EEG Flashcards
Advantages of EEG Monitoring
- Monitoring of depth when unable to access head
- Traditional sites/methods of monitoring eg eye position, m tone unreliable in face of NMBA
- Reflection of hypnotic properties only
Disadvantages of EEG
- Subject to large drug variations
- Conflicting information: arousal pattern or deeper level of ax depending on magnitude of stimulus, level of anesthesia
- No reflection of analgesic properties
- Not more accurate than physical monitoring of depth
General EEG Patterns
o Low‐amplitude, high‐frequency wave pattern during awake state
high‐amplitude
Low‐frequency pattern during ax to burst suppression (intermittent periods of electrical silence)
o Persistent electrical silence with deep levels of anesthesia
EEG Limitations
- Requires vol of recording, specialized training/expertise for interpretation
o EEG voltage (power) changes as function of time (time domain)
o Generation of indices: total EEG power (TOTPOW), median power frequency, burst suppression
o Interpretational algorithms (Fourier transformation): signal activity as function of frequency (frequency domain)
SEF95
spectral edge frequency 95: frequency below which 95% of total EEG power resides
MF
= Median frequency, median EEG power frequency
delta
0.5-3.5Hz
theta
3.5-7.0Hz
alpha
7-13Hz
beta
13-30hz
EEG Frequencies?
Dinner Tonight is Alfredo with Broccoli
delta 0.5-3.5
Theta 3.5-7
Alpha 7-13
Beta 13-30
Bispectral Index
EEG that quantifies degree of ax-induced cortical depression, represents weighted value derived from four subparameters
Burst suppression ratio (time domain)
QUAZI value (time domain)
Beta2 power ratio in 30–47 Hz range vs 11–20 Hz range (frequency domain)
Bispectral biocoherence ratio of peaks in 0.5–47 Hz range vs 40–47 Hz range (frequency domain)
Advantages of BIS
No calibration required, bar graph – signal quality, amt of muscle artifact
Used to help assure that patients are well anesthetized, pain-free, unaware
Disadvantages of BIS
Excessive m movement can interfere with BIS computation
BIS index highly variable in dogs, did not track ETiso well
MAC(BIS)
MAC at which nociceptive stimulus causes increase in BIS to 60 (cats)
BIS: Effect of different anesthetics
Strong depression: propofol, midaz, TP
Intermediate effect: inhalants
Little effect: opioids
Increase BIS: ketamine, N2O
BIS Measurements
- Quantitative, 0-100
BIS >90
compatible with awake, alert
BIS 80-90
anxiolysis
BIS 60-80
with moderate obtundation
* 60-70: compatible with completion of sx in dogs
BIS <60
Loss of recall
BIS <50
Unresponsive to verbal stimuli
BIS <40
loss of muscular movement in response to a noxious stimulus
BIS <20
burst suppression (deep anesthesia)
BIS 0
isoelectric activity
Cerebral state index (CSI) using a cerebral state monitor (CSM)
o 3 clip electrodes: forehead (+), occipital (-), parietal (reference)
o Index calculated via algorithm of two energy bands (beta, and alpha), B:A ratio, burst suppression (BS)
BS: quotient that considers time to zero EEG activity
EEG, CSI, BS, EMG, signal quality index (SQI)
CSI >90
Awake
CSI 80-90
sedation
CSI <80
Unconscious
Anything lower not correlated well with physical signs of depth
Narcotrend
Auditory evoked EEG responses used primarily to assess neurologic function, CNS disease
Also used to assess depth and awareness/recall
Analyzes raw EEG data, categorizes level of sedation:
Narcotrend: A0
Awake