epidemiology intro Flashcards
basics of epidemiology
study of distribution and determinants of health related states or events in specified populations and application of this study to control health problems
why observe and screen pop.
Risk estimates, relevance of interventions, accuracy of estimates, comparisons, increased screening increases incidence rate but can decrease mortality
epidemiology triad
time(day, year, ect), place(home, locality, environmental and socioeconomic), person(age, sex, eco status, behaviour ect)
exposure and outcome
exposure- exposure to supposed cause of outcome or possession of characteristic that is a determinant of outcome
outcome- possible results that can stem from exposure to a causal factor or from preventative interventions, identifiable changes in health status
random control trial when can’t you use it
opinions, rare or dangerous(ethics), experiences, mortality and other things you can’t blind test
RCT studies
observational, descriptive and analytical hypothesis generating
interventional studies are experimental usually RCT
Cross sectional studies basics and uses
get a sample and gather all exposure and outcome data at once
health service planning, resource allocation, can measure changes if conducting repeat cross sectional studies
cross sectional study advantages
QCE(quick cheap easy),
measure multiple exposures and outcomes
no loss follow up
generate and test hypotheses
cross sectional disadvantages
standardise measurements
bias responder and recall
associations difficult to interpret
not for rare diseases, short duration or emergent events
point prevelance
period prevelance
no. existing cases/total at risk pop.
at a given point
period prevalence includes new and existing cases not best to use
cohort studies basics
enrol at risk group and measure exposure status and follow over time
cohort study advantages
good for rare exposures, measures more than one outcome, clear temporal relationship(relationship involving time), prospective study minimises bias, ethical and legal
cohort study disadvantages
not good for rare outcomes, retrospective relies on good records, bias if follow exposed group more closely, prospective slow and expensive and loss of follow up
cumulative incidence
no. new outcomes/people at risk
over given time at risk
incidence rate
and benefits
no. new cases/person-at time risk
good for common diseased open population