electoral systems Flashcards
what is the difference between electoral systems and electoral laws?
electoral systems is how votes are converted into seats
electoral laws is how elections are conducted
what are the goals of the electoral system from the perspective of THE PUBLIC/EXPERTS?
- representation of voters
- electing qualified representatives
- producing stable and strong government
what are the goals of the electoral system from the perspective of POLITICAL PARTIES?
- to stay or get into power
what are the other goals of the electoral system?
- diverse representation
- strong voter participation
- variety of party choices
- simple or complex voting system
- candidate based or party based system
- single party or coalition government
what are the views of representation?
- microcosm - parliament reflecting population
: more diverse representation for everyone - principal agent views - people delegating power to those they want
: mostly elites
: not enough representation
what are the types of ballot structure?
- alphatical
- catergorical
- randomised
- ordinal
what are the types of electoral systems?
- non-proportional
- SMC/SMP
- TRS
- AV
- PMB - proportional
- PR list
- MMP
- MMR
- PR STV
all about SMP/SMC
- more votes to win
- only one person gets elected in that district
- candidate-based
good stuff:
- simple voting structure
- stable single party gov
- geographic representation
bad stuff:
- wasted votes
- not everyone gets represented
- promotes individualism
- winning party monopolizes representation
what is duverger’s law?
1 person elected but 2 party come out of it because merge
all about trs (two round system)
- anti dote to smp
- only one person gets elected
- must have a certain reach before qualifying for next round
good stuff:
- centrism
- majority wins not plurality
bad stuff:
- too much work to do two rounds
- voters fatigue
- top candidates might be from same spectrum leaving voters with no choice
all about av (alternative vote)
- ranking system
- only one person elected
good stuff:
- smaller parties can get voted in
- people can rank based on their preference so even if they don’t get first choice elected, the 2nd choice might be okay with them
- only one day
bad stuff:
- still only one person gets in
- illusion of choice
- never rank all means vote not counted
- wasted votes
- smaller parties can get excluded when they are unable to get seats due to low ranks
all about pmb (plurality member block)
- heavily biased
- multiple members of a party get elected into power
good stuff:
- candidates elected as team so more collective good matches sg
- diverse candidates that people can relate to one or the other
bad stuff:
- still only one being elected in
- extremely disporportional as 1 extra vote can get the whole team in
- amplifies gains; 1 tiny vote makes big changes
all about pr list
- seats based on votes earned
- party centered
- more parties can get in because based on votes
- coalition gov more common
- more diverse representation
- no single representation per geographic area
- closed pr list
: party based electoral system
: voters have no say in candidates
- ordered pr list \: Chance for voters to have some influence on the order in which candidates are elected for the party, but it’s not an open system where they have complete control over the selection - open pr list \: candidate and party based \: voters got more say
all about mmp and mmm
mmp: mixed member proportional
1. voters have 2 votes; 1 for party and 1 for candidate
2. can don’t vote from same party
3. party based on pr list, candidate to represent constituency based on smp
mmm: mixed member majoritarian
1. also 2 votes
2. some seats based on pr but it makes such a small impact
3. not so proportionate cos follows smp
4. mostly smp
how does largest remainder work?
- hare quota, droop quota
- central feature: electoral quota
- counting process in 2 rounds
- parties with votes exceeding quota are awarded seats. quota subtracted from total vote. parties left with greatest number of votes which is the largest remainder are given seats in order of vote size.
- gives smaller parties a chance, more proportional