Electromyography for Differential Diagnosis Flashcards
What IS EMG?
Components broken down
- Graphy→ measurement & analysis
- Electro→ electrical properties and signals
- Myo→ muscle*
3 Types of EMG:
- EMG Biofeedback
- Kinesiologic EMG
- Diagnostic EMG=> EDX***
Basic Definition:
EMG Biofeedback
- Electrical detection of mm activation & provides qualitative info on status of muscle contraction
- GOAL: reduce pain/spasm OR improve motor control & strength
Basic Definition:
Kinesiologic EMG
- Fine wire intramuscular & surface electrodes
- Analysis of activation of mm’s w/in postural tasks, functional mvmts, work, conditions, tx/training regimes
- Think videogames!
- Researchers, sport scientists, graphic artists, product designers*, rehab practitioners
Basic Definition:
Diagnostic EMG=> EDX*
- Electrodiagnostic Examination
- 1.Needle EMG & 2.Nerve Conduction Studies (NCS)
- Analysis of depolarization of nerve & mm’s to determine functional integrity of NMSK system and Peripheral System
2 Components of EDX (Dx EMG)
- Needle EMG
- Nerve Conduction Studies (NCS)
EDX used in conjunction w/:
- w/ Hx, clinical exam and other tests to establish definitive dx** in **peripheral neurologic and mm disorders
Medical Necessity of EDX
Pt Signs, Symptoms, & Hx that warrant EDX
See pics and common themes!!!
Medical Necessity of EDX
Common Medical Dx where EDX are Utilized:
see pics and note the differences and similarities in Dx’s !!!
EDX vs. Other Assessment Tools
How do they compare?
Looking @ Sn and Sp
- Sn== our TRUE POSITIVE rate
- opp would be False Negatives
- SP== our TRUE NEGATIVE rate
- opp would be False Positives
Ex. Clinical Scenario 1
- Diff Dx?
- B CTS vs peripheral polyneuropathy
- More approp interventions to address recent exacerbation?
- Tx hand dysf as per CPG
- Education & referral to PCP for med mgmt
Clinical 1 and outcomes of EDX
-
Outcomes:
- ID presence of nerve injury or mm disease
- ID which nerves or muscles are damaged
-
Characterize lesion
- Fiber type & severity
EDX Component
Nerve Conduction Studies
2 Functions:
- Measure how well a peripheral nerve can conduct an induced stimulus=> evoked potential
- Electrically stimulate/activate nerve @ various pts along superficial path of nerve & record output @ target organ
The second function of Nerve Conduction Studies is Electrically stimulate/activate nerve @ various pts along superficial path of nerve & record output @ target organ
More to this?
- Target organ:
- Muscle→ MOTOR nerve conduction study
- Skin→ SENSORY nerve conduction study
-
ENTIRE nerve pathway→ Late responses (H-reflex & F-wave)
- Stim nerve distally & record output of nerve→ cell body→ muscle
NCS: What does this look like?
Ex. EDX Component: NCS
Ex. Median Motor nerve
Median Motor Nerve
Recording from APB w/ stim @ wrist, elbow, axilla
EDX Component: NCS
Median f-wave vs. Tibial H-reflex
GOOGLE DIFFERENCE bw F-wave and H-reflex
see pics
F- Wave
- Useful for evaluating conduction probs in prox region of nerve
- One of several motor responses which may follow direct motor response evoked by electrical stim of peripheral motor or mixed nerves
- Always preceded by a motor response
- Best obtained in small foot and hand mm’s.
- Helpful w/ presence of polyneuropathy
H-reflex
- Can be accomplished w/ slow, long-duration stimuli w/ gradually inc’ing stim strength
- Provide nerve conduction measurements along entire length of nerve
- Can demo abnorms in neuropathies and radiculopathies
- easily obtained in Soleus (w/ post tib nerve @ pop. fossa), FCR (w/ median nerve stim @ elbow), Quads (w/ femoral nerve stim)
NCS QUANTitative Data
3 MOST COMMONLY Used:
- Distal Latency→ Speed, Strength of nerves
- Conduction Velocity → How fast and distance traveled
- Amplitude→ How strong
NCS QUANTitative Data:
3 MOST COMMONLY Used:
Distal Latency (think speed, strength)
-
Time it takes for electrical signal to reach target tissue from the most distal pt of stimulation
- Miliseconds (ms)
- Onset latency (O)→ MNCS (motor), SNCS (sensory)
- Peak latency (P)→ SNCS (sensory)
- Miliseconds (ms)
NCS QUANTitative Data:
3 MOST COMMONLY Used:
Conduction Velocity (think how fast + distance traveled)
- Time it takes for electrical impulse to travel BETWEEN 2 given points along course of nerve
- Meters per second (M/s)
NCS QUANTitative Data:
3 MOST COMMONLY Used:
Amplitude (think how Strong)
- Measure of how many working axons are activated when nerve is electrically stim’d
- Microvolts or milivolts (uV or mV)
- Onset to peak (O→P)→ MNCS, SNCS
- Peak to trough (P→T)→ SNCS
NCS QUANTitative Data:
3 MOST COMMONLY Used:
EXAMPLE CHART
see pics!!!
