Discretion Flashcards
s 90 Evidence Act?
Discretion to exclude admissions.
In a criminal proceedings, the court MAY refuse to admit evidence of an admission, or refuse to admit the evidence to prove a particular fact, if:
(a) the evidence is adduced by the prosecution, and
(b) having regard to the circumstances in which the admission was made, it WOULD (not might) be unfair to a defendant to use the evidence.
What does the MAY mean in the legislation?
The MAY is the discretion.
S90
Onus, test, focus, standard?
Onus - Defence
Test - Based on how it was made it is unfair to use.
Focus - Circumstances under how it was made.
Standard - Balance
S135 Evidence Act?
The court MAY refuse to admit evidence if it’s probitive value is substantially outweighed by the danger that the evidence MIGHT:
a) Be unfairly prejudicial to a party, or
b) Be misleading or confusing, or
c) Cause or result in undue waste of time.
What’s probative value?
The extent to which it’s relevant.
s135.
Onus, test, focus, standard?
Onus - party objecting
Test - Balancing act between probative value and prejudiced effect.
Focus - Time of hearing
Standard - Balance
Unfair prejudice and case?
R v Bauer 2018
Harm to the interests of the accused by reason of a risk that evidence will be used improperly in some unfair way.
Case on what is not unfair prejudice?
Festa v R 2001
Evidence is not prejudicial merely because it strengthens the prosecution case.
s 136?
REMEDY
The court MAY limit the use to be made of evidence if there is a danger that a particular use of the evidence MIGHT:
a) Be unfairly prejudicial to a party
b) Be misleading or confusing.
S137?
In a criminal proceeding, the court MUST refuse to admit evidence adduced by the prosecutor if it’s probitive value is outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice to the defendant.
S 137 Onus, test, focus, standard?
Onus - Defence
Test - Does probative value outweigh danger of unfair prejudice
Focus - Evidence at court
Standard - balance
S 138 (1)?
Improperly or illegally obtained.
1) Evidence that was obtained:
a) Improperly or in contravention of an Australian law, or
b) In cosequence of an impropriety or of a contravention of an Australian law,
Is not to be admitted unless the desirability of admitting the evidence outwieghs the undesirability of admitting the evidence that has been obtained in the way in which the evidence was obtained.
S 138 Onus, test, focus, standard
Onus - Party asserting
TEst - 1. Illegally, improperly obtained.
2. The desirability of admitting the evidence outweighs the desirability of excluding it.
Focus - How the evidence was obtained.
Standard - Balance.
S 138 (3)?a-h PINGDCPD
Without limiting the matters the court may take into account under sub section (1), it is to take into account:
a) Probative value of the evidence, and
b) The importance of the evidence in the proceeding, and
c) Nature of the relevant offence, cause of action or defence and nature of subject matter of proceeding
d) Gravity of the impropriety of contravention
e) Whether the impropriety or contravention was deliberate or rekless.
f) Whether the impropriety or contravention was contrary to or inconsistent with a right of a person recognised by the international convent on civil and political rights, and
g) Whether any proceeding (whether or not in court) has been or is likely to be taken in relation to the impropriety or contravention, and
h) The difficulty (if any) of obtaining the evidence without impropriety or contravention of an Australian law.
Standard of proof and section?
Balance, S142 Evidence Act.