Developmental - Bandura Flashcards
What type of behaviourist theory did ban dura believe in
Social learning theory -
We learn through imitation of those around us
Strength and weakness of behaviourism
Directly observable behaviour less subject to demand characteristics
Used for application - education - teacher should act as a positive role model so children replicate good behaviour
Weakness- much research is on animals e.g skinner pigeons on operant conditioning and classical - pavlova dogs
To simplistic to explain behaviour
Aim of study
To investigate the imitation of aggression between children who witnessed an aggressive role model and those hidden who witnessed a non aggressive role model
What was carried out before the study and why
Observation carried out by experimenters and teach to evaluate children’s level of aggression - n a 5 point rating scale
Physical , verbal, towards inanimate objects, inhibition
To balance out aggression of children in each condition so there wasn’t a group full of naturally aggressive children - affect validity
Participants
72 children
From Stanford university nursery
36 boys and girls
Aged between 3years I month (37 months ) 5years 9 month (69months
Conditions
Aggressive condition
24 children - 6 boys same sex model 6 girls same sex model 6 boys opposite sex model 6 girls opposite sex model
Non aggressive
- 24 children same organisation as aggressive condition
Control 24 children no exposure to any aggression
Iv
Behaviour of model - a na or c
Sex of model
Sex of child
Room 1
Experimental room 10 minutes
Children would play with potato prints adult role model on opposite of the room where there was a table and chair would play with tinker toys e.g. Construction toys and there was a five foot inflatable bobo doll
Aggressive - would play with tt for 1 would be aggressive towards bobo doll
Na - would ignore bobo doll and play with tinker toys nicely
Arousal condition why ?
Ben if there was arousal the children in non aggressive condition would still not show aggressive behaviour emphasising the inhibitory influence of non aggressive model
Mild arousal room
Allowed to play with attractive toys such as fire engines , doll set then after 2 minutes weren’t allowed to play with them they were reserved (better toys) for other children
Gave them something to be aggressive about
Condition 3
Variety of aggressive and non aggressive toys
Bobo doll, dart guns ball hanging from seen, mallet
No non aggressive toys - farm animals crayons etc
20 minutes observed through one way glass time point sample used every 5 seconds note behaviour shown
Measure of imitation
Physical aggression - initiative hitting bobo with mallet
Imitation of verbal aggression hit him down
Imitative non agressive verbal - he keeps coming back for more
Partial imitation -
Mallet aggression - hitting other objects with mallet
Sitting on bobo
Non imitative - verbal shoot the bobo
Agressive gun play
Non agressive measures
Results
Seeing agressive models - a group would shore more aggression = correct - 21.3 aggression na - 7.2
Boys more likely to be agressive
Correct for physical aggression - boys 38.2 girls - 12.7
No difference in verbal agrgression
Influence of sex of model - it’s showed more physical and verbal imitative no non imitative aggression when exposed to make model than girls
Girls showed more imitative verbal aggression with female model and non imitative aggression than boys
Research method
Lab- in manipulated - sex of model , sex of child in each condition , behaviour of model
Controlled setting - had three specific rooms were certain hints happened e.g 1 display of model behaviour 2 arousal 3 observation matched participants
Children were matched into conditions based off of level of aggression previously assessed would control participant variables and increase validity
Data
Quantative - collected results of behaviour from one point sample against behavioural categories - analyse data see if they support hypothesis
Qualitative - comments made by children
E.g this ain’t no way for a lady to behave - shows effect of cultural social norms