Endo Failure Flashcards
How is success defined
- ESE guidelines define a successful outcome
- Success means different things to researchers, clinicians and patients
- Technical vs biological outcome
What is a successful outcome according to ESE
○ Absence of pain, swelling and other symptoms
○ No sinus tract
○ No loss of function
○ Radiological evidence of a normal PDL
What is a uncertain outcome according to ESE
○ Radiographic changes remaining the same size or only diminished in size
○ It is advised to assess the lesion further until it has resolved or for a minimum period of 4 years
○ If a lesion persists after 4 years the RCT is usually considered to be associated with post-treatment disease
What is an unfavorable outcome according to ESE
○ The tooth is associated with signs and symptoms of infection
○ A radiologically visible lesion has appeared subsequent to treatment or a pre-existing lesion has increased in size
○ A lesion has remained the same size or has only diminished in size during the 4 year assessment period
○ Signs of continuing root resorption are present
○ In these situations retreatment is advised
When should RCT be checked
should be assessed at least after 1 year and subsequently as required
What are exceptions to unfavorable outcome
• An extensive radiological lesion may heal but leave a locally visible, irregularly mineralized area
• This defect may be a scar tissue formation rather than a sign of persisting apical periodontitis
The tooth should continue to be assessed
What is the issue with determining success
• Means different things to different people
A greater success rate is seen in those with a looser criteria e.g for some simply retention alone was considered successful in which the success rate was 95%
What leads to failure
Most failures occur when tx procedures mostly of a technical nature, have not reached a standard satisfactory for the control and elimination of infection
What are the 4 factors that are leading to failure
pre-op
operative factors
technical complication leading to biological failure
additional factors
What are pre op factors
§ Presence or absence of lesion
□ Vital has best outcome
□ Non-vital without periapical lesion has better prognosis than one with a periapical lesion
What are the operative factors contributing to success
□ Filling extending to within 2mm of radiographic apex
® If short may indicate that disinfection is not adequate and a good apical seal is not created so the outcome is diminished
□ Filling not extruded
® Extrusion = bad outcome
® Apical constriction may be destroyed
□ Well condensed root filling with no voids
Good quality coronal restoration
What is a technical complication leading to biological failure
Coronal leakage due to failure of coronal seal
What are the additional factors that contribute to success
□ Presence of sinus
□ Increased lesion size
□ No perforation
□ Getting patency
□ Penultimate rinse with EDTA (especially with retreatment)
□ Avoiding mixing chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite
Absence of flare up
What are the factors that contribute to success
finding all canals
achieving and maintaining latency
avoiding creation of ledges (iatrogenic)
avoid separation of instruments (iatrogenic0
What leads to creation of ledges
§ Poor planning § Poor access § Poor length control § Forcing instruments § Failure to observe sequence Failure to maintain patency