Ethnicity: Internal Factors Flashcards

1
Q

What are the 3 internal factors for ethnicity in education?

A
  1. Anti-school Subcultures.
  2. Labelling, identities and responses.
  3. Institutional Racism.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
  1. (Anti-school Subcultures and Pupils’ Identities) What 3 identities did Archer (2008) give for pupils?
A
  • Ideal pupil identity.
  • Pathologized pupil identity (treating others differently based on non-normative behaviour or characteristics). (Ethnic minorities = more likely to be viewed as demonised or pathologized.
  • Demonised pupil identity.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did Archer (2010) say about Asian girls’ behaviour?

A

Asian girls are submissive, docile and passive (respectful…).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is Shain (2003) say the outcome is to go against this stereotype?

A

Severe punishment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How are Asian pupils praised, viewed and do they achieve success in the right or wrong way?

A
  • Chinese pupils are both praised and viewed negatively.
  • They achieved success in the ‘wrong way’.
  • ‘Negative positive stereotype’.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

(How students respond…) What was Fuller’s (1984) findings from his research studying a group of Year 11 Black girls in a London comprehensive school?

A
  • Untypical → high achievers.
  • Girls’ anger was channelled into the ‘pursuit of educational success’.
  • Didn’t seek approval from teachers.
  • Didn’t limit themselves - in terms of friendship groups.
  • Maintained a positive self image by relying on their own efforts.
  • Students can still succeed even when they aren’t similar in terms of behaviour (when they choose not to conform).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did Mac an Ghaill (1992) find from his study of a group of Black and Asian A Level students?

A
  • Students who had been labelled did not necessarily accept it.
  • Response depended on ethnic group and gender.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did Mirza and Sewell (2000) look at?

A

The effects of social class on ethnic groups in the education system.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did Mirza and Sewell find from data from Youth Cohort studies between 1997 and 1998?

A

Showed there was a strong relationship between social class and achievement in all ethnic groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What else did Mirza and Sewell find?

A
  • In all groups, middle-class children did better than working class children.
  • However, African Caribbean pupils didn’t do as well as pupils in other ethnic groups, even when class was taken into account.
  • Pupils from Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi groups did better.
  • The relative success of pupils from some minority ethnic groups = cultural capital.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
  1. (Labelling and Teacher Racism) What did Gillborn and Mirza find in 2000 about Black pupils?
A
  • In one education authority, Black children were the highest achievers on entry to primary school (20% points above the local average).
  • By GCSE = the worst results of any ethnic group → 21 points below average.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What research did Strand (2010) conduct and what were the findings?

A
  • Analysis of the entire national cohort (over 530,000 7-11 year olds).
  • Found that Black Caribbean boys that aren’t on FSM made significantly less progress than White pupils.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What theory does all of this labelling and teacher racism challenge?

A

All of this challenges cultural deprivation theory → black children do not enter the system underprepared.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What do interactionists focus on?

A
  • Interactionists focus on the different labels teachers give to pupils from different ethnic backgrounds.
  • E.G. Black and Asian pupils aren’t viewed as the ‘ideal pupil’.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What did Gillborn and Youdell (2000) find about ‘racialised expectations’?

A

Teachers are quicker to discipline black pupils than others for the same behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

There is a higher level of exclusions from school for black boys. What did Bourne find that supports this?

A
  • Schools sees Black boys as a threat.
  • Only 1 in 5 excluded pupils achieve 5 GCSEs.
17
Q

What did Osler (2001) find about Black pupils and exclusions?

A

Black pupils more likely to suffer from unrecorded unofficial exclusions. It’s more likely to be placed in PRUs (pupil referral unit).

18
Q

Black pupils are more likely to be placed in low sets due to negative stereotyping. Does Foster’s (1990)study support this?

A

His study supports this theory (negative stereotypes surrounding black pupils’ behaviour).

19
Q

What did Wright find about Asian pupils being victims of teachers’ labelling?

A
  • Studied multi-ethnic primary school.
  • Found that teachers used simplistic language when speaking to them.
20
Q

What are disadvantages in classroom interaction that can affect pupils who are victims of teachers’ labelling?

A
  • Pupils left out of class discussions.
  • Teachers expressing disapproval of customs and mispronunciation of names.
  • Asian pupils are not seen as a threat but a problem that could be ignored (marginalisation).
21
Q
  1. (Institutional Racism) What did Steve Strand (2012) find using data from the Longitudinal Study of Young People in England?
A
  • Found that in Britain, African Caribbean did significantly less in education at the age 14 than their White peers.
  • The study also shows that African Caribbean pupils were less likely to be entered for higher level GCSEs than their White British counterparts.
22
Q

What were the factors that accounted for this?

A
  • African Caribbean pupils were more likely to have been excluded from school and to have had a statement of special educational needs.
  • For every 3 White British pupils entered for higher-tier exams in Maths and English, only 2 African Caribbean pupils were entered.
23
Q

What did David Gillborn (2002) discovers about teachers contributing to making school a racist institution?

A
  • Teachers interpret policy in a way that disadvantages Black pupils.
  • For example, setting schemes for the gifted and talented pupils, and vocational schemes for the less academic all underrate the abilities of Black children, regulating them to low-ability groups, a restricted curriculum and entry for lower-level exams.
24
Q

What has the increased marketisation of schools led to?

A

An ‘A-C economy’.

25
Q

The increased marketisation of schools has led to an ‘A-C economy’. According to Gillborn and Youdell (1999), what does this create?

A
  • According to them, this creates a rationing of education → teachers are forced to focus on those in danger of not realising their potential and fostering them to enable them to achieve a C grade or above.
  • Therefore, they neglect both the ‘no-hopers’ and the ‘high-achievers’, leaving them on their own.
  • Many Black pupils are judged, often unfairly, to be ‘no-hopers’.
26
Q

What did David Gillborn (2008) find about racism affecting ethnic minorities?

A
  • Racism affects some ethnic minorities much more than others.
  • Model minorities, such as Chinese and Indian pupils, who are seen as having positive attitudes towards education, are treated differently from minorities who are seen as a potential problem.
  • Furthermore, institutional racism may be entrenched (a habit, ingrained, unlikely to change) in the organisation of schools and the way that power is distributed within them.
27
Q

What is an example that demonstrates this?

A
  • For example, Ranson (2005) highlights the unrepresentativeness of school governing bodies, which are ‘disproportionately White, middle-aged, middle-class, middle-income, public community service workers’.
  • For these reasons, ethnic inequalities in education are often a low priority.
28
Q

(Evaluation) Racism isn’t linked to low achievement. What did Fuller (1980) find in her study to support this? (Year 11 Black girls)

A

Fuller (1980) studied a group of high-achieving Black girls in year 11 of a London comprehensive and found that the girls resisted the negative labelling that the teachers had imposed on them, and formed a pro-school subculture.

29
Q

What studies used ethnography (a type of research method) and why does it provide them with methodological limitations?

A
  • Wright, Gillborn and Mac an Ghaill.
  • Ethnography involves direct observation of a small group. Because the sample is small, generalisations cannot be made from the findings (applies to all multi-ethnic schools).
30
Q

‘Teachers aren’t racist’. How does Taylor (1981) support this?

A

Taylor (1981) identified many teachers as being sensitive to multicultural issues and was actively concerned about developing a fair policy towards ethnic minorities.

31
Q

The ethnocentric curriculum turned into a … curriculum?

A

Multicultural.
It goes against the old racist stereotypical views that Afro-Caribbean Black individuals are good at music and sports and made no real further advancement.