English Language - Child Language Development Flashcards
Behaviourism
The best way to understand behaviour is to look at the causes of the action and its consequences.
BF Skinners Impact
Behaviourism (1954)
Coined the term operant conditioning.
Operant Conditioning (def)
Changing behaviour by the use of reinforcement which is given after the desired response.
Positive Reinforcement
After a positive action, a positive feedback is given.
This strengthens the behaviour.
Negative Reinforcement and Punishment
Following a negative action, negative feedback is proceeded.
This strengthens behaviour.
Punishment weakens behaviour - being the actual consequence like being shouted at.
Skinners Theory Applied
-Children will imitate caregivers
-If correct they are rewarded through praise, or the reward of being understood
-If wrong they are punished by being corrected or not being understood.
Arguments For Behaviourism
-Children can copy the words their parents say (lexical development) but its harder to tell if they understand the meaning of these words (semantic development)
-Children develop regional accents so they imitate the sounds around them
Arguments Against Behaviourism
-All children will go through the same development stages regardless of parental reinforcement
-Grammar can’t be acquired through imitation
-Children can produce original words and sentences
-Parents rarely punish a child’s linguistic errors
Clarke-Stewart
1973 - Found that children whose mothers talk more will have a larger vocabulary.
Nativism
Argues that nature is the key to language development and that children are able to acquire language.
Chomsky’s contribution
The language you are surrounded with isnt sufficient enough to teach language to a child.
He referred to this as poverty of the stimulus.
Children can produce utterances they have never heard from adults and make virtuous errors.
LAD
The Language Acquisition Device explains how children can understand a sentence they have never heard before.
It suggests we have an innate ability to extract the underlying rules from words being spoken around us.
Virtuous Errors
The over-application of grammatical rules to irregular forms.
e.g:
I goed there
Mummy swimmed
Universal Grammar
All human languages share a similar deep grammatical structure.
Humans are born with innate knowledge of these deep structures.
Pinker’s Contribution
Suggests language is an instinct in the same way spiders know how to weave webs.
An ability unique to human’s that cant be accounted for by invention but rather evolution.
Lenneberg’s Contribution
A Nativist who wanted to address the role of Nurture in his findings aswell.
The LAD needs to be activated with sufficient input before a certain point in the child’s development or they wont learn language.
Arguments for Nativism
-The existence of Universal Grammar (if true) suggests that language is linked to evolution
-Children of all cultures will pass through similar stages (doesn’t matter if they use different ways to teach language they still acquire it)
-Children understand sentences they have never heard.
Arguments against Nativism
-Under-estimates the relevance of social interaction
-Some theorists argue Universal Grammar doesn’t exist.
Feral Children - Genie
Was shut in a room for 12 years.
Very little sound in the house. (no input)
If Genie made any noise she would be beat.
1 month after the escape her language was similar to a 18-20 month child.
Was unable to acquire correct grammar and language past this.
Input Theory
Children will acquire language by being exposed to comprehensible input that is slightly more advanced than their current level.
Bruner’s contribution
LASS- Language Acquisition Support System
(pun on Chomsky’s LAD)
Features of Child Directed Speech
-Clear Turn-taking
-Simplified Vocabulary
-Non-verbal Communication
-Questions and Commands
-Repetition
-Recasting and Expansions
Arguments for Input Theory
-Feral children will not acquire language without any kind of interaction with it
-Without an interactive environment children will be less likely to learn language.
Arguments against Input Theory
-Not possible to determine the link between the structures parents use and their appearances in child language.
-In some cultures parents will interact with their children less and they still develop a normal rate of language.