

A

He felt alienated by society’s transformation into a modern industrial state and was nostalgic about the past. This led him to emphasize on German ‘roots’.

He took Weber’s ideas and reshaped them into a more authoritarian vision of society.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What roles did Kelsen and Schmitt play in the German historical school of jurisprudence?

A

Kelsen was a descendent of the Romanist branch.

Schmitt was a descendent of the Germanist branch.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the Kelsen-Schmitt debate about?

A

They debated over the relationship between law and the State.

17
Q

The Grundnorm comes in two dimensions. What are the two dimensions?

A

One dimension is epistemic; The Grundnorm is the epistemic starting point.

Another dimension is historical; A particular law can only be law once another law has been passed. The Grundnorm thus becomes a historical starting point.

18
Q

What was Schmitt’s theory of the state?

A

The State is an ethnic construct, not a legal construct. It is something deeply embedded in what it means to be German. It operates “prior to and is above” law.

19
Q

What did Schmitt dislike about the Grundnorm?

A

He thinks that the Grundnorm doesn’t account for the state of exception.

What gives the Grundnorm its authority? The Sovereign.

In every State, there is a state of exception: a point where law runs out.

When there is a state of exception, the Sovereign decides what the law will be.

The Sovereign derives its authority as a representative of all Germans. It is an extension of what it means to be German in an ethnic and internal sense.

The Sovereign also uses the friend-enemy distinction to support its authority; We are friends because we have a common enemy.

20
Q

What is another name for the French Civil Code?

A

The Code Napoleon, French Code CIvile

21
Q

How did the French Civil Code define the state?

A

The state has a distinct law that applies comprehensively through its entire realm.

22
Q

What is positivism?

A

Law as it is, rather than law as it ought to be.

A belief that morality is separate from law.

23
Q

How does one prove a norm, according to Hans Kelsen?

A

A norm can only be derived from other norms. It cannot be proved to exist factually.

24
Q

What is a norm? (Hans Kelsen)

A

Norms are regulations that determine how persons are to behave.

A norm is an “ought” proposition; it expresses not what is, but what ought to be given certain conditions.

25
Q

What is law? (Hans Kelsen)

A

Positive law is a normative order regulating human conduct in a specific way.

26
Q

What is the significance of selecting a Grundnorm?

A

It has implications in determining the relation of state law to international law.

If the basic norm is in conformity to a state’s constitution, then the state’s legal system will be distinctive from any other states.

But if the basic norm is taken in rellation to international law, there will be a monistic world order, from which each state law will derive.

27
Q

What were the two stages that von Savigny proposed to codify the law?

A

The development of German code to proceed in two stages:

  1. Study Roman law, old Germanic law, and modern German legal practices to identify the universal and fundamental principles of law
  2. Apply these principles to modern society to develop the German Civil Code
28
Q

The Germans intended the German Civil Code to be understood and interpreted by which group of people?

A

Lawyers.

Unlike the French, the Germans felt that it was neither desirable nor feasible to get rid of all lawyers and have a code that could be understood and applied by an ordinary reader.

29
Q

What is the driving force behind French codification?

A

Statism; The need to glorify the new nation-state.

Nationalism; Much of the pre-revolutionary law in France was European, rather than French in origin. This was offensive to the rising spirit of French nationalism.

Centralisation; The need to unify the diverse legal systems in the French regions

30
Q

The French intended the Code Napoleon to be understood and interpreted by which group of people?

A

Ordinary citizens. The French wanted to make lawyers unnecessary.

31
Q

Why was the German codification process thought of as a scientific process?

A

Just as natural data in biology or chemistry could be studied in order to determine more general scientific principles, the data of German law could be studied in order to identify and extract from them the inherent principles of the German legal order.

32
Q

How is the Code Napoleon similar to the German Civil Code?

A

Both served a unifying function, providing a single body of law for the recently unified nation-state.

Both incorporated a sharp separation of powers between the legislation and the judiciary; They were reluctant to allow the judiciary excessive law-making powers through the “facade” of interpretation.