E. God’s Way of Salvation (WCF 7-9; WLC 20, 30–56; WSC 12, 20–28) Flashcards
What is a covenant?
- a binding agreement between two parties with promises and obligations
- “A covenant is a pact or agreement between two parties. It may be, and among men most generally is, an agreement [between equal parties]; but it may also be [imposed by a superior upon an inferior]. It is generally confirmed by a solemn ceremony as in the presence of God, and thereby obtains an inviolable character. Each one of the parties binds himself to the fulfilment of certain promises on the basis of stipulated conditions.” (Berhoff)
What is the Covenant of Works (Life)? Who are its parties?
• Between God and Adam/Eve in the Garden. If Adam obeyed he would have life. He was not to eat of the forbidden fruit.
Is there a present validity to the Covenant of Works (Life)? What is it?
• Yes, in some senses it is still in force
o If we could obey we perfectly God’s law it would lead to life
o The punishment for this covenant is still in effect: death
• In other senses no, it is not in effect
o We no longer face the specific command (to not eat)
o Since we have a sinful nature, we cannot fulfill the provisions
o Christ has kept it, and through faith in Him we gain the benefits of it
What is the Covenant of Redemption? Who are its parties?
• “It is an agreement among the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, in which the Son agreed to become a man, be our representative, obey the demands of the covenant of works on our behalf, and pay the penalty for sin, which we deserved” (Grudem, 518)
• Among the members of the Trinity
- (John 10 - this was Jesus’ mission: to lay down his life)
Discuss the Covenant of Grace.
Covenant of Grace: God's free promise of grace where salvation is promised through Christ by faith • Adam/Eve (Genesis 3:15, 21) • Noah (Genesis 9:8-17) • Abraham (Genesis 15:1-21; 17:1-27) • Moses (Exodus 19-24, especially 24) • David (2 Samuel 7:5-16) • New Covenant (Jeremiah 33:19-22)
How is the Covenant of Grace related to the Abrahamic, Mosaic, and Noahic Covenants?
They are all under the covenant of grace, but are different administrations
- Abrahamic: Promises to be received by faith (Family)
- Mosaic: A guardian to curb sin, convict sinners, and guide God’s people (National)
- Noahic: A covenant providing common grace, giving time for the full promises of God to be fulfilled in Christ
Discuss the relationship between the Old and New Covenants. Defend from Scripture.
One covenant of grace in two dispensations or administrations.
The Old Covenant was administered by promises, prophecies, sacrifices, circumcision, the paschal lamb, and other types and ordinances.
The New covenant is dispensed are the preaching of the Word, and the administration of the sacraments of baptism and the Lord’s Supper: which, though fewer in number, and administered with more simplicity, and less outward glory, yet, in them, it is held forth in more fullness, evidence and spiritual efficacy, to all nations
The Old Covenant was a guardian (Gal. 3)
Explain and define (with Scripture proofs) the orthodox doctrine of the person of Christ.
- One Person, fully God and fully man (John 1 - Divinity, 1 Tim 2 - Humanity: the man Jesus Christ, Heb 4 - tempted as we were)
• (A21) Jesus, being the eternal Son of God, became man (John 1:14), and so was, and continues to be, God and man in two distinct natures and one person (Romans 9:5), forever (Hebrews 7:24)
Briefly discuss the natures of Christ, including….
~ Was Christ a human person?
~ Does Christ have a soul?
~ What is kenosis?
~ Did Christ lay aside any of His divine attributes at the incarnation?
~ Jesus became man (John 1 - God tabernacled among us)
~ Jesus took on a human body and a reasonable soul (Matt 26 - my soul is sorrowful)
~ Kenosis: The Greek term for “emptying” (Phil 2)
~ No, God cannot stop being God and still be God; His human nature was fully human, and his divine nature always and everywhere was fully divine; Jesus emptied Himself not of His deity nor His divine attributes, but His prerogative (His glory and His privileges)(Colossians 2:9 - the fullness of deity)
Docetism
- End of 1st Century
- Jesus: Divine, but not human
- Taught by Basilides, Valentinus, Patripassians, Sabellians,
- Heresy: A view that says, “Christ only seemed to become a man.”
- Refuted by Irenaeus, 1 John 4:1-3
- Reply: If Christ were not fully human He could not redeem humanity (Heb. 2:14; 1 John 4:1-3)
- Jesus laid this view aside even in His resurrection by inviting Thomas to touch His wounds (John 20:24ff.).
Arius
- 4th Century
- Jesus is human, but not divine
- Arius, presbyter of Alexandria; Origen
- Heresy: Homoiousios: Jesus has appearance of God, is of similar substance. He is the first and highest created being.
- Refuted by Athanasius; Nicaea 325
- Reply: Athanasius: Jesus homoousios –one substance with God; Only a divine Christ can save (Phil. 2:6; Rev. 1:
Nestorius
- 5th Century
- Jesus is human and divine
- Nestorius, bishop of Constantinople
- Heresy: 1 moral being
2 people
schizophrenic - Refuted by Cyril of Alexandria; Ephesus 431
- Reply: 2 natures in 1 person
Indivisible
Apollinarius
- 4th Century
- Jesus is divine, but not human
- Apollinarius, bishop of Laodicea; Justin Martyr
- Heresy: Human body, Divine mind/soul; the divine Logos took the place of the human mind. Opposed use of theotokos. Only human nature died.
- Refuted by Vitalis; Damascus; Basil; Theodosius; Gregory of Nazianzus; Gregory of Nyssa; Constantinople 381
- Reply: Human mind & divine mind in human
Eutyches
- 5th Century
- Jesus is neither human or divine
- Eutychians; Theodosius II
- Heresy: 1 mixed nature after incarnation
New Hybrid: neither human or divine - Refuted by Flavian of Constantinople; Pope Leo; Theodoret; Eusebius of Dorylaeum; Chalcedon 451
- Reply: 2 natures: communication between them
Are any of the early heresies regarding the natures of Christ held today? If so, by whom?
• JW- Jesus is not divine
• Mormons- Latter-day Saints believe that Jesus was Jehovah himself, God of Israel, not son of Jehovah
- Coptics - monophysite
Explain and defend the doctrine of the “communication of properties.”
Human and Divine (John 1)
- This means that the one person of Jesus can exhibit attributes of divinity (omnipresence, all knowing, etc.) and at the same time exhibit attributes of humanity (eating, walking, learning, growing, etc.). The communicatio idiomatum does not mean, however, that anything particular to the divine nature was communicated to the human nature. Likewise, it does not mean that anything particular to the human nature was communicated to the divine nature.