Ethnicity: Internal Factors Flashcards
What are the 3 internal factors for ethnicity in education?
- Anti-school Subcultures.
- Labelling, identities and responses.
- Institutional Racism.
- (Anti-school Subcultures and Pupils’ Identities) What 3 identities did Archer (2008) give for pupils?
- Ideal pupil identity.
- Pathologized pupil identity (treating others differently based on non-normative behaviour or characteristics). (Ethnic minorities = more likely to be viewed as demonised or pathologized.
- Demonised pupil identity.
What did Archer (2010) say about Asian girls’ behaviour?
Asian girls are submissive, docile and passive (respectful…).
What is Shain (2003) say the outcome is to go against this stereotype?
Severe punishment.
How are Asian pupils praised, viewed and do they achieve success in the right or wrong way?
- Chinese pupils are both praised and viewed negatively.
- They achieved success in the ‘wrong way’.
- ‘Negative positive stereotype’.
(How students respond…) What was Fuller’s (1984) findings from his research studying a group of Year 11 Black girls in a London comprehensive school?
- Untypical → high achievers.
- Girls’ anger was channelled into the ‘pursuit of educational success’.
- Didn’t seek approval from teachers.
- Didn’t limit themselves - in terms of friendship groups.
- Maintained a positive self image by relying on their own efforts.
- Students can still succeed even when they aren’t similar in terms of behaviour (when they choose not to conform).
What did Mac an Ghaill (1992) find from his study of a group of Black and Asian A Level students?
- Students who had been labelled did not necessarily accept it.
- Response depended on ethnic group and gender.
What did Mirza and Sewell (2000) look at?
The effects of social class on ethnic groups in the education system.
What did Mirza and Sewell find from data from Youth Cohort studies between 1997 and 1998?
Showed there was a strong relationship between social class and achievement in all ethnic groups.
What else did Mirza and Sewell find?
- In all groups, middle-class children did better than working class children.
- However, African Caribbean pupils didn’t do as well as pupils in other ethnic groups, even when class was taken into account.
- Pupils from Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi groups did better.
- The relative success of pupils from some minority ethnic groups = cultural capital.
- (Labelling and Teacher Racism) What did Gillborn and Mirza find in 2000 about Black pupils?
- In one education authority, Black children were the highest achievers on entry to primary school (20% points above the local average).
- By GCSE = the worst results of any ethnic group → 21 points below average.
What research did Strand (2010) conduct and what were the findings?
- Analysis of the entire national cohort (over 530,000 7-11 year olds).
- Found that Black Caribbean boys that aren’t on FSM made significantly less progress than White pupils.
What theory does all of this labelling and teacher racism challenge?
All of this challenges cultural deprivation theory → black children do not enter the system underprepared.
What do interactionists focus on?
- Interactionists focus on the different labels teachers give to pupils from different ethnic backgrounds.
- E.G. Black and Asian pupils aren’t viewed as the ‘ideal pupil’.
What did Gillborn and Youdell (2000) find about ‘racialised expectations’?
Teachers are quicker to discipline black pupils than others for the same behaviour.