Ethnic Differnces Inm Achivement - External Factors Flashcards
1
Q
- Cultural deprivation
A
- cultural deprivation theory sees the achievement of some ethnic groups as the result of inadequate socialisation in the home.
- the explanation has three main aspects:
1. Intellectual and linguistic skills
2. Attitudes and values
3. Family structure and parental support
2
Q
Intellectual and linguistic skills
A
- cultural deprivation theorists see the lack of intellectual and linguistic skills as a major cause of underachievement for many minority children
- they argue that children from low income black families lack intellectual stimulation and enriching experiences - leaves them poorly equipped for school because they have not be able to develop reasoning and problem solving skills
- bereiter and engelman consider the language spoken by low income black families as inadequate for educational success. They see it it’s ungrammatical, disjointed and incapable of expressing abstract ideas
- there has been concern that children who do not speak English at home may be held back educationally however official stats show this is not a major factor e.g 2010 pupils with English as first language were only 3.2 points ahead
- gillborn and mirza (2000) - note Indian pupils do very well despite often not having English as first language
3
Q
Attitudes and values
A
- cultural deprivation theorists see lack of motivation as a major cause of the failure of many black children. Most children are socialised into the mainstream culture, which instils ambition, competitiveness and willingness to male sacrifices necessary to achieve long term goals. This equips them for success in education
- in contrast, cultural deprivation theorists argue, some black children are socialised into a subculture that instils a fatalistic ‘live for today’ attitude that does not value education and leaves them unequipped for success.
4
Q
Family structure and parental support
A
- cultural deprivation theorists argue that this failure to socialise children adequately is the result of a dysfunctional family structure. E.g moynihan (1965) argues many black families are headed by a lone mother, their children are deprived of adequate care because she has to struggle financially in the absence of a male breadwinner.
- the fathers absence also means that boys lack an adequate roiled model of male achievement.
- Moynihan sees cultural deprivation as a cycle where inadequately socialised children from unstable families go on to fail at school and become inadequate parents themselves.
5
Q
Family structure and parental support - the new right
A
- the new right put forward similar explanations - Murray (1984) argues that a high rate of lone parenthood and a lack of positive male role models lead to the underachievement levels of some ethnic minorities.
- scruton (1986) sees the low achievement levels of some ethnic minorities as resulting from a failure to embrace mainstream British culture
6
Q
Family structure and parental support - pryce (1979)
A
- pryce - also sees family structure as contributing to the underachievement of black Caribbean pupils in Britain. From a comparison of black and Asian pupils, he claims that Asians are higher achievers because their culture is more resistant to racism and gives them a greater sense of self worth. In contrast, he argues, black Caribbean culture is less comprehensive and less resistant to racism. As a result, many black pupils have low self esteem and under achieve.
- pryce argues that the difference is the result of the differing impact on colonialism of the two groups
7
Q
Sewell: fathers, gangs and culture
A
- Sewell (2009) argues that it is not the absence of fathers as role models that leads to black boys underachieving. Instead, Sewell see the problem as a lack of fatherly nurturing or ‘tough love’ (firm, fair, respectful and non abusive discipline). This results in black boys finding it hard to overcome the emotional and behavioural difficulties of adolescence
8
Q
Sewell - absent fathers
A
- in the absence of the restraining influence of a nurturing father, street gangs of other fearless boys offer black boys ‘perverse loyalty and love’. These present boys with a media inspired role model of anti school black masculinity, whose ideal as arnot does describes as ‘the ultra tough ghetto superstar, an image constantly reinforces through rap lyrics and MTV videos’
9
Q
Sewell - interviews and barrier to success
A
- many black boys are subject to powerful antio educational peer group pressure: most of the academically successful black boys that Sewell interviewed felt that the greatest barrier to success was pressure from other boys.
- Speaking ins standard English and doing well at school were often viewed with suspicion by their peers and seen as ‘selling out’ to the white establishment
- as sewell says - ‘the biggest barrier facing black boys is actually black peer pressure. We need to talk about how black students discourage their peers’
10
Q
Sewell and black and aisan students
A
- Sewell argues that black students do worse than their Asian counterparts because of cultural differences in socialisation and attitudes to education. As he puts it, while one groups is being nurtured by MTV, the other is clocking up the educational hours.
- Sewell concludes that black children - particularly boys - need to have greater expectations placed on them to raise their aspirations
- however, critical race theorist e.g gillborn (2008) argue that is is not peer pressure but institutional racism within the education system itself that produces the failure of large numbers of black boys
11
Q
Asian families
A
- while many black families have absent fathers, in Sewell view Indian and Chinese pupils benefit from supportive families that have an ‘Asian work ethic’ and place a high value on education
- likewise, Lupton (2004) argues that adult authority in Asian families is similar to the model that operates in schools. She found that respectful behaviour towards adults was expected from children. This had a knock on effect in school, since parents were more likely to be supportive of school behaviour policies
12
Q
White working class families
A
- white w/c often underachieve and have lower aspirations. E.g, a survey of 16,000 pupils by McCullloch (2014) found that ethnic minority pupils are more likely to aspire to go to uni than British white pupils
- this low level of aspiration and achievement may be the result of a lack of parental support. E.g Lupton studies four mainly w/c schools - 2 predominantly white, one serving a largely Pakistani community and the fourth from a ethnically mixed. Community.
13
Q
What did Luton find in her study of the 4 schools
A
- she found that teachers reported poorer levels of behaviour and discipline in the white w/c school- despite the fact they had fewer children on FSM.
Teachers blamed this on lower levels of parental support and the negative attitude that white w/c parents had towards education - in contrast, ethnic minority parents were more likely to see education as ‘a way up in society’
14
Q
White working class families - evans
A
- evans (2006) - argues that street culture in white w/c areas can be brutal and so young people have to learn how to withstand intimidation and intimidate others.
- in this context, school can become a place where the power games that young people engage in on the street are played out again, bringing disruption and making it hard for pupils to succeed.
15
Q
Compensatory education
A
- the main policy that has been adopted to tackle cultural deprivation is compensatory education. E.g the aim of operation headstart in the USA was to compensate children for the cultural deficit that are said to suffer because of deprived backgrounds