Ethics + Law Flashcards
When can you breach confidentiality for crimes?
- serious crime
- threat to public safety
What does the Road Traffic Act (1988) state?
legal requirement to disclose information to police to identify driver involved in a collision
- initially name + address only
Describe consent in children
16-17 = presumed competent to consent to medical treatment (but not refuse it)
16> = if gillick competent: rights of child to have confidential advice + treatment more important than any right of parent
not gillick competent: person with parental responsibility involved in treatment
Describe confidentiality and consent in adults lacking capacity
owed duty of confidentiality
Mental Capacity Act (2005) = people involved in care should be made aware of wishes/values/beliefs
Describe confidentiality in deceased patients
confidentiality survives death
only break confidentiality:
- to assist coroner
- when disclosure required by law
When can you breach confidentiality?
- consent of patient (implied/expressed)
- patient’s best interests (eg in emergency)
- required by law (eg Road Traffic Act/child protection)
- protection of patients + others (‘public interest’) (eg serious crimes)
What constitutes valid consent?
- patient has capacity to consent to intervention (understand, retain, weigh up + communicate)
- patient appropriately informed (use simple language, complications, material risk)
- must be given voluntarily (free to agree to/refuse)
5 principles of capacity
(PLUMB)
Presumption of capacity
Least restrictive = consider other ways to promote rights + freedom
Unwise decisions = a patient with capacity can make unwise decisions
Maximise capacity = consider pictures/translator - make adjustments
Best interests = if lacking capacity, decisions/actions should be made in best interests
Functional test of capacity
Understand information
Retain information
Weigh up information
Communicate decision
When can treatment be given without consent
- emergency (save life/limb)
- not practicable to communicate with patient + treatment necessary (eg require another medical procedure in surgery + waiting would be detrimental)
- in patient’s ‘best interests’
- risk to public health (communicable diseases)
- always document the decision
What is material risk?
- effect on that patient
- would a reasonable person in patient’s position attach significance to it
(focusses on patient in context of procedure)
Informed consent
permission granted in knowledge of possible consequences
Types of consent
- implied (eg arm offered for venepuncture)
- oral (verbal conversation)
- written (needed for significant/risky + fertility procedures)
What are the challenges in obtaining consent?
- organisational = limited patient time, too much delegation breaks continuity of Dr-patient relationship
- patient = difficulty assessing capacity, understanding what’s important to patient (+ material risk), providing information in simple enough terms
- doctor = lack of up-to-date knowledge on some procedures/treatments
Bolam test
A doctor must provide a level of care that can be expected of an ordinary doctor in that circumstance (ie not the gold standard of a specialist)
Bolitho test
used to scrutinise if actions undertaken by a doctor stand up to logical scrutiny
What are the 3 ethical theories?
virtue ethics
duty ethics (deontology)
consequentialism (utilitarianism)
Describe virtue ethics
balance between extremes (the mean)
‘the good’ = human flourishing
good actions = ones that display virtuous character
Describe duty ethics
adhering to fixed standards
performing duties
Describe consequentialism
outcomes are what matter
no absolute prohibitions
utilitarianism = greatest good/happiness for greatest number
What are the four principles of medical ethics?
autonomy = self-rule, capacity to make reasoned decisions + act on them
non-maleficence = hippocratic oath, do no harm
beneficence = make care of patient first concern
justice = fairness, respect for rights, fair use of resources
What is critical reasoning?
critical application of moral theories as useful tools
no theory will give ‘correct’ answer
decisions don’t just affect patients
identify conflict between principles
What is a fact?
truth can be demonstrated (empirically or by inference)
truth is not a matter of opinion
What is a hypothesis?
believed to be true subject to empirical falsification or verification
What is value judgement?
held to be true but empirical evidence/inference cannot establish truth or falsity
How do you respect autonomy in medicine?
provide accurate + truthful information
facilitate informed consent
maintain confidentiality
When is autonomy and right to confidentiality not absolute?
may be overridden by other concerns, for example notifiable diseases, safeguarding concerns