Developmental Psychology: Moral Flashcards
Define: moral reasoning
Reasoning about what constitutes right and wrong that underpins ethical behaviour.
Kohlberg’s theory
1981 - 6 stages
Based on responses of 10, 13 and 16 year old boys to various moral dilemmas.
Define: preconventional morality
Concerned solely with individual and eternal consequences of actions
Haven’t internalised society’s conventions of right/wrong.
Define: conventional morality
Individual tries to obey social rules and laws to maintain social order and be considered a good person.
Define: postconventional morality
Depends on principles of justice beyond conventions and could be in conflict with written laws.
Stage 1
Punishment and obedience
Egocentric
◦ depends on consequences
◦ obey authority to avoid punishment
◦ egocentric
Stage 2
Individual, instrumental and concrete
◦ obeys rules for rewards or desired end
◦ different interests may conflict
◦ instrumental exchange of services, goodwill and fairness
Stage 3
Mutual interpersonal expectations, conformity and relationships
◦ moral behaviour = approved by others or intended to please/help them
◦ follow rules, live up to expectations of others, and maintaining trust, gratitude, respect and loyalty
Stage 4
Social system and maintenance of conscience
◦ considers perspective of society as a whole as reflected in law
◦ doing one’s duty, taking view of system, obeying laws and upholding social order
Stage 5
Rights and social contract
◦ considers laws express viewpoint of mahority and are impartially imposed to be social contracts one is morally obliged to uphold
◦ asserting and integrating basic rights, values and legal contracts
◦ laws as social contracts
Stage 6
Universal ethical principles and moral pov
◦ defines right and wrong on basis of own conscience, applying what they consider to be universal principles of justice
◦ commitment to universal principles of justice
◦ respect for others
Support for theory
Shaffer (1999) - many studies show strong + correlation between age and moral reasoning level
Cross-sectional studies => couldn’t show sequence these were reached was invariant
Ann Colby et al (1983) - followed group of Kohlberg's participants for 20 years ◦ stages occur in proposed order ◦ stage 2 - 20% ◦ stage 3 - 60% ◦ stage 4 - 20%
Criticisms
1) Gender bias
2) Culture bias
Gender bias
◦ Male-oriented view of moral development
◦ Early research => women reached 3, men reached 4
Carol Gilligan (1982)
◦ different socialisation => different values
◦ males => independent and achievement-oriented = justice
◦ females => socially responsible and nurturing = care
◦ Examined moral reasoning of 29 American women, genuine conflict between personal choice and traditional female values of self-sacrifice and care for others
◦ Levels:
1) Self-interest
2) Self-sacrifice
3) Care as universal obligation
Criticism
◦ Durkin (1995) - reviews of many studies => most using Kohlberg’s techniques don’t show sex differences or not always in favours of males if they do.
Culture bias
Cultures and religions have different ideas about what constitutes universal ethical principles
Schweder (1991)
◦ case study with Babaji, orthodox Hindu teacher
◦ Indian version of Heinz dilemma
◦ Hindu dharma (moral duty) forbids stealing under any circumstances
◦ ‘if he steals, it is a sin, so what virtue is there in saving a life?’ - stage 3/4.