eerste tentamen Flashcards

1
Q

rationing

A

to limit the beneficial health care an individual desires by any means price or non price, direct or indirect, explicit or implicit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

hard rationing

A

it is not allowed to obtain health care outside the public system for example through own payments, private clinics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

soft rationing

A

it is allowed to obtain health care outside the public system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

why does implicit rationing at the national level sometimes lead to explicit rationing at lower levels?

A

if the explicit choices about whom to treat and whom not are not answered at the higher level, then at the lower levels explicit rationing in some forms become inevitable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

implicit rationing

A

sets limits tot resources but does not indicate how the resources should be allocated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

explicit rationing

A

sets limits to the resources available in combination with choices on how the resources should be allocated.
Making explictly clear who gets what, when and how

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

why is rationing health care inevitable?

A

scarity is core. there are limited resources but unlimited desires, therefore never enough resources to fulfil human wants and needs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

scarcity

A

There are never enough resources to fulfil all human wants and needs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

opportunity costs

A

An important input in making choices.
If you chose one option, you forego another use of resources. The BEST alternative sacrificed are the opportunity costs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

advantages of waiting lists

A
  • reduces need to use other rationing mechanisms
  • waiting time functions as a price, longer waiting indices lower demand
  • in principle the waiting lists are equal to rich and poor
  • unnecessary care is restricted
  • existing waiting times can reduce the flow of referrals
  • waiting lists can help to use available capacity optimally
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

disadvantages waiting times

A
  • loss of quality of life during waiting
  • health state may worsen during waiting time
  • recovery time may increase with waiting time
  • treatment may sometimes be less succesful after waiting times
  • higher medical costs due to worse cases and lower succes rates
  • uncertainty among patients about when they will be treated
  • dissatisfaction in society when waiting times are perceived as too high
  • costs in other economic sectors due to absence of waiting employees
  • higher risk of becoming permantly disabled when waiting keeps you away from work for longer period
  • differences in waiting times between countries way induce cross-border care
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

explain why reducing waiting times is difficult, even when hospital supply is effectively increased

A

If waiting time goes down, price decreases and demand goes up. The demand goes up faster than the waiting times reduces. GP reduce the referrals when waiting times are high.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

explain how the introduction of maximum waiting time guarantees may result in suboptimal outcomes in terms of both the efficiency and equity objectives of a healthcare systems

A

maximum waiting time guarentee leads to the fact that the patient who are almost at the maximum waiting time receive the treatment sooner than beginning patients. When a patient waits longer than the maximum waiting time, there is a fine.

There is now a incentive to avoid people waiting longer than the agreed maximum waiting time. This means people close to the maximum time will prioritized at the expensive of other people who have a higher medical need. The average waiting time for people with a higher medical need goes up. This is not efficient, health is lost due to reprioritization.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

absolute shortfall

A

disease related health loss without treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

proportional shortfall

A

proportion of otherwise lived health lost
absolut shortfall : remaining health expectancy without disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

incremental cost effectiveness ratio

A

difference in cost : difference in qalys

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

tabel voor cost effectiveness

A

proportional shortfall: 0 tot 0,1 -> €0 per qaly

proportional shortfall: 0,11 tot 0,4 ->
€ 20 000 per qaly

proportional shortfall: 0,41 tot 0,7 -> €50 000 per qaly

proportional shortfall: 0,71 tot 1 -> €80 000 per qaly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Dismal science

A

Core assumption: desires are infinite, but resources are limited
- scarcity
- rationing inevitable

19
Q

Market failure due to

A

Uncertainty and consequences of insurance
Information asymmetry
Existence of externalities

20
Q

Why is rationing in health care such an issue?

A
  • Care is a special good
  • Central to human capabilities
  • Strong feeling of solidarity
  • Many countries health care is free
  • Setting limits to access seen as indefensible
21
Q

Why ration?

A

Opportunity costs in outside health care, but also inside health care

22
Q

Inconsistent triad (Weale 1998)

A

The three basic wishes for health care cant be achieved at the same time. The three wishes are comprehensive, high-quality care for all citizens.

23
Q

Four criteria for the basic benefits package (ZiN)

A
  1. Necessity
  2. Effectiveness
  3. Cost-effectiveness
  4. Feasibility
24
Q

Reimbursement model

A

Premium from consumer to insurer.
Reimbursement from insurer to consumer
Provider payment from consumer to provider

25
Contract model
Premium from consumer to insurer provider payment from insurer to provider
26
Supply side rationing
Restricts the supply of care Budget constraints, limiting numbers of doctors or beds
27
Demand side rationing
Restricts the demand of care Limiting the types of health care interventions covered by health insurance
28
Consequences of rationing
Patient: health Social Environment: family effect, informal care Health systems: dissatisfaction Society: inequities
29
What works to reduce waiting times?
- Supply side expansion: Reducing budgetary, rewarding productivity - Demand side reduction: less referrals -Process: maximum waiting time guarantees, improving utilization
30
Dutch waiting times
- Deliberate rationing on care consumption - shortage in personnel
31
Why wasn't the waiting list fund the solution?
Perverse incentives, if you pay hospitals with waiting lists, having waiting lists becomes profitable.
32
Why less waiting after 2000?
- System changes -> productivity rewarded - In return: expenditures increased
33
Explanations for inequity on waiting lists
- Higher SES engage more actively with the system and exercise pressure by long delays - May have better social networks - May have lower probability of missing appointments - May articulate their wishes and needs better
34
Ex ante moral hazard
less prevention and more risk
35
Ex post moral hazard
After, demand more and more expensive care
36
Decision rule
Benefits should be lager than costs
37
incremental cost utility ratio
Incremental costs : qalys
38
value of gained health
total gained qalys x incremental costs
39
severity of illness
Reduce inequalities in terms of current and future health in society. The value of health gains is greater when gained by patients with lower levels of current and future health
40
Fair innings
Everyone is entitled to have a normal life span and therefore the value of health gains is greater when gained by patients who lose a larger share of their lifetime.
41
Equal innings
Those who have not yet had their fair innings, should receive a higher weight
42
Sufficient innings
Those who have had their fair innings, should receive a lower weight.
43
brick wall
Moving from vaccines to vaccination
44
Rule of Rescue
Rescue individuals regardless of cost