Early Phase of Climate Change Regime Flashcards

1
Q

Climate Change Regime Up to 2000

A

1990: IPCC First Assessment Report -> unprecedented warming -> major impetus

1992 - UNFCCC concluded + signed

1994 UNFCCC goes into force

1995 - IPCC Second Assessment Report - humans are changing the climate

1995 Berlin Mandate sets framework for negotiating developed country targets

1997 Kyoto Protocol

2000 IPCC Third Assessment - human effect on the environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

UNFCCC - Article 1

A
  • contains definitions
  • “‘Climate change’ means a change of climate which is attributed directly or indirectly to human activity that alters the composition of the global atmosphere and which is in addition to natural climate variability observed over comparable time periods.”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

UNFCCC - Article 2 - Text

A

Core Objective

“The ultimate objective…is to achieve… stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system. Such a level should be achieved within a time frame sufficient to allow ecosystems to adapt naturally to climate change, to ensure that food production is not threatened and to enable economic development to proceed in a sustainable manner.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

UNFCCC - Article 2 - Significance

A
  • sets up conditions for parties to have to figure out what the level is that would prevent “dangerous anthropogenic interference”
  • shapes activity going forward
  • standard by which parties’ current + future commitments under the climate regime are measured
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

UNFCCC - Article 3

A
  • sets out principles to guide the parties
  • somewhat self-aware that this is a framework convention (history of ozone regime - possibility of success even with a less firm start)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

UNFCC Article 3 - Principle 1

A
  • consistent with many principles from the Rio Declaration (future generations, common but differentiated responsibilities)
  • clear articulation of focus

“The Parties should protect the climate system for the benefit of present and future generations of humankind, on the basis of equity and in accordance with their common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities. Accordingly, the developed country Parties should take the lead in combating climate change and the adverse effects thereof.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

UNFCCC Article 3 - Principle 2

A
  • concept of needing to particularly consider the needs of those especially vulnerable to climate change/those who will bear disproportionate burdens

“The specific needs and special circumstances of developing country Parties, especially those that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change, and of those Parties, especially developing country Parties, that would have to bear a disproportionate or abnormal burden under the Convention, should be given full consideration.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

UNFCCC Article 3 - Principle 3

A
  • precautionary principle - largely drawing on Rio language, but with additional principles to guide it

“The Parties should take precautionary measures to anticipate, prevent or minimize the causes of climate change and mitigate its adverse effects. Where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainty should not be used as a reason for postponing such measures, taking into account that policies and measures to deal with climate change should be cost-effective so as to ensure global benefits at the lowest possible cost. To achieve this, such policies and measures should take into account different socio-economic contexts, be comprehensive, cover all relevant sources, sinks and reservoirs of greenhouse gases and adaptation, and comprise all economic sectors.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

UNFCCC - Article 4 - Overall

A
  • theoretically sets out commitments, but not all that formal or strict
  • importance of bringing everyone to the table
    -> even treaties w/ barely any commitments are still treaties, still setting up institutional mechanisms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

UNFCCC - Article 4(1)

A
  • applies to all parties, but with concept of differentiated responsibilities: “All parties, taking into account their common but differentiated responsibilities and their specific national and regional development priorities, objectives and circumstances, shall…”
  • no fixed targets, no specific goals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

UNFCCC - Article 4(2)

A
  • applies only to “developed countries” + parties included in Annex I
  • “Each of these Parties shall adopt national policies and take corresponding measures on the mitigation of climate change, by limiting its anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases and protecting and enhancing its greenhouse gas sinks and reservoirs”
  • “each of these Parties shall communicate” periodically “detailed information on its policies and measures…with the aim of returning individually or jointly to their 1990 levels of these anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide”
    -> possibility that this was intended as a soft target + timetable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

UNFCCC - Article 4(3)

A
  • discussion of providing financial resources to developing countries
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Other Provisions of UNFCCC

