Epidemiology/Biostats Flashcards
Equation for and definition of Absoulte risk reduction (ARR)
ARR = percentage indiating actual difference in event rate between control and treatment groups ARR= Control Rate - Treatment Rate
Equation and definition of Relative Risk Reduction RRR
RRR = ARR/control rate
%indicating relative reduction in the treatment event rate compared to the control group
Relative risk RR definition and equation
Ratio of the probability of an event occurring in the Tx group compared to control group
Number needed to treat or NNT definition and equation
NNT is number of individuals that need to be tx to prevent a negative outcome in 1 patient
NNT = 1/ARR
A confidence interval that crosses ____ or a P-value > erro cuttoff value _____ denotes a result is NOT statistically signification
crosses the null value (often solid line)
P value >0.05
Study that is RETROspective; looks for odds of a previous exposure on the development of a rare dx manifestation.
Person has rare disease…lock backward at other groups that are otherwise matched, assess risk of exposure
What is a bias of this group?
Case Control Study
Recall bias
Odds ratio are used for Case Control
What is equation?
How is it used?
Start with those that have a disease; then look for chance of having an exposure
Odds ratio = Cases exposed/Cases not exposed
Controls expose/ controls not exposed
Study that is a ‘snapshot’ in time to determine whether or not they have a certain risk factor and PREVELANCE of certain disease of interest.
Cross sectional study
Categorizes patients with and w/o specific disease and compares the risk factor frequency between the two gruops
Case Control Study
Group of case reports regarding individual patients with similiar clinical manifestations or received similar tx; each case described in detail and may be used in rare disease or novel tx
Case Series
Study that follows individuals who do NOT have the dx/outcome of interests and who may or may not have a certain risk factor OVER TIME… study to assess disease development
Prospective cohort study
Occurs when an extraneous variable CHANGES THE DIRECTION OR STRENGTH of the effect the independent variable (exposure or treatment) has on the dependent variable(outcome)
Effect modification
An extraneous variable associated with BOTH the exposure and outcome obscures the association btwn exposure and outcome
Confounding bias
How can you tell the difference btwn effect modification and confounding bias?
Confounding bias has NO change in the strength or direction of the effect is seen with stratification; with randomization you mix up confounding variable
occurs when 2 disease interventions are compared and on intervention diagnoses the disease earlier than the other leading to erroneous presumption that there is an effect on the outcome
Lead time bias
Occurs when trials w/ significant positive results are published but trials with negative/null results are not
Publication bias
What does it mean when the standard error of measurement bars overlap btwn two samples?
Means there is a non-statistically significant difference
The applicability of a study’s results beyond the group that was initially assessed; ‘How generalizable are the results of the study to other populations?”
External Validity
Relates to conclusions regarding cause and effect in a study; answers question ‘are we observing/measuring what we think we are measuring/observing?”; threat to this is counfounding
Internal validity
The ability to detect an effect if that effect exsists. Depends on sample size; bigger is better
Power
the Effect Size = standard deviation
Non overlapping confidence intervals always imply statistically significant DIFFEReNCE BUT; the ones that do overlap:
- 0.39 % (95% -0.58, -0.07)
- 0.51% (95% -0.71, -0.14)
may or may not have statistically significant difference.
Increase for ___when multiple simultaneous hypotheses are tested at set p values
Ie testing multiple secondary endpoints increases probability of erroneously finding a statistically sig result
Type I errors (false positives) or alpha; probability of rejecting a null hypothesis when it is in fact true
Measurement of inter-rater RELIABILITY or extent to which inter-rater agreement is an improvement on change agreement alone
Kappa stastic
Intention to treat analysis is that participants in trials should be analyzed in the groups they were randomized, regardless of whether they received or adhered to allocated intervention and regardless if they withdrew, this helps prevnt..
Crossover and dropout and overall preserves randomization
Represents failure to reject a null hypothesis when it is false. dependent on the power of a study which depends on sample size
Type II error
Phenomenon when pts symptoms are alleviated by otherwise ineffective tx likely due to individual expecting the tx to work
placebo affect
Correlation coefficient (r) ranges from values -1 to +1 which indicates a positive or negative direction of association between 2 variables
0 is _____
____ is a strong association
0 is null value
-1 to +1 is stronger association; -1 is negative correlation while +1 is positive correlation