ethnicity and education Flashcards
what are the external factors for ethnic differences in education
- cultural deprivation
- material deprivation
- racism in wider society
what are the parts of cultural deprivation theory
- language
- family structure and parental support
- attitudes and values
what did bereiter and engelmann find in a study
- claimed that language spoken by low income black american families is inadequate for educational success, arguing it is ungrammatical and disjointed
what are some criticisms of bereiter and engelmanns study
- labov – found that black american speech is perfectly logical
- bell – found their views as anti black linguistic racism
- statistics show that children who do not have english as a first language actually perform slightly better
- demie and mclean – found that language barriers and literacy levels came well behind internal factors like teachers low expectations
how might attitudes and values affect the educational achievement of ethnic minorities
- cultural deprivation theorists see a lack of aspiration as a major cause of underachievement
- most children are socialised into the mainstream culture, which instils aspiration, competitiveness and willingness to make sacrifices necessary to achieve longterm goals. cultural dep theorists believe that some ME group children are socialised into fatalistic subcultures
evaluation of the argument that attitudes and values play a role in educational achievement
- studies show that ME groups tend to have higher aspirations
- platt and parsons – among 7-14 year olds, ME group pupils had higher career aspirations and were more likely to aspire to highly paid jobs
how does family structure and parental support affect educational achievement
- moynihan – because many black families are headed by a lone mother, their children are deprived of adequate care because she has to struggle financially without a male breadwinner. boys also struggle because they lack a role model
what are some criticisms of the family structure and parental support theory
- driver – criticises cultural dep theorists for ignoring the positive effects of black family structures on achievement. he shows the black caribbean family, far from being dysfunctional, provides girls with positive role models of strong independent women. he argues this is why black girls tend to be more successful in education than boys
what does sewell believe
- it isnt the absence of fathers as role models that leads to black boys underachieving, instead its the absence of of fatherly ‘tough love’ (firm, fair, nonabusive discipline)
- this results in black boys finding it hard
to overcome the emotional and behavioural
difficulties of adolescence
- this results in black boys finding it hard
- in this absence, street gangs of over fatherless boys offer black boys ‘perverse loyalty and love’. these present boys with a media inspired role model of anti school black masculinity
- sewell found that greatest barrier to success was pressure from other boys
what did arnot say
- ‘the ultra tough ghetto superstar, an image constantly reinforced through rap lyrics and MTV videos’
evaluation of sewell
- downplays the impact of racism
- gillborn – argues that it is not peer pressure or absent fathers but institutional racism in the education system
how are asian families seen in education
- sewell – indian and chinese families have ‘Asian work ethic’ and place a high value on education
- lupton – adult authority in asian families is similar to the model that operates in schools. respectful behaviour towards adults was expected from children
evaluation of the beliefs about asian families in education
- there is a danger of over generalising about ‘Asian success’
- there are important differences in the achievements of pupils from the different Asian ethnic groups (chinese out perform bangladeshi and Pakistani)
what did mcculloch find out about higher education
- a survey of 16000 pupils found that ME group children are more likely to aspire to go to uni than white pupils
what did lupton find out about white working class families
- teachers reported poorer levels of behaviour and discipline in the white working class schools , despite the fact they had fewer children on FSM (common measure of poverty)
- teachers blamed this on lower levels of parental support and the negative attitude white working class parents had towards education
what did evans argue
- street culture in white working class areas can be brutal and so young people have to learn how to withstand intimidation and how to intimidate others.
- in this context, school can become a place where the power games are played out again
what is compensatory education
- the main policy to tackle cultural deprivation
- the Aiming High scheme focused on increasing the participation of MEG in higher education
- archer et al – its emphasis was on fixing individuals low aspirations
criticisms of cultural deprivation theory
- keddie – victim blaming, MEG children are culturally different not culturally deprived
- labelling theorists argue that it is not low aspirations but rather stereotypical labelling
- critical race theorists argue that the education system is institutionally racist
- material deprivation may have more of a impact
what does palmer argue about MEG and material deprivation
- almost half of all children from ME backgrounds live in low income households, as against a quarter of white children
- members of MEG are almost twice as likely to be unemployed as white people
- MEG households are around three times as likely to be homeless
- almost half of Bangladeshi and pakistani workers earned under £7 per hour, compared with only a quarter of white british workers
why might MEG be at greater risk of material deprivation that results from unemployment, low pay and overcrowding
- many live in economically depressed areas with high unemployment and low wage rates
- cultural factors such as purdah in some muslim households, which prevents women from working
- a lack of language skills and unrecognised qualifications
- asylum seekers may not be allowed to take work
- racial discrimination in the labour market
why might class not override ethnicity
- indian and chines pupils who are materially deprived still perform better than most
- 86% of FSM chinese girls achieved 5 or more
higher grade GCSEs, compared to only 65%
of white girls who were not on FSM
- 86% of FSM chinese girls achieved 5 or more
- modood – while children from low income families generally did less well, the effects of low income were much less for other ethnic groups than for white pupils
why might racism in wider society impact education
- rex – shows how racial discrimination leads to social exclusion and how this worsens the poverty faced by MEG. minorities are more likely to be pushed into substandard housing
what are the three internal factors
- labelling and teacher racism
- pupil identities
- pupil responses and subcultures
how might labelling and teacher racism impact ethnic minority students
- teachers often see black and asian pupils as being far from the ideal pupil
- negative labels may lead to teachers treating ME students differently