ethical dilemmaas Flashcards
what are the four ethical pillars
- autonomy
- beneficence
- non-maleficence
- justice
what is autonomy
this is the individuals dignity and the respect of the individuals ability to make decisions for their own health. right to treatment, choice of treatment and treatment refusal. relates to importance of informed consent
what is beneficence
the dentist should be acting in the best interest, doing the greatest good, balancing risks and benefits
what is non maleficence
avoid causing harm and strive to protect the patient from harm
what is justice
fairness, equitable use of resources and equal access to care. individals should be similarly treated. there should be an awareness that an individuals treatment may effect the well being of someone else as a consequence of scarce resources.
what is NICE
the national institute of clinical excellence, which makes choices of how the budget is spent. links to justice and how the treatment of one person could lead to the NHS having less money to spend on others.
what does the general dental council outline as the principles and responsibilities in the practice of dentistry
- putting the patients interests first and acting to protect them
- protecting the confidentiality of patients information
- respecting patients dignity and choices
- cooperating with other members of the dental team and other healthcare colleageues in the interest of patients
- maintaining professional knowledge and competence
- being trustworthy
you are approached by the police for information regarding one of your patients - what do you
if they confirm it is to prevent or detect serious or harmful crime, give it to them. police are not automatically entitled to access patient’s personal data unless there is a court order. it must be documented in the patient’s notes, and only the minimum data is revealed. if in doubt, i would ask the other members of the team about their thoughts on the matter.
what is gillick competence?
this is when a patient has shown they understand the treatment and what it means. only if a patient demonstrates gillick competence can they give consent for a treatment. those over the age of 16 in the UK are assumed to have gillick competence.
the mother of a 17 year old patient calls the practice and asks if her son has been attending appointments with you. he only ever comes alone. what do you do?
he is 17, and so can be assumed to be gillick competent and be able to consent to his treatments on his own without his parents involvement or knowledge.
information regarding his attendance is a confidential matter and can only be disclosed to the mother if the son has consented to the sharing of that information.
insert a case of a patient who is enquiring about assisted suicide what are your thoughts on this case?
according to the suicide act 1961, assisted suicide is illegal.
arguments against it include the financial pressures that may lead to doctors using assisted suicide almost as an easy way out because it frees up beds and other resources. some patients may make the decision irrationally due to distress or pressure from relatives, and they may not have the capacity to make the decision themselves. arguments for assisted suicide include that the patients autonomy needs to be respected. if the patient has the mental capacity to make that decision it should be respected. in some cases it could be argued that it is more humane to end patients suffering with assisted suicide if their quality of life is poor and filled with pain.
in conclusion, this is a very controversial issue and if it was to be legalised, it would need to be tightly regulated. doctors have the responsibilty to maintain beneficence and non maleficence toward patients, which clash quite a lot with an issue such as this. it could allow people to die without pain and suffering, but ultimately there is no way to give an answer that everyone would agree with. if it were to be legalised, like i said, regulations would have to be tight.
a 13 year old patients father calls following his childs appointment he wasnt present at. he wants to know what happened at the appointment. what do you do?
advise him to come to clinic if he wishes to know because you cannot disclose such information over the phone. it may be the case that the father does not have parental responsibility, if him and the mother are not married, in which case i would not disclose information to him.
should HIV positive dentists be allowed to practice?
patient safety in dental settings has been enhanced over past decades, by universal precautions and legal obligations to comply with rigorous infection control procedures.
HIV positive healthcare workers who return to clinical duties should be required to demonstrate they are on combined anti-retorviral treatment and must have achieved undetectable levels of the virus.
what are your views on refusing obese patients/ smokers treatment
is it wrong to deny treatment based on a lifestyle factor? the decision should be taken individually depending on the treatment. there are a variety of different social determinants that could lead to someone smoking or being obese, so holding the patient responsible and denying them care for something that isnt necessarily their fault is morally wrong. it may hinder the success of the treatment, in which case it should be discussed with the patient as part of the aftercare of the surgery. if they were to receive a lung transplant for instance, they should be informed of the dangers that smoking can have on the success of the operation and direct them toward support to help them quit smoking.
should being HIV positive be something that should be disclosed to patients
the disclosure of this information can leave the dentist open to discrimination.
in cases where the risk of viral transmission is deemed negligble and which procedures can be performed safely, informing patients is unnecessary and could cause more harm than good due to dental anxiety and stigmatisation