Electoral Systems Flashcards
Supplementary Vote
Used to elect the London Mayor
SV has voters rank candidates preferentially. Candidates with over 50% automatically win, but if no one gets that, then 2nd preference votes from the biggest loser are redistributed until there is a winner
In the 2016 London elections, Khan won 42% of 1st preferences and 2nd preferences gave him 57%
Advantages of Supplementary Vote (x5)
Ensures broad support for the winner
Discourages adversarial campaigning
Easy to use
Gives the winner a clear mandate
Would maintain the MP-Constituency link
Disadvantages of Supplementary Vote (x1)
Does not necessarily give the winner the popular vote
Advantages of Referendums (x3)
Allows voters to directly contribute to decision-making
Lord Hailsham argued that they act as a ‘check’ on the UK’s ‘elective dictatorship’
Increase participation (2016 EU Referendum turnout of 72%), entrench reforms and raise political awareness
Referendums
Direct democracy within a representative system
Parliament must approve the results of referendums, maintaining sovereignty
Referendums are used for resolving constitutional issues or internal party disputes such as 1998 Good Friday agreement, 2016 EU, 2011 AV, 2014 Scottish
Disadvantages of Referendums (x5)
Challenge parliamentary sovereignty
Expensive, as the Cabinet Office stated that the 2016 EU Referendum cost £142.2m
Unqualified to vote on certain issues
Low participation when issues are complex e.g. 2011 AV referendum had 42.2%
As governments choose whether referendums are held, it may be that they are only held on issues at the government fell comfortable letting the public choose, rather than issues that is RIGHT for the public to get to choose on
Additional Member System
2 votes, one for an MP using FPTP, and another for a party with a proportional system
AMS is used in the Scottish Parliament and the Welsh Assembly
Advantages of AMS (x4)
More representative than FPTP
Retains FPTP’s MP-Constituency link
Increases voter choice, as Voters can ‘split their tickets’
Minority parties are more successful, as the Green Party won 6 seats in the 2016 Scottish Parliament
Disadvantages of AMS (x4)
AMS creates 2 types of MPs, and the legitimacy of MPs elected through PR votes for the party is questionable and would become politicised
As political parties assign the PR seats, it is questionable as to how these PR MPs can be held accountable
When AMS was first used in Scotland, Wales and London there were lots of spoilt ballots, as it was confusing
AMS increases likelihood of coalitions, and though some people may see this as goods, it can cause gridlock and end up with everyone unhappy
Single Transferable Vote
Voters number their choices 1,2,3 and a candidates must achieve a quota set by the DROOP FORMULA
Once candidates reaches the quota, their 2nd preferences are redistributed
STV is used to elect the Northern Ireland Assembly as its highly PR helps to reduce divisions between unionists and nationalists
Advantages of Single Transferable Vote (x4)
Produces a proportional outcome and increases chance of coalitions. Northern Ireland Assembly
Gives voters lots of choice, as they have multiple votes
Removes ‘safe seats’ and ‘wasted votes’
Helps minority parties
Disadvantages of the Single Transferable Vote (x3)
STV may be confusing to voters, reducing participation and causing a high level of spoilt ballots
Increases the likelihood of coalitions, which can be bad as it causes gridlock and leaves everyone unhappy
Easier for extremist parties to be elected
Functions of Elections (x5)
Allow the public to choose their representation
Provide a legitimate government
Holds MPs to account
Participation
Opportunity to influence policy
Advantages of FPTP (x5)
Provides an MP constituency link
Prevents disproportionate influence from small extremist parties
Normally produces a clear strong and stable government
Easy to use and fill out ballot
In 2011 AV Referendum, 68% of votes support using FPTP
Disadvantages of First Past the Post (x4)
In 2010,2015, and 2017 there were coalitions, small majorities or hung parliaments
FPTP is not proportional. The 2015 Belfast South MP won with 24.5% of the vote. In 2005, Tony Blair had 55% of seats, but 35% of votes
Creates ‘safe seats’, and thus voters in ‘swing/marginal seats’ have more power
FPTP favours parties with support that is geographically concentrates, such as the SNP, and hurt parties such as UKIP