Ethic Test #2 Flashcards
NORMATIVE ETHICS – 3 TYPES
- Deontology
- Consequentialism
3.Virtue ethics
Deontology (Definition)
Emphasizing duties and external rules in ethical action
Consequentialism (Definition)
Emphasizing the moral desirability of the outcome of actions
Virtue ethics ( Definition)
Emphasizing moral character and intentions behind actions
Virtue ethics’ founding fathers are Plato and Aristotle
This approach persisted in Western moral philosophy until the 18th
century and experienced a revival in the 1950s.
Deontologists normally recognize 2 types of duties:
General obligations are to avoid lying, cheating,
promise breaking, murdering, and torturing.These obligations are owed to all human beings.
Special obligations are those which derive from
one’s having made a promise, signed a contract, or as a result of occupying a unique social role such as being a teacher, doctor or a parent.
Consequentialism( What is)
-The ends justify the means.
-Whether an act is right or wrong depends only on the results
of that act
-The more “good” consequences an act produces, the better or
more “right” that act
Subjectivism
Based on Personal Opinion
Cultural Relativism
Based on Group Opinion
Moral Relativism
The view that moral values or principles are the products of culture; Moral Relativists believe that moral or ethical values and principles vary from culture to culture – that what is right in one culture may be wrong in
another.
Techniques of Neutralization (Sykes & Matza, 1957)
- The Denial of Responsibility
- The Denial of Injury
- The Denial of the Victim
- The Condemnation of the Condemners
- The Appeal to Higher Loyalties
Consequentialism
An ethical theory that determines the rightness of actions by
looking for the alternative that has the best outcome.
Utilitarianism – the greatest good for the greatest number.
(Example - the hospital director making the decision regarding the organ transplants)
Social Contract Theory
Says that people live together in society in accordance with an agreement that establishes moral and political rules of behaviour
Why do people obey authority?
Conditioning (by parents, teachers,
religion)
Respect for the person or role
Trust in the system
Fear of consequences
Reciprocal agreement / Consent
John Rawl’s - Theory of Justice
John Rawls’s theory of justice is a sound theory which says that a well-
ordered society needed a concept of justice as a basic requirement and
that such a concept could be developed by rational individuals behind a veil of ignorance.
A Theory of Justice was published in 1971 by American moral and political
philosopher John Rawls.
The Continuum of Compromise
A perceived sense of victimization can lead to the
rationalization and justification of:
Acts of Omission
Acts of Commission – Administrative
Acts of Commission – Criminal
Entitlement versus Accountability
Loyalty versus Integrity