Effect of events Flashcards
Our interest is in the causal effect of finding a
partner. Under which condition could we identify
this causal effect by comparing different persons?
Fundamental problem: we cannot observe change in the same person under the same conditions at two different time points
Between solution:
- statistical twins / need to share all characteristics (unit homogeneity)
- no self-selection (self-select due to omitted/unobserved variable is a problem)
Our interest is in the causal effect of finding a
partner. What is better than between estimation?
What is the within-transformation?
- differencing the data within each individual by subtracting their individual-specific mean or a fixed effect from each observation
- by doing so, the individual-specific time-invariant factors, including the random effects, are differenced out and no longer contribute to the analysis –> random effects assumption becomes irrelevant
- new focus: the time-varying changes within each individual and the factors that drive those changes.
What is the
a) Random-effects assumption
b) Contemporaneous exogeneity assumption
Random-effects assumption: no time-constant unobserved heterogeneity (nothing in the error term that confounds the relationship) –> cancels out in FE estimation as poeple become their own control
Contemporaneous exogeneity assumption: nothing changes over time within person -> no time-varying unobserved heterogeneity
What happens to time-constant factors in within estimations?
“A major motivation for using panel data
has been the ability to control for possibly
correlated, time-invariant heterogeneity
without observing it (Arellano 2004).“
Who needs to be in the treatment group?
The ones that actually experience the event (i.e. finding a partner) - there needs to be variance, i.e. so who is always with partner will not contribute to change bc there is no variance
Interpret the coefficient of par
also: u always want a causal explanation but it is harder to get but only holds if exogeneity assumption applies
Why do we use panel-robust SE in FE estimations?
in panel data, assumption about residuals are not as easily satisfied, especially that residuals have a constant variance and that they not auto-correlated → if we ignore this = underestimate standard errors & regard our estimates as more precise then they truly are
but not as important as getting the effect estimates right (biased effect with correct SE does not get u far)
What is the problem with comparing those two?
Ignores temporal order
How to model time & temporal order
(1) Define the sample: Include only those who can experience the event
(2) Define the event
* Anchor the event in time
* Decide whether to remove or keep reverse and repeated transitions (Keep reverse/repeated transitions if the interest is in finding/having a partner, removeif the interest is in finding/keeping a partner)
(3) Control for unobserved heterogeneity
* Use within-estimation (removes time-constant confounders)
* Use controls for the temporal profile of the outcome (time-varying confounders)
* Use a control sample
Which impact functions are there?
How to control for time-varying heterogeneity?
Control temporal profile (i.e. age, period, anticipation effects)
Why use a control sample?
We could estimate the age profile from the treated
subsample (enough pre- and post-treatment observations)
BUT this is inefficient and can lead to collinearity issues
–> Always keep a control sample
How to model age?
How to model other time-varying heterogeneity?