NCS Data Interpretation
What does Myelin do?
INC speed of nerve conduction!
NCS Data Interpretation
If its a prob w/ “how fast”
Myelin problem
NCS Data Interp.
If its a problem w/ SIZE (amplitude)
Usually AXON problem
NCS Data Interpretation
Absolute vs. Relative values of patient
Compare each relevant data point to Normal
- Absolute values→ determined by research
- Relative values of patient→ Ipsilat an Contralat***
NCS Data Interpretation
SLOW speed of nerve impulse @ only one location of nerve==>
Focal demyelinating injury of THAT nerve @ THAT location
NCS Data Interpretation
SLOW speed of a nerve impulse @ MULTIPLE loc’s of a nerve and/or multiple nerves==>
Widespread demyelinating disorder
NCS Data Interpretation
LOW amplitude potential of nerve impulse @ ALL stimulation sites==>
Probable destroying of nerve axons/muscle fibers***
Scenario I EDX Data
- B (R>L) median motor slow (prolonged) distal (wrist) latency
- B (R>L) median sensory slow wrist latency
- B (R>L) median sensory slow wrist to digit 3 & wrist to palm velocity
- All other NCS & EMG performed Normal
Influence on Mgmt
- Even though pt has established medical dx of DM, the condition has not grossly affected the function of the large nerve fibers (motor & sensory)
- Tx of impaired median N. according to CPG should improve pts sx’s
- EDX CTS severity classification inverse relationship w/ success of conservative Tx
- Majority (58%) of hand sxs required EDX BEFORE initial CTR consultation***
Clinical Scenario #2:
Clinical Questions
- Diff Dx?
- L. C/S radiculopathy vs. L. CTS vs. L. plexopathy
- Tx Focus?
- Neck?
- Wrist?
- Shoulder?
Final 2 Outcomes of EDX:
ID Location of insult
Determine stage of tissue inflammation
GOLD STANDARD for assessing Axonal Integrity
Electromyography (EMG)
EMG:
FACTS
- Det’s integrity of all components of a motor unit:
- alpha motor neuron, AXON (EMG is gold-standard), all mm fibers innervated by that motor neuron
- INVASIVE→ needled recording electrode inserted thru skin and fascia INTO various depths of mm
- Needle acts as antenna, detecting electrical impulses of motor units & machine displays as waveforms
EMG (GOLD STANDARD for axonal integrity)
Examines 3 states of the muscle:
- @ Rest
- W/ MIN voluntary contraction
- INC’ing effort of voluntary contraction
EMG Qualitative & Quantitative Data
3 Assessments:
- Resting assessment
- MINIMAL effort isometric muscle contraction
- MOD→MAX isometric muscle contraction
EMG Qualitative & Quantitative Data
Resting Assessment
Norm vs Abnorm
- NORMAL→ electrical silence @ rest
-
ABNORMAL→ presence of spontaneous potentials
- Fibrillation potentials (fibs) & Positive sharp waves (PSW) most common***
EMG: Resting Assessment
MOST COMMON ABNORMAL findings:
2:
Fibrillation potentials (fibs)
Positive sharp waves (PSW)
EMG Qualitative & Quantitative Data
Minimal effort isometric contraction
- Analyze shape, amplitude & duration of >12 indiv. motor unit APs (MUAPs)
- Normal parameters for motor unit shape, amp, duration
- >30%* of MUs need to be abnormal in order to label mm as such
EMG Qualitative & Quantitative Data
MOD→MAX isometric muscle contraction
- Observe rate of MU recruitment & # of MUs recruited
- Depends on pt participation/motivation*** (obviously, probably doesn’t feel good!!!)
EMG ABNORMAL Resting Assessment Potential==>
FIBS/PSW***
EMG ABNORMAL Resting Assessment Potential==> FIBS/PSW
- Physiologically the SAME, but appear as diff waveforms
- Caused by mm fiber denervation→ electrical discharge of mm fiber w/out input from nerve
- Severity subjectively graded 1+ to 4+
EMG MINIMAL EFFORT ISOMETRIC MUSCLE CONTRACTION
ABNORMAL MU AP (Action Potential) Ex.
- SIZE of MUAP (motor unit action potential) DOES NOT match muscle effort
- >30%* of MUAP observed in a mm have abnormal size, width, and/or shape
EMG: MODERATE-MAXIMAL ISOMETRIC CONTRACTION
ABNORMAL Recruitment & Interference Pattern Ex.
Just same MU firing over and over, no recruitment of new MUs
-
Reduced recruitment
- Initial MUAP are LG.
- As effort inc’s, FEW/NO other MUAP activated, existing ones fire faster
EMG Interpretation Ex.
see pics and NOTE COLORS!!!
