EIA and sustainable development Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Define: Sustainable development

A

Brundtland report 1987

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Where does EIA fit in sustainability?

A
  • Principle 4 for the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development (UN, 1992) states that in order to achieve sustainable development, environmental protection shall constitute an integral part of the development process and cannot be considered in isolation from it.
  • This firmly establishes the link between the environment and development. It requires that the potential environmental impacts of developments must be investigated in order to manage them
  • To achieve sustainable development existing environmentally harmful developments must be managed as best they can, but now developments must be designed to have the smallest practicable negative impact or even a positive one

> first time on global stage between human and environmental impacts
highlights the need for on-going environmental impacts that needs continuous management.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are some key quality issues associated with SD?

A
  • Since the outcomes of an EIA hinges on the determination of significance of environmental impacts, significance itself becomes a critical issue
  • EIA’S use as an effective tool in contributing to sustainable development depends greatly on what is determines as significant.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are some key elements of EIA and SD?

A
  • The precautionary principle (better to not go ahead if activity is risky)
  • Ecological limits (trying to not bring systems beyond a tipping point)
  • Intra and inter-generational equity (Brundtland)
  • Partnerships and participation
  • Accountability and transparency (Involving stakeholder)
  • Strategic issues and cumulative effects

Sets the framework for EIA
- Successful in moving towards SD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Briefly describe the background of Mozambique?

A
  • one of worlds poorest countries
  • possibly rich in offshore oil and gas
  • extremely low socioeconomic bas
  • rich in biodiveristy
  • newly formed policies, legislation and institutions with regard to exploitation of mineral resources and environmental protection
  • wealth of mineral resource- some of which are already being exploited
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe the hydrocarbon situation in the hydrocarbon project? (Henriques et al., 2008)?

A

Its a very valuable resource in a very sensitive area

  • the challenges of exploration for hydrocarbon resources in one of the most unspoiled marine environments in the world
  • supports extensive subsistence livelihoods
  • alternative economic activities such as tourism, which form a cornerstone of the present day economy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the agreement made between Mozambique Gov and Sasol Petroleum Sofala ltd?

A
  • An exploration and production concession contract (EPCC) was signed in respect to offshore blocks 16 and 19.
  • Sasol appointed Consultec in partnership with Environmental Resource Management Southern Africa (ERM), to undertake EIA for conducting exploration activities.
  • Blocks 16 and 19 located adjacent to the Bazaruto Archipelago which forms part of a larger bioregion, the western indian ocean region
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How was ecology and fisheries impacted?

A
  • area contains ecologically important coastal and marine habitats: beaches, mud fats, extensive mangrove forests, coral reefs and open waters
  • These habitats provide important breeding, nesting and foraging grounds for various species of marine turtles and marine mammals such as whales and dugongs
  • Dugongs: the largest remaining viable population in the western indian ocean region is believed to occur in the Bazaruto Archipeligo
  • The Bazaruto national park was established in 1972

Semi-industrial and industrial fisheries also frequent shallow and deep waters within the project area.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How was tourism impacted?

A
  • Tourism in and around the park has developed into an important component of the local economy
  • the bazaruto area has been identifies as a priority area for tourism investment in Mozambique
  • The coastal and marine environment supports the livlihood of impoverished inhabitants
  • a large proportion of the local population id either directly or indirectly involved in fishing activitis with many of the inhabitants relying on marine resources as a food source
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How did the project assess the oil?

A
  • Seismic surveys followed by exploration drilling and well testing activities in an area totalling approximately 10,000km2
  • EIA’s are generally conducted in respect of single activities, either seismic surveys or drilling activities
  • Similarly, they are conducted in respect of well defined geographical areas
  • EIA combined the assessment of: two different exploration activities- the impacts of which had to be assessed for two different environments (Shallow and deep).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was Mozambique’s precautionary principle?

A

During scoping: key gaps in information
- Threatened dugong population
- the sensitive artisanal fishery
- extent and importance of local tourism sector
> EIA recommended to abandon shallow water exploration until further information obtained

Recommendation accepted and before EIA was completed

proponent response:
- undertake extensive effects monitoring (fish catch surveys, noise, coral reef monitoring, tourism surveys etc) during implementation of deep water phase to understand the actual impacts and how these may relate to the impacts of shallow exploration.

  • year long study into dugong- distribution, habitat, population dynamics
    Results: fish catch and dugong= shallow water critical habitat supporting artisanal fishing and threatened dugong’s

Shallow no longer to be explored.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What were the ecological limits?

