educational policy Flashcards
what was educational policy like in Britain before 1988
- the tripartite system
- comprehensive school system
what was the tripartite system
- children would be sorted into one of the three different schools after the 11+ exam
- grammer schools were mainly middle class
- secondary modern schools were mainly working class
- technical schools existed in only a few areas
what was the comprehensive school system
- aimed to overcome the class divide caused by the tripartite system
- the tripartite system was to be abolished and replaced by comprehensive schools that everyone would go to
- not all local authorities decided to make the change so the class divide still exists in some areas
what do functionalists believe about comprehensives
- they promote social integration by bringing children of different social classes together in one school
- more meritocratic because it gives students a longer period to show their abilities
what do marxists believe about the role of comprehensives
- they are not meritocratic but instead reproduce class inequality through labelling and streaming
what is marketisation
- the process of introducing market forces of consumer choice and competition between suppliers into areas run by the state, such as education
how has marketisation created an education market
- by reducing direct state control over education
- increasing both competition between schools and parental choice of school
how did the conservative-liberal democrat coalition government take marketisation further
- by creating academies and free schools
what do neoliberals and the new right think about marketisation
- they like it
- marketisation means that schools have to attract customers by competing with eachother in the market
what are some policies that promote marketisation
- publication of league tables and ofsted inspection reports that rank each school accordingly
- business sponsorship of schools
- schools having to compete to attract pupils
- formula funding where schools get funding per pupil
how does Miriam david describe marketisation
- a parentocracy (ruled by parents)
- in an education market, power shifts away from the teachers and schools and onto the parents
what do whitty and ball argue about marketisation
- policies like exam league tables and funding formula reproduce class inequalities by creating inequalities between schools
what does bartlett argue about league tables
- it leads to cream skimming and silt shifting
- cream skimming – good schools can be more
selective, choose their own customers and recruit high achieving, mainly middle class pupils - silt shifting – good schools can avoid taking less able pupils who are likely to get poor results and damage the schools league table position
what is funding formula
- schools are allocated funds by a formula based on how many pupils they attract.
- popular schools therefore get more funds and so can afford better qualified teachers and better facilities
- unpopular schools lose income and find it difficult to match the teacher skills and facilities of other schools, reducing student numbers which reduces funding further
what is gerwitz’ theory of parental choice
- there are three types of parents
- privileged skill choosers
- disconnected local choosers
- semi skilled choosers
what are privileged skilled choosers
- mainly middle class parents who used their economic and cultural capital to gain educational capital for their children
- they were able to take full advantage of the choices open to them
what are disconnected local choosers
- working class parents whose choices were restricted by their lack of economic and cultural capital