Elizabeth book 2 Flashcards
why is MQS in theory a political challenge for Elizabeth
- in RC eyes E is illegitimate and therefore has no right to the throne
- MQS has Tudor blood and is RC she has a genuine claim to the throne which her Guise relatives promote
- if E dies MQS is one of her possible heirs
- E was jealous of MQS-pretty and charming
in practise how did MQS turn out to be a threat?
-she fled to England in 1568
-catalyst
-gave Catholics a viable alternative
-the rebellion of the northern earls
-Ridolfi plot
-thorkmorton
-babington plot
however these were only ever plots as Walsingham was on the case
so always limited then executed in 1587
outline the northern rebellion
1569 triggered by the arrival of MQS conspiracy to marry Norfolk her proclaim her right to the throne overthrow e and Cecil however Leicester confessed Norfolk fled then they marched trying to gather catholic support in catholic areas like Yorkshire defeated by government forces had hoped the Spanish would help out privy council demand for Norfolk's execution stopped helping M to get her throne back
outline the Ridolfi plot
1571
Italian banker
following e’s excommunication in 1570
uprisings to replace E with MQS who would marry Norfolk
Included PofS Pope MQS and English noblemen
plan was soon discovered by Cecil
Privy Council persuaded E to call parliament so they could secure the execution of Norfolk and Mary
2 bills: MQS execution and no succession
2 acts: no papal bull in the country and high treason to not say E is queen
1581 modification: treason to not acknowledge E as gov of church
agreed to Norfolk but not MQS
outline the Throckmorton plot
1583
plans
drench Catholics backed by the Spanish and Papal money
put MQS on the throne and start a catholic uprising
Spanish advisor involved
also involved some seminary and jesuits
throkmorton tortured then executed#
bond of associations
Spanish ambassador expelled
1585:expulsion of catholic priests
death penalty for those who helped priests
6 questions were devised -the bloody question
E changed it so James wouldn’t suffer
outline the babington plot
1586
letters allegedly sent by MQS
endorsing the murder of E
set up by Walsingham
Privy council persuaded E had MQS had to be executed
E later argued that the death warrant had been sent without her permission
what happened in: 1568 1569 1570 1571 1572 1574 1583 1585 1586 1587 1588
1568: MQS arrived
1569: revolt of the northern earls
1570: excommunicated by the pope
1571: Ridolfi plot
1572: Bartholomew’s day massacre
1574: seminary priests arrive
1583: throchmorton
1585: pledge to help protestants in Netherlands
1586: Babington plot
1587: MQS executed
188: Spanish Armada
what did government do in: 1571 1581 1585 1587 1593 1594 1602
1571: 3 acts: treason to say e not q, treason to have papal bull, those who fled have 12 months or lose property
1581: 2 acts against Catholics: recusancy fine £20 and higher fines for mass, attempting to convert is treasonable
1585: act against Jesuits and seminary priests ordained by the pope treason if he comes into england
1587: 2/3 of land for recusancy
1593: large gatherings of catholics illegal
1594: no toleration of catholics who are loyal to E
1602: all jesuits must leave
what happened in 1559
-act of uniformity fined 12d for not attending church conformity obedience acceptance haigh: gentle enforcement -act of supremacy had to take the oath of supremacy or loose office not enforced too hard E has full power
what happened in 1560
uniformity demands and the look of churches was brought into line-however some regional variations
what happened in 1571
3 acts of papal bull treason
a reaction to e being excommunicated, MQS and catholic plots
treason to say e is not queen or gov and leave for 12 months and loose lands
what happened in 1581
fine against recusant is increased to £20
what happened in 1585
act against jesuits and seminary priests
enter England is treason
reaction to throkmorton (jesuits and sems involved)
bond of associations
what happened in 1587
2/3s of land lost for recusancy
foreign threat-why the catholic threat increased
1568: MQS
1570: papal bull-e excommunicated
1572: st barts massacre
1585: pledge to help protestants in netherlands
1588: spanish armada
plots which increased the catholic threat?
1569: revolt of the northern earls
1571: ridolfi pot
1583: throkmoroton
1586: babington
when did seminary priests come to england?
1574
historical debate over Catholics
- e is killing just because they’re catholic
- e is killing because of papal bull and rebellions-not following her authority
factors that made Catholics a threat after 1570
- 1570 bull of excommunication (Catholics don’t have to obey her-choice) would be doing God’s work to kill E
- MQS (1568) ready made catholic alternative
- young English Catholics willing to die for their faith eg Throkmorton (1583) and Babbington (1586)
- Duke of Norfolk prepared to ignore e and marry MQS
- Spanish ambassador getting involved (Ridolfi, throchmorton, babbington)
- William allen and the sem (1574) they revive catholic communities and encourage recusancy
- didn’t know how string sem and jesuits are-they’re underground
- priests are involved in plots-not keeping religion and politics separate
- abroad that catholic threat is increasing-fall out with spain over treasure ships tyhen pirates they have an army in Netherlands france st barts massacre (1572) in 1585 help protestants in netherlands
- spanish aramada (1588)
- preists and the bloody q
ways which Catholics were not a threat after 1570
- most Catholics ignored the papal bull (1570)
- didn’t want to risk their lives
- MQS not a valid alternative-naughty behaviour
- majority willing to pledge loyalty to queen
- bond of associations-protestants were united
- spanish had their own problems
- majority of priests kept out of politics
- catholic missions never converted only revived
- time-over time people converted and the priests became more enthusiastic
- laws against recusancy-wasn’t worth it (12d-£20-2/3 of lands)
- catholic families lost influence
- laws were clear cut and targeted
- persecution was effective
- Walsingham did a good job
- death of MQS (1587)
- spanish armarda
what does Doran think abouth Catholicism
“wean the population away from its traditional beliefs”
“government had considerable success”
“the danger of catholic was exaggerated. the vast majority were loyal to queen and country”
“polarized process”
“the decline of Catholicism was a gradual but inevitable process”
“the majority drifted into conformity”
Haigh’s views on Catholicism
“marian priests kept alive a variety of catholic rituals and practises”
Bossy
“4jesuits and 120 sem” “influence was great”
what was the aim of Elizabeth’s religious foreign policy?
-more of hvii than a hviii
aim: keep england secure
however she didn’t want to be perceived as weak and unimportant
doesn’t want a religious foreign policy does’t want to become a porn via marriage
cautious and reactionary
why so soft?
not got the money
main security feature-island
outdated weapons ect
got reasonable navy