Equity Flashcards
Porter’s five forces
- Competition
- Substitutes
- Supplier power
- Buyer power
- New entrants
Differences between bills, notes and bonds
- T-bill: maturity of one year or less, is sold at a discount
- Note: maturity of two, three, five and ten years, interest is paid semi-anually
- Bond: maturity of ten years or more, interest is paid semi-anually
Money Vs. Time-Weighted Return
- Money-weighted: IRR
- Time-weighted: HPR = ((MV1 - MV0 + D1 - CF1)/MV0)
- Where: MV0 = beginning market value, MV1 = ending market value,
D1 = dividend/interest inflows, CF1 = cash flow received at period end (deposits subtracted, withdrawals added back)
ex ante
forward-looking
ex post
based on actual results
Ibbotson and Chen model
Ibbotson and Chen model abbr.
- EINFL: expected inflation
- EGREPS: expected growth rate in real earnings
- EGPE: expected growth rate in the P/E ratio
- EINC: expected income component
Unleveraged beta
Leveraged beta
- Operating Income
- g
- Capital expenditure (Capex)
- Net PPE
- EBIT
- ROE x b
- FCInv
- Net Property Plant and Equipment
Arbitrage pricing theory (APT) - Multifactor model
Fama-French model
Fama-French model abbr.
- RMRF: Rm - Rf (Rf = return on the one month T-bill)
- SMB: small minus big, average return on 3 small-cap portfolios minus the average return on 3 large-cap portfolios
- HML: high minus low, average return on 2 high book-to-market portfolios minus the average return on 2 low book-to-market portfolios
Pastor-Stambaugh model
FFM model + LIQ
GICS
Global industry classification standard
Barriers to entry
- Supply-side economies of scale
- Demand-side benefits of scale
- Customer switching costs
- Capital requirements
- Incumbency advantages independent of size
- Unequal access to distribution channels
- Restrictive government policy
Strategic styles
- A classical strategy works well for companies operating in predictable and immutable environments
- A shaping strategy is best in unpredictable environments that you have the power to change
- An adaptive strategy is more flexible and experimental and works far better in immutable environments that are unpredictable
- A visionary strategy (the build-it-and-they-will-come approach) is appropriate in predictable environments that you have the power to change
Return on invested capital (ROIC)
- NOPLAT / Invested capital
- NOPLAT= net operating profit less adjusted taxes (NOP before interest expenses)
- NOPLAT = Operating Income (EBIT) x (1 - Tax Rate)
- Invested capital = Operating assets - Operating liabilities
Return on capital employed (ROCE)
- Operating profit (EBIT) / Capital employed (debt and equity capital)
- Effective tax rate
- Marginal tax rate
- Total tax paid as a percentage of the company’s accounting income instead of as a percentage of the taxable income
- Tax rate an individual would pay on one additional dollar of income
Weak-Form EMH
The weak-form EMH implies that the market is efficient, reflecting all market information. This hypothesis assumes that the rates of return on the market should be independent; past rates of return have no effect on future rates. Given this assumption, rules such as the ones traders use to buy or sell a stock, are invalid
Semi-Strong EMH
The semi-strong form EMH implies that the market is efficient, reflecting all publicly available information. This hypothesis assumes that stocks adjust quickly to absorb new information. The semi-strong form EMH also incorporates the weak-form hypothesis. Given the assumption that stock prices reflect all new available information and investors purchase stocks after this information is released, an investor cannot benefit over and above the market by trading on new information
Strong-Form EMH
The strong-form EMH implies that the market is efficient: it reflects all information both public and private, building and incorporating the weak-form EMH and the semi-strong form EMH. Given the assumption that stock prices reflect all information (public as well as private) no investor would be able to profit above the average investor even if he was given new information
P/E in relation to PVGO
- Trailing P/E
- Forward P/E
- Today’s market price divided by the trailing 12 months’ earnings per share
- Today’s market price divided by a forecast of the next 12 months’ earnings per share
Gordon growth model
(1 - b)
Dividend per share/ Earnings per share
Required rate of return with the Gordon growth model
Two-stage DDM
The H-model
The H-model variables
- H: half life in years of the high-growth period
- gS: initial short-term dividend growth rate
- gL: normal long-term dividen growth rate after
g using ROE
g = b x ROE
/
b = retention rate
H-model required rate of return
ROE decomposition
- NI / Common shareholders’ equity
- (NI / Total assets) x (Total assets / Common shareholders’ equity)
- (NI / Sales) x (Sales / Total assets) x (Total assets / Common shareholders’ equity)
- g = (NI - dividends / NI) x (NI / Sales) x (Sales / Total assets) x (Total assets / Common shareholders’ equity)
PRAT
- Profit margin
- Retention rate
- Asset turnover
- Financial Leverage
PVGO
- PVGO = P0 (intrinsic stock price) - D1 / r
- No growth → D1 / r = E1 / r
FCFF
- NI + NCC - WCInv + Int(1 - tax rate) - FCInv
- CFO + Int(1 - tax rate) - FCInv
- EBIT(1 - tax rate) + Dep - FCInv - WCInv
- EBITDA(1 - tax rate) + Dep(tax rate) - FCInv - WCInv
FCFE
- CFO + Net borrowing- FCInv
- FCFF + Net borrowing- Int(1 - tax rate)
- NI + NCC - WCInv + Net borrowing - FCInv
- NI - (1 - DR)(FCInv - Dep) - (1 - DR)(WCInv)
Cases in which the FCFF model is often chosen
- A levered company with negative FCFE
- A levered company with a changing capital structure
Residual income valuation context
- The company’s expected free cash flows are negative or difficult to predict within the analyst’s comfortable forecast horizon
- Dividends are volatile or the company is not paying dividends
FCFF firm value
FCFE equity value
Constant growth FCFF
Constant growth FCFE
Two-stage FCFF
Two-stage FCFE
Method of comparables - other given names
- Comparables
- Comps
- Guideline assets
- Guideline companies
Molodovsky cycle
Cyclicality of P/Es due to the business cycle
Normalized cyclical EPS - two of several methods
- Historical average EPS - Average EPS over the most recent cycle
- Average return on equity - Average ROE for the most recent cycle times the current book value per share
Inverse price ratio
- Earnings yield - E/P
- Book-to-market - B/P
- Sales-to-price - S/P
- Cash flow yield - CF/P
- Dividend yield - D/P
- TTM
- NTM
- Trailing twelve months
- Next twelve months (based on the average on the current and forecasted EPS)
Thomson first call
- FY1 - current fiscal year - based on the mean of analyst’s forecasts and actual data
- FY2 - following fiscal year - entirely forecasted