DS5101 - Fixed-fixed conventional bridge Flashcards

1
Q

Aims and Objectives

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Sequence of treatment plan

A
  1. clinical exam, identification of patient’s needs
  2. special investigations, wax ups, mounted casts, radiographs
  3. correction of existing disease and stabilisation of conditions
  4. prevention of future disease - OHI, F
  5. evaluate outcome of preventative phase
  6. restore function, improve appearance
  7. review and maintenance, reinforce OHI and prevention
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What to investigate regarding abutments

A

Radiographic, pulp, dental hard/soft tissue, occlusal evaluation
- structurally sound
- abutment abutments in alignment/position
- previous restorations/RCT satisfactory (not recommended for abutment)
- abutment root and supporting alveolar bone are functionally adequate
- adequate alveolar bone of edentulous ridge in quality and quantity
- adequate soft tissue of edentulous ridge in quantity and quality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What do you need to communicate with the patient when tx planning

A
  • current conditions and management of any ongoing problems
  • extent of intervention and logical sequence of proposed treatment
  • time and cost
  • level of home care required for favourable long-term outcomes
  • level and cost of maintenance/repairs/replacements
  • possible alterations before any irreversible procedures are undertaken
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Considerations during history and examination

A
  • patient factors: OH, parafunctional habits, past dental history
  • mouth condition, extent of problem
  • restorative status of tooth/teeth in question
  • availability of interocclusal space and occlusion
  • possible technical and clinical challenges
  • patient wishes and expectations
  • feasibility and prognosis of treatment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Advantages/disadvantages of fixed-fixed bridges

A

Advantages
- alternative to implant when bone quanity/quality suboptimal
- predictable/aesthetic results with good planning/patient selection
- allow stresses to be distributed more evenly
- various designs can be used in different parts of arch
- can be used in anterior/posterior long spans/periodontal splinting

Disadvantages
- destructive of tooth structure, can cause endodontic issues in abutments
- needs meticulous planning and design of bridge framework and occlusal features
- pulpal death common in abutments
- after RCT, remake normally needed
- costly and requries excellent OH and maintenance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Advantages/disadvantages of hybrid bridges

A

Advantages
- fixed solution for edentulous space
- no/minimal prep on one abutment
- good for transitional phase to keep the space and avoid loss of interocclusal space
- can be bonded adhesively
- good patient satisfaction

Disadvantages
- high probability of debonding of metal retainer
- can lead to caries under debonded retainer
- technique sensitive/requires excellent planning and moisture control
- needs regular check-ups to evaluate the retainers and their bond
- not enough clinical evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Advantages/disadvantages of cantilevered bridges

A

Advantages
- good aesthetic can be achieved
- more conservative and less complications due to simpler desig
- lesser chance of developing caries under retainer
- good option for single tooth replacement
- mostly non-castostrophic failure

Disadvantages
- risk of debonding and failure
- especially on RCT teeth
- metal base can make tooth look darker
- pulpal death of abutment possible
- not ideal for load bearing area

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Advantages/disdavantages of fixed-movable bridges

A

Advantages
- allows for flexure of the bridge, reduced load on weaker retainer
- allows for partial coverage of retainers and less prep required
- compensates for abutment malalignment
- allows individual movement of sections during function
- units should eb cemented as individual sections in right order

Disadvantages
- destruction of tooth structure as room for dove-tail joint needs to be created
- metal may show on the site of moveable joint
- wear and mechanical failure of joint can happen
- try in and cementation can be challenigng
- technically challenging for technician and requires framework try-in

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is an intracoronal precision attachment? And the 2 types

A
  • Dove tail attachments are incorporated entirely within the contour of the crown
  • female component in crown and male in prosthesis
  1. prefabricated by manufacturer - usually made of precious metal
  2. plastic attachments (castable) - simple, precise and indicated for fixed bridges - CUSTOM MADE, better
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Advantages and disadvantages of intracoronal attachment (3,3)

