Disability, Ableism, Accessibility, and Inclusion Flashcards
moral model of disability
disability = sin, loss/test of faith, reinforces shame and idea of disabilty as punishment in our culture
medical model of disability
disability as an individual problem due to a defect or failure of one’s body categorized by diagnosis, reducing QoL, ameliorated using medical treatment and rehabilitation, people who do not share this view are labelled as nonadherent or unmotivated; legislation is usually exclusively from medical perspective
propositions of the medical model for individual
- focuses on the limitations and ways to prevent/reduce/improve limitations for better body functioning thus increasing functionality in society
- uses adaptive knowledge and tech to support people with medical conditions to live a more normal life (better ADL function)
propositions of the medical model for society
- medical and technological advances gen faith in scientific and professional interventions
- justifies investing resources in health care services, procedures, tech, and research to prevent/reduce medical conditions
dangers of the medical model
- paternalism values expertise, creating services for not with people with medical conditions, unintended social devaluing of people with medical conditions
- charitable portrayal of people with medical conditions casts them in a negative perspective and disempowers them
- may harm the self-esteem and social inclusion of people with medical conditions, leading to internalized disability and personal tragedy discourse
- resources could have been directed toward removing environmental barriers in disability such as universal design for social change on larger scale
- disabled people are seen as inspirational porn; objectified to inspire non-disabled people
health professionals’ views on disability
in line with general public and often are more negative than disabled people’s views possibly influencing patient response to treatment and self-acceptance, and contributing to health inequalities between disabled and non-disabled people
social model of disability
the environment and society’s failure to accommodate (physically and attitudes) impairments is what creates disability experience
propositions of the social model
- de-medicalizes disability and highlights marginalized groups who are bothered and listens to their voices
- promotes access, equity, social inclusion, sense of community, pride, autonomy, and empowerment
- promotes change in APA practices on structural, attitudinal, and social levels
- focus on collaboration by working with disabled people and highlight their voices with work by disabled people for interdependence between disabled and non-disabled people
dangers of the social model
- individual expeirences underestimated and ignores the diversity of subjective experiences in society
- cannot presume that all activity restrictions have a social basis since restrictions can come from the condition itself
- power imbalance and creation of outsiders from social activism as people are split into who benefits from ableism and who does not
- marginalization within the disabled people’s movement
direct/perception discrimation v. indirect/associated discrimination
- treated unfairly because of disabilty (eg. harassment, exclusion)
- policy or rule that seems fair but actually harms a certain group such as making assumptions of mobility norm and not catering to those who outside of it (eg. not putting accessibilty ramps)
fundamental negative bias and rehabilitation
- devalues disabled experience and considered lesser than non-disabled peers
- disability in rehabilitation is viewed through a Eurocentric fundementally negative view of disability, attitudes of health care professionals is critical since they control access to services and influence public policies
ableism
beliefs or actions based on supremacist hierarchies, favouring non-disabled people; valuing normal capacities and pushing change towards a non-disabled ideal, devaluing and othering those who cannot or do not meet these expectations
disability advocacy
disability is part of the human condition, therefore is a form of diversity with unique perspectives that should be valued and celebrated
WHO International Classification of Function, Disability and Health
1. overview
2. novelty
3. flaws
- framework for measuring health and disability at individual and population levels that equally considers impairments and the environmental contexts that make disability experience intersect the medical and social models of disability following the biopsychosocial model
- explicitly includes the contextual factors that determine disability, client-centred, empower clients by emphasizing goals and activities important to them
- limited personal factors and environmental factors addressed
paternalism and dismantling ableist care
- policies made by people with authority in their subordinate’s best interest but ultimately restrict their freedom
- paternalism is entrenched in physical therapy, can lead to ableist care when setting goals for a plan of care; respect peoples’ decisions for care and collaborate with clients to focus on their goals, and help them navigate the environmental contexts they live in whether they choose to improve their impairment or not