A
  • seismic noise limits that would either interfere with marine mammals communication, result in a startle response of mobile fauna or result in physical damage or injury
  • Recommendations included spatial migration (buffer zones for coral reefs)
  • temporal mitigation: avoidance of peak migration and breeding seasons
  • followed up with monitoring activities during the implementation phase, including MARINE MAMMAL OBSERVERS on board seismic vessels during implementation and noise monitoring at sensitive marine sites.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What were the intragenerational equity limits?

A

Intragenerational equity present

  • compensation paid to all stakeholders that lodged claims directly affected by deep water seismic activity
  • Misunderstandings: compensation procedures could have been more adequately explained- limited communication during implemenation phase resulted in unhappiness with artisnal fisherman

Difficult to realise direct benefits to local communities- proponent acknowledged the need to ensure benefit from revenues generated if resources are found to the local community

Due to high tech nature and low educational and economic base of the affected communities, EIA recommedned local benefits derived from social investment projects (Health, education and sanitation).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What were the intergenerational equity limits?

A

FUTURE

  • applying the precautionary prinicple associated with the threated dugong population and sensitive artisianal fisheries, potential threats were removed
  • allow opportunities of the future generation to see dugongs (and tourism) and to have accessed to sustained food
  • also afford FG the option of exploiting possible hydrocarbon resources as new technology may allows less intrusive exploratory techniques
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What were the partnerships?

A

Mozambican and south african countries companies and EIA involved specialists from both countries
- local experts from Eduardo Mondlane univeristy were contacted, together with South African experts, to undertake dugong research (ie good for capacity building).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was the participation?

A

Stakeholder engagement: a non-technical background information document was distributed to all stakeholders in the scoping phase, aimed at sharing information ahead of public meeting

  • need
  • development description
  • impacts

15 public meetins during implementation phase

  • advertised: local media (radio/ print)
  • simulatenous translaiton used (english and poertugese)
  • published on a website

Stakeholder forum- engagement between stakeholders (NGOS, tourism, fisherires) and EIA team
total of 14 meetings held

17
Q

What was the accountability and transparency?

A

A core success factor to the EIA was the willingness of the proponent to allow the EIA process to address areas of uncertainty without undue pressure on timeframes. Access to information and review of information remained an important component of the process throughout.

During the Scoping phase stakeholders requested technical support in terms of reviewing the Draft Environmental Impact Report. An independent peer reviewer was appointed and all costs associated with this were covered by the proponent. Peer review comments were submitted to the Stakeholder Forum prior to being released to the proponent and the EIA team.

Information was made available at various stages of the process allowing for comment by all stakeholders.

18
Q

What were the strategic issues and cumulative effects?

A

The EIA document addressed the impacts associated with oil and gas exploration activities,
stakeholders raised concern related to the potential long term cumulative impacts associated with oil and gas production, should economically viable gas reserves be found.
The core concerns focused on the perceived incompatibility between the tourism sector, conservation and artisanal fishing and the oil and gas sector.
The oil and gas sector was perceived as a direct threat to
-marine conservation….
-…..as a result a threat to tourism
-and the artisanal fishery.
While the importance of the oil and gas sector to the development of the national economy of Mozambique was recognized, limited local benefits were likely to be realized.

  • In contrast, research showed that the tourism sector was well established in the area, generating significant local benefits
  • The artisanal fishery supported the livelihood of the most vulnerable members of the community.
  • The EIA is not an appropriate tool to address conflicting issues between future oil and gas development and the perceived threats to tourism, artisanal fishing and conservation.
  • Consequently, the EIA team recommended that a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) be undertaken to address these issues and that it be completed prior to the approval of oil and gas production activities in the area.
  • The SEA would assess the costs and benefits of protecting the marine environment and thereby supporting tourism development and artisanal fishing, while promoting the oil and gas sector.

The recommendation to undertake an SEA prior to the approval of oil and gas production activities in the area was supported by the proponent, the government and the affected stakeholders.

19
Q

does it add up?

A

Environmentally- avoids the most sensitive areas and threatened species
Socially- inclusive process involving local stakeholders with external scrutiny
Economically- avoids impacts where livelihoods are supported, compensates for losses; some benefits redistributed

20
Q

Verdict?

A

Blocks 16 and 19 not viable

Sasol group has been extracting natural gas from the pande/ temane deposits in Inhambane since 2004- upper capacity from 120 to 184million