A

Advantages:
- reduced stress on abutment compared to conventional
- all stress is directed along the long axis of the tooth
- allows for individual movement of abutment teeth

Disadvantages:
- extra prep to create room for dove tail joint
- attachment is subject to wear as a result of friction between metal parts
- lack of RCTs and high quality data from SRs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Types of stress on fixed bridge (3)

A

Tensile stress: internal induced force that opposes elongation of a material parallel to direction of the stress, it is generated when structures are flexed, like deformation of a bridge

Compressive stress: internal induced that opposes shortening of material parallel to the direction of the stress, associated with compressive strain

Shearing stress: internal induced force that opposes the sliding of one plane of material on adjacent plane in direction parallel to the stress - tends to resist sliding or twisting of one portion over another. Can be produced by twisting action on a material e.g. force applied along surface of enamel-RBB retainer interface by sharp-edged tooth - the RBB. may debond by shear stress failure of resin luting agent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Things to consider in framework design

A
  • dental porcelain is weak in tension/shear but strong in compression
  • design should avoid/minimise tensile and shear stresses
    -> especially at framework-porcelain interface/within the porcelain veneer
  • weakest part in posterior bridges is the fixed joint due to high concentration of tensile and shear stresses
  • increased depth of connector increases its strength (atleast 2.5mm occluso-gingivally and bucco-lingually)
  • doubling depth from 1.5mm to 3mm increases strength by a factor of 8
  • doubling width of a connector doubles the strength
  • doubling length of span allows 8x as much deflection for a given force (but more biological failure)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

PFM vs Layered Zirconia

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is a Pier abutment?

A
  • ## tooth in the middle of a bridge span
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Disadvantage of Pier abutment design

A

Used in long span bridges around the dental arch
> functional/physiological tooth movements vary across dental arch
(due to shape of arch, movements are in different directions - anteriors tend to move labially, posteriors tilt mesialy)
> unfavourable forces put constant stress on restoration and luting material
> in a fixed bridge, the abutment fails at weakest interface
> leads to leakage/development of caries

17
Q

In which case may Pier abutments/long span bridges be okay, as opposed to in sound teeth

A

in perio compromised teeth w some degree of mobility - long span splinting effect may be beneficial

but in sound abutments, will often lead to loss of restorative seal

18
Q

Whats wrong with this

A

double abutments

  • uneven distibution of stress
  • fracture of cement lute of the weakest retainer
  • leads to leakage/caries/debonding of bridge
19
Q

General design considerations

A
  • periodontal support
  • occlusal loading (magnitude and direction of force)
  • conservation of tooth tissue
  • cleansability
  • appearance
  • rigidity
  • no. of abutments
  • choice of luting cement
20
Q

Tooth Preparation - General Principles for fixed bridge

A
  • diagnostic wax-up for all bridgework
  • conservative prep with putty index from the final form
  • abutments parallel to eachother
  • maximum resistance/retention form
  • supragingival finish line
  • need to modify/replace old restos for better bonding
  • IDS on freshly prepared abutments for better bonding
21
Q

What is a malpositioned abutment. How does it differ from M and D?

A
  • when abutment is tilted (might be due to adjacent exo), occlusal surfaces are non-parallel to occlusal table - may not need to reduce occlusal surface to achieve clearance
    Image 1: tipping of distal abutment brings a change in the O plane as mesial cusps of distal abutment have no antagonistic contact and require less occlusal reduction to achieve the clearance
22
Q

Implication of malposition abutment for bridge. Give solution. Whats the most conservative option? (3)

A

teeth deviated from normal long axis - no common path of insertion

can be managed by recontouring, orthodontics, 3/4 crowns or telescopic crowns
-> 3/4 crowns on tilted abutment plus a hybrid/fixed-moveable design are the most conservative option

23
Q

Bridges in patients with advanced perio (Lindhe study)

