eco developments 1851-86 - 'workshop of the world' Flashcards
growth of Coal in tons 1856 - 1870
65M tons - 110M tons
growth of Iron in tons 1850 - 1875
2M tons - 6M tons
growth of Steel in tons 1850 - 1875
60,000 tons - 2M tons
how much was industrial growth in 1950s
3.5% per year
how much did trade grow in exports and imports between 1850-1875
20%-25%
social stats during boom
living standards increased
unemployment fell
wages increases quicker than prices
impacts on public as a result of boom
wealth increased
consumption increased which fulled the boom
what happened in agriculture due to the boom
agricultural labours fell by almost half a million 1851-71 simultaneously to increase in key industries
how much did the British population grow by
6 million in 20 years
what was the difference between Britain and foreign competitors at this time?
Britain had been fairly unaffected by war
which choice made to Britains economy helped feed the boom?
free trade and laissez-faire economics
what did the limited liabilities act 1855-62 encourage
- firms and individuals were encouraged to show initiative and enterprise
- buying of shares in firms as the level of risk was limited to the value of the investment
evidence that Britain wasn’t the workshop of the world
- Britain were importing goods of higher total value than it was exporting
- the balance of commodity trade was providing positive feedback
1846-50 stats on balance of commodity trade
£88M net imports
£61M exports of UK
balance of commodity £-27M
1851-55 stats on balance of commodity trade
£116M net imports
£89M exports
BofCt £-28M
1871-75 stats on balance of commodity trade
£302M net imports
£240M UK exports
£-63M balance of commodity trade
what is the increase decline of balance of commodity trade 1851-1875
1851 = £-28M 1875 = £-63M
which industries made balance of trade positive
incomes of services: shipping, insurance and banking - invisible trade
incomes from interest and dividends from investments abroad
what was the main reason for workshop of the world to be inappropriate title
Britains lack of ability to compete with foreign competition
foreign competition within the economy
- larger populations and greater resources of materials
- outperformed Britain in education
- more investment in technologies
- despite Britains industrialising earlier Germany and USA started with the latest technology
- Britain industry made up of smaller firms than in Germany and USA = less likely to have the capital available to invest in new machinery
how were USA and Germany outperforming Britain in education
- male illiteracy was 17% in Britain VS 2% in Germany 1875
- British universities produced fewer scientists and engineers than USA
- from 1850 German Realschule pioneered technically focused secondary education opposed to classical British syllabus
technology differences between Britain and USA & Germany
- US’s mass production of guns, clocks and sewing machines
- Germany and USA industries were being started up with newest technology, British industries now had outdated machinery and techniques
- 1873 production increased but prices and profits fell in B