A
  • sets up Conferences of the Parties
  • explicitly says can have NGO observers
  • Article 9 sets up subsidiary body for scientific + tech advice
  • Article 10 subsidiary body for information
  • Article 11 - important provision for financial mechanism
  • Article 12 - parties should communicate a national inventory of anthropogenic emissions by source, general description of steps taken, + any other info parties consider relevant (possibly designed as a way to get Parties to really think about their emissions moving forward)
  • no mention of liability anywhere
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Kyoto Protocol - Core Elements of Agreement

A
  • CAP: Annex I countries must reduce by 5% below 1990 levels of GHG emissions (Article 3)
    -> this was within the aggregate - the EU used a bubble approach + wound up w/ different targets
  • NO CAP for non-Annex I countries
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Kyoto Protocol - Mechanisms

A
  • Joint Implementation - within Annex I countries
  • Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) - between Annex I and non-Annex I countries
  • REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degredation)
  • Emissions trading scheme
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Kyoto Protocol - Article 17

A
  • Emissions Trading

“The Conference of the Parties shall define the relevant principles, modalities, rules and guidelines, in particular for verification, reporting and accountability for emissions trading. The Parties included in Annex B may participate in emissions trading for the purposes of fulfilling their commitments under Article 3. Any such trading shall be supplemental to domestic actions for the purpose of meeting quantified emission limitation and reduction commitments under that Article.”

17
Q

Kyoto Protocol - Article 6

A
  • Joint Implementation

“For the purpose of meeting its commitments under Article 3, any Party included in Annex I may transfer to, or acquire from, any other such Party emission reduction units resulting from projects aimed at reducing anthropogenic emissions by sources or enhancing anthropogenic removals by sinks of greenhouse gases in any sector of the economy, provided that:
(a) Any such project has the approval of the Parties involved;
(b) Any such project provides a reduction in emissions by sources, or an enhancement of removals by sinks, that is additional to any that would otherwise occur;
(c) It does not acquire any emission reduction units if it is not in compliance with its obligations under Articles 5 and 7; and
(d) The acquisition of emission reduction units shall be supplemental to domestic actions for the purposes of meeting commitments under Article 3.”

18
Q

Kyoto Protocol - Article 12

A
  • Clean Development Mechanism

“2. The purpose of the clean development mechanism shall be to assist Parties not included in Annex I in achieving sustainable development and in contributing to the ultimate objective of the Convention, and to assist Parties included in Annex I in achieving compliance with their quantified emission limitation and reduction commitments under Article 3.”

“3. Under the clean development mechanism:
(a) Parties not included in Annex I will benefit from project activities resulting in certified emission reductions; and
(b) Parties included in Annex I may use the certified emission reductions accruing from such project activities to contribute to compliance with part of their quantified emission limitation and reduction commitments under Article 3, as determined by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this Protocol.”

19
Q

What do you need to make offsets work?

A
  • additionality
  • managing leakage
  • permanence (need to make sure offsets are sustained over time)
  • fungibility
20
Q

Kyoto Protocol - Joint Implementation

A
  • Article 7
  • In its general form, it’s a way of meeting your obligations by investing in a project in another country that will reduce emissions or serve as a sink for emissions (meet your own obligations by investing in someone else doing something)
  • uses the word “additional” -> designed to avoid double-counting – if it was going to happen anyway + country was just looking for people to finance it, it’s not additional
21
Q

Concerns Regarding Offsets

A
  • assumption of fungibility not always correct
    -> corresponding geographical risks (might wind up with concentrated pollution)
    -> ex of hydroelectric dam w/ huge implications for local population + biodiversity
  • risk of missing other env impacts (land use, biodiversity)
  • not really tech-forcing (might wind up just getting low-hanging fruit)
  • quantifying emissions difficult
  • difficulty of defining the cap
  • allowing offsets risks engraining behavior you’re trying to get rid of
  • political complexity - can’t freeze countries in a moment in time
  • perverse incentives - could inadvertently increase value of high-emitting old facilities
22
Q

What institutional aspects are required for offsets to work?

A

MONITORING, VERIFICATION, + INFORMATION