A
  • severe reduction of perio support doesnt influence perio status during observation period
  • loss of retention occured in abutments w partial crowns - reduced resistance to deformation
  • need maximum length and minimal taper prep and parallelism between abutments is imperative
  • fracture of abutment occured more frequently in RCT fitted w posts and serving as terminal abutments for free-end segments
24
Q

Occlusal considerations

A
  • share load equally between abutments and pontics
  • first achieve desired occlusal contacts on provisional
  • avoid loading pontic in lateral and protrusive movements
  • light contact in ICP on pontics
  • proper planning using mounted study casts and well-fitted temporary will help achieve desired occlusion
  • consider group function to avoid exceesive load on canine
25
Q

Pontic design considerations (3) What 2 things do you want?

A
  1. Ease of cleaning: the lesser the soft tissue-pontic contact, the better the OH maintenance
  2. Abutment height: tall abutment teeth allow for desired connector dimensions
  3. Aesthetics: position of tooth is primary determinant of choice for pontic design
  • Pressure-free/passive contact between pontic and soft tissues
  • Passive contact should only be to attached gingiva, otherwise ulcerations tend to develop due to friction
26
Q

What is shown

A

chronic gingival inflammation due to food lodgement beneath the pontic

27
Q

Types of pontic design (4)

A
  1. ridge lap
  2. modified ridge lap
  3. sanitary
  4. ovate
28
Q

What is Ridge Lap Pontic (aka saddle). (2) Advantages (2) & Disadvantages (4)

A
  • concave fitting surface, overlaps ridge bucco-lingually
  • simulates contour/emergence profile of missing tooth on both sides of the residual ridge

Advantages
- highly aesthetic
- good patient adaptibility as feels similar to original tooth

Disadvantages
- extremely difficult to remove excess cement from under pontic
- most difficult for pt to clean and maintain
- high possibility of inflammation at pontic-soft tissue contact areas
- high possibility of food impingement under pontic
-> gingival recession can occur after gingival inflammation

29
Q

What is Modified ridge lap. Advantages & Disadvantages

A
  • evolved ridge lap
  • reduced area of soft tissue contact
  • covers buccal side of ridge for emergence profile but no contact on most of lingual to faciliate OH

Advantages
- good aesthetics
- relatively easy to remove excess cement from under
- pt can maintain OH
- can replace any tooth regardless of position

Disadvantages
- undersurface pontic requires pt tongue adaptation as it is partially hollowed out
- design may cause air/saliva percolating through embrasures especially in anterior whiel speaking
- in excessive ridge loss, pontic may be unusually long

30
Q

What is Sanitary pontic (aka hygienic). Advantages & disadvantages

A
  • complete absence of contact between pontic and underlying soft tissue for easy cleaning, minimum 2mm gap

Advantages
- self cleansing: ideal from OH stand point
- easy to remove excess cement

Disadvntages
- requires initial adaptation by tongue as completely hollowed out
(patient needs to accustom to design during provisional, if comfortable, can be replicated in definitive)
- lacks aesthetics, only for posteriors

31
Q

What is Ovate pontic? Advantages & disadvantages

A
  • convex tissue surface, resides in soft tissue depressin of residual ridge creating illusion as if pontic is emerging from gingiva
  • in immediate exo: socket needs to be preserved w provisional prosthesis designed with an ovate pontic bed
  • in pre-existing ridge: soft tissue may require augmentation then provisional

Advantages
- most aesthetic
- can be maintained by pt using correct flossing technique
- ideal in aesthetic zone, pt w high lip line

Disadvantages
- additional effort to mould soft tissue
- multiple appointments

32
Q

Choice of pontic according to position

A

mx anterior - ovate
mx posterior - modified ridge lap
md anterior - ovate
md posterior - sanitary

(alternatives= modified ridge lap)

33
Q

Summary

A
  • secondary caries higher in densely sintered zirconia compared to PFM bridges
  • incidence of ceramic fractures and loss of retention signficantly higher for densely sintered zirconia