E&F - lecture 5 Flashcards
What is a financial incentive?
- A stimulus that motivated an individual or organization to perform a specific action
- When it takes the form of a material reward (e.g., money) it is called a financial incentive
What is a provider payment system?
the way in which money is allocated to providers by payers
Relevance of payment incentives
- Financial incentives are always present, in any sector of the economy; everyone must be paid for their work
- Providers respond to financial incentives and can influence demand because of their information surplus
- Providers don’t always act as perfect agents for their patients
Blended payment
- All payment methods have important disadvantages, especially when applied in isolation
- Makes sense to combine methods with opposing incentives
- Theory: blended payment will outperform methods in their pure form
Agency theory
Provider payment entails a form of incentive contract between payer and provider. Hence, analysis is thereof falls within larger economic literature on incentive contracting, called agency theory
- Information asymmetry problematic of interests conflict, giving the agent incentives to exploit his information surplus, which may result in agency problems
The physician’s utility function
- Standard theory of provider behavior: profit maximization or a favorable combination of income and leisure
- This seems not fully applicable to physicians, e.g. because they do not exploit all possibilities to induce demand
- Possible explanations:
o Physicians pursue a target income
o Physicians’ professional ethics
–> McGuire and Pauly’s
–> Rizzo and Zeckhauser’s
Prospect theory:
people have a strong aversion. To losing relative to a subjectively determined reference/ target income
* Below TI: high marginal utility of income
* Above TI: low marginal utility of income
Multitasking problem
- The design of payment incentives considerably complicated by the multitasking problem
“Challenge of designing incentives to motivate appropriate effort across multiple tasks when the desired outcomes for some tasks are more difficult to measure than others.”
Base payment
- Due to multitasking problem, provider payment must at least consist of a base part not directly linked to measured performance
- There are many different ways to structure this base payment
o Per: service, episode, condition, person, period, …
o Each method has its own pros and cons - On top of the base, performance-related payments can be measured (?)
Base payment vs. pay-for-performance
Base payment
* Always present
* Not directly related to measured performance
* Vast majority of revenues
* Various methods possible
Pay-for-performance
* Optional add-on
* Directly related to measured performance
* Typically small fraction of revenues
* Many design options
o insurance/ probability risk
= beyond the control of the provider, therefore, should be held by the payer or insurer you cannot predict if someone is sick or not or getting an accident or not. If something cannot be influenced, it is insurance (like air pollution)
o performance/ technical risk
utilization and costs that are under the providers’ control, this risk should be held by the provider prevention or efficient care
payer can influence ‘location’ of the risk via the payment system:
- risk bearing: payer bears full risk, the provider has no incentive to act cost consciously if there are no financial consequences of their actions
- risk shifting: provider bear full risk, not desired
- risk splitting: provider bears performance risk, payer bears insurance risk. This is unlikely to be feasible in practice.
- risk sharing: provider and payer bear both risks together. Is feasible in practice
Base payment methods and financial risk
à Variable, retrospective system: payer bears full risk, because provider is reimbursed for the actual input costs, no risk for the provider at all. Variations in activities induces changes in payment.
à Fixed, prospective system: provider bears full risk, because there is no link with the actual number of activities performed and also no link with the actual costs. The reimburse amount does not change as activities increase or decrease.
Jegers et al. also make a distinction based on unit of payment:
o Per service (fee-for-service) or day
o Per episode or condition (episode-based or bundled payment)
o Per enrolled person (capitation payment)
o Per period (salary/ budget)