Scenario 2 EDX Data
EMG + Interpration
Scenario 2 EDX Outcomes & Impression
Scenario 2 EDX Outcomes & Impression
Scenario 2 EDX Influence on Management:
- Evidence of extensive injury to lateral cord of brachial plexus
- Primary intervention→ anterior cervical triangle & shoulder
- Communicte w/ referring phys. for imaging
- Passive tx/preventative measures/edu. for post. neck & wrist
- High agreement bw EDX & MRI for plexopathies***
- EDX optimal test to localize, grade, & provide pathophysiologic info on brachial plexus lesions***
Clinical Scenario #3
2 pts similar, but different as well
BOTH pts present w/ high clinical suspicion of ulnar neuropathy @ elbow “cubital tunnel syndrome”
BOTH ask “When am I going to get better?”
Name the 6 Clinical Outcomes of EDX
- ID presence of nerve injury/mm disease
- ID which nerve(s) or muscle(s) are damaged
- Characterize the lesion
- ID the location of insult
- Determine the stage of tissue inflammation
-
Estimate prognosis
- *Determine cellular components injured
Peripheral Nerve Cell Components
-
Cell Body
- Generate nerve impulse
- Ant. horn cell
- DRG
- Generate nerve impulse
-
Connective Tissue
- Protection
-
Myelin (Schwann Cells in PNS!!!)
- Protection
- INC speed of nerve impulse
-
Axon
- Transmits nerve impulse
What heals faster?
Myelin regen vs. Axon regen
Myelin regeneration!!!
Comparing Nerve Structure Repair
REmyelination==>
4mm/day ea. segment
Comparison of Nerve Structure Repair
Axon regeneration==>
1mm/day entire axon
SLOOOOOOOOW***
Prognostic Value of EDX
EDX can ID presence of:
3:
- Demyelination== Excellent to Good prognosis
- Axon Degeneration== Fair to Poor prognosis
- Axon reinnervation of mm fiber== Recovery underway/Intervention successful
Prognostic Value of EDX
EDX can ID presence of:
Demyelination
Excellent→Good prognosis for recovery
- Local→ slowing @ one location
- Diffuse→ slowing @ multiple locations and/or nerves
- Conduction Block→ slowing w/ changes in amplitude (potentials STOP conducting)
Prognostic Value of EDX
EDX can ID presence of:
Axon Degeneration
Fair→Poor prognosis for recovery
- DECd amplitude @ all nerve sites
- Spontaneous EMG potentials
- LESS MUs w/ faster firing rates (you saw this, just keeps repeating over and over w/ same MU….no NEW recruitment!)
Prognostic Value of EDX
EDX can ID presence of:
Axon Reinnervation of muscle fiber
Recovery underway/Intervention Successful
- Abnorm shape, amplitude, & duration of MUs==> mm fibers reorganizing (GOOD THING!)
- DECd amp @ all nerve sites
KNOW THIS CHART!!!!
Demyelination == QUICKER recovery vs. Axon loss
see chart!!!!!
Scenario 3A (baseball pitcher) EDX Findings
Vs.
Scenario 3B (retired couch potato) EDX Findings
Scenario 3 EDX Outcomes, Impression, Management
SEE how they are different!!!!
Note the diff’s in severity of injury and treatment plans and prognoses!!!
REVIEW: Clinical Implications of EDX
6 Outcomes of EDX
- ID presence of nerve injury/mm disease
- ID which nerve(s) or muscle(s) are damaged
- Characterize lesion
- ID the location of insult
- Determine the stage of tissue inflamm.
- Estimate prognosis
REVIEW: Clinical Implications of EDX
NCS optimal for:
Optimal for detecting DEMYELINATION***
OPTIMAL for detecting demyelination
NCS
REVIEW: Clinical Implications of EDX
Optimal for detecting AXON DAMAGE (WORSE prognosis)
EMG
Optimal for detecting AXON damage
EMG
NCS optimal for detecting______
Demyelination
EMG optimal for detecting _______
AXON DAMAGE (worse prognosis)
REVIEW: Clinical Implications of EDX
EDX Facts:
- VERY HIGH Sn & Sp @ detecting UE compression neuropathies encountered by PTs***
- Results can alter pt mgmt***
Summary of EDX Influence
Did it work? and for what?
see pics + highlights***
Components of an EDX Report:
- Pt demographic, reason for referral/Hx & clinical exam
-
NCS Data:
- Numerical table format→ latency, amplitude, velocity
- norm values
- temperature
-
EMG Data:
- Table format description→ spontaneous & volitional activity of ea. muscle
- Summary of findings
-
Impression*
- Nerve(s) injured, Location, Axon/Myelin, Motor/Sensory, Chronicity, Severity***
EDX Report
Impression of Findings tells you….
Nerve(s) injured, Location, Axon/Myelin, Motor/Sensory, Chronicity*, Severity*
Role of PT in EDX
see pics
Prolonged F-wave
Prolonged F-wave latency consistent w/ demyelinating of the motor axon bw the stimulus site and the recording muscle
Ex. Demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy or demyelination in other causes of radiculopathy