Developmental biology 3 (Prof. Dale) Flashcards
What were the 2 theories accounting for tissue formation have proposed by Aristotle (384-322 BCE) ?
Preformation Vs epigenesis
What does preformation theory say ?
Preformation: organs and tissues are preformed and correctly positioned in the fertilised egg. They simply enlarge during embryonic development.
What does epigenesis theory say ?
Epigenesis: organs and tissues are formed gradually, complexity of the embryo increasing with time. Aristotle preferred this explanation.
How did Aristotle provide us with one of the earliest descriptions of embryonic development ?
He cracked open chicken eggs on every day of their 3 week incubation and described the embryos with his naked eye (+subsequently provided 2 explanations for appearance of organs).
What did Antonie van Leeuwenhoek (1632-1723) mean when he said “[…] all manner of great and small vessels, so various and so numerous that I do not doubt that they be nerves, arteries and veins… And when I saw them, I felt convinced that, in no full grown body, are there any vessels which may not be found likewise in semen.” in 1677 ?
Van Leeuwenhoek believed that organs were preformed
in the spermatozoa i.e. he thought he could see a fully formed human (homunculus) in the head of each sperm.
What is the problem of preformation (having organs preformed in either the egg or the spermatozoa) ?
Children inherit characteristics from BOTH parents.
How does the development of the chick embryo provide evidence against preformation (and in favour of epigenesis) ?
Was this evidence widely accepted by the early 18th C. ?
- examining developing chick embryos –> complexity increases with time –> embryo not preformed
- Aristotle could see this without the aid of microscopes
- remarkably, this was not evident to many late 17th/early 18th C. scientists using dyes to stain the embryos and microscopes to see them!
What are the different levels of potency (in decreasing order) that a cell can have ?
Totipotent (all cell types) > pluripotent (cells from 3 germs layers but not extra embryonic tissues) > multipotent > oligopotent > unipotent
What pathway must a totipotent cell follow to become a sk muscle cell ?
Fertilized egg –> ICM –> mesoderm –> somite –> myotome –> sk muscle
What are the 3 different phases of cell commitment ?
What happens during these phases ?
(1) Specification = cells receive instructions on what they are to become but they do not become fully committed –> can be changed experimentally by moving them to a new environment
(2) Determination = cells become fully committed to their fate –> cannot be changed by moving them to a new environment
(3) Differentiation = cells acquire those characteristics that distinguish them from all other cell types –> often involves transcription of tissue-specific genes
What are the 3 major factors that contribute to cell commitment ?
- Localised Determinants
- Embryonic Induction
- Morphogen Gradients
What did Wilhelm Roux (1850-1924) suggest in 1888 concerning localised determinants ?
What theory does this seem to echo ?
- cell fates may be specified by maternal localised determinants, laid down in the cytoplasm of the egg during oogenesis
- each major cell-type having its own determinant
- only cells that inherit the determinant adopt the specified fate
This could look like preformation at the molecular level.
Edwin Conklin (1963-1952) found in 1905 that eggs of the ascidian Styela partita contained a crescent of yellow cytoplasm that was subsequently found in larval muscle cells. What did he suggest concerning this yellow cytoplasm ?
Conklin suggested that this yellow cytoplasm contained a muscle determinant.
Hiroki Nishida and Kaichiro Sawada identified in 2001
macho-1, a maternal mRNA that is localised to blastomeres containing yellow cytoplasm.
What did they find concerning macho-1 ?
What can we therefore say about macho-1 ?
- deleting macho-1 = loss of muscle formation
- injecting macho-1 into a different blastomere = ectopic muscle formation
Macho-1 = a transcription factor that regulates muscle-specific genes (e.g. m-actin, m-myosin, myf, tbx6, snail).
How did Hans Driesch (1867-1941) show in 1893 that sea urchins did not develop using local determinants ?
Driesch dissociated cleavage stage sea urchin embryos –> individual blastomeres formed small but otherwise nearly normal larvae ==> Regulation means that sea urchin eggs cannot be a mosaic of localised determinants