Developmental approach Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Bandura - background

learning theories

A
  • bhv is moulded by reinforcement => we do things to avoid unpleasant consequences
  • bhv is the response to stimuli in the env => behaviourist psychologists
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Bandura - background

social learning theory

A
  • learn through observation, when bhv has positive consequences we imitate it
  • children imitate models actions
    => SLT has influenced the media and the effect of tv violence on childrens bhv
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Bandura - background

previous research

A

Bandura & Hudson

=> children readily imitate bhv demonstrated by an adult role model if the model is present

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Bandura - aim

A

to investigate whether learning can occur through observation of a role mode and that imitation of learned behaviour can occur even in the absence of a model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Bandura - Research method

A
Lab experiment 
=> matched participants design 
=> observation 
IV - sex of child & model, bhv of model 
DV - level of aggression shown by kids
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Bandura - sample

A
=> 72 children 
=> avg. age 52 months
=> Stanford Uni nursery
=> equal amount of boys and girls 
=> opportunity sample
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Bandura - matching procedure (exp design)

A
  • kids were pre rated for levels of aggression by nursery teacher and experimenter on 5 point scale
  • scale measured physical & verbal aggression, aggression inhibition
  • children arranged into triplets and assigned at random to a condition
  • inter-rater reli was high between teacher and exp
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Bandura - procedure in a nutshell

A
  • children went into a room full of toys , played for 1min and then role model showed non / aggressive bhv towards bobo doll & repeated this 3 times
  • then all ppts went into a room of attractive toys and after 2 mins the toys were taken away
  • then in room 3 children could play for 20 mins and were observed without their knowledge while experimenter was in the room
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Bandura - results

A

=> children from aggressive condition showed significantly more imitation of physical and verbal aggression .
=> overall boys were more aggressive than girls
=> male model was more influential than female model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Bandura - conclusions

A

=> shows evident that bhv is learnt via observation (SLT)

=> children will imitate behaviours shown by adult models even if they’re not present

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Chaney - Background

operant conditioning + prev research

A

=> OC - learning through consequences of bhvioural responses. bhv thats rewarded likely to be repeated
==> Skinner - + reinforcement of rats: when rewarded with food from a lever they would repeat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Chaney - background

medical background

A

=> rates for compliance of medical regemes for kids was 30 - 70%
=> operant conditioning seen to be effective in medical world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Chaney - aim

A

test whether a funhaler could provide + reinforcement to improve adherence in child asthmatics compared to normal inhalers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Chaney - research method

A

Feld experiment
=> own homes in Perth, AUS
=> repeated measured design
=> self-report used to gather data

IV - standard inhaler, funhaler
DV - amount of adherance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Chaney - sample

A

=> 32 children from Perth
=> 22 male, 10 female
=> all had asthma for avg. 2 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Chaney - funhaler

A

had a whistle and spinner that made a noise when children take deep breaths

17
Q

Chaney - procedure in a nutshell

A
  • parents contacted on the phone & purpose of the study is explained (informed consent)
  • interviewed using closed qaire about child’s usage of inhaler
  • given funhaler for 2 week period, used under adult supervision only
  • parents were phoned randomly during the 2 weeks and were visited at the end for 2nd Qaire
18
Q

Chaney - results

A

=> 81% parents medicated child funhaler prev. day, 59% old inhaler
=> 30% more children took recommended 4 deep breaths with funhaler

19
Q

Chaney - conclusions

A
  • operant conditioning is useful for managing medical regimes
  • self-reinforcement strategies can improved health of kids
20
Q

Kohlberg - background

prev. research

A
  • Piaget => structural approach of moral development
    from Piaget’s research Kohlberg created PIGLSU (development stages)
    => stages are invariant, no stages are skipped , not all ppl reach highest level of moral development
21
Q

Kohlberg - Aim

A
  1. to investigate development of moral reasoning throughout adolescence and early adulthood
  2. asses the extent to which these changes hold true in a range of cultural contexts .
22
Q

Kohlberg - sample

A
  • 75 American boys
  • aged 10 - 16
  • followed every 3 years until ages 22 - 28
    => also studied in boys from GB, Canada, Taiwan, Mexico & Turkey
23
Q

Kohlberg - Research method

A
  • Longitudinal study following same group of boys for 12 years
  • Cross - sectional research conducted in cross cultural study (snapshot)
24
Q

Kohlberg - Procedure in a nutshell

A
  • each boy was presented with hypothetical moral dilemmas every 3 years
  • dilemmas determined the stage of moral development they were in
  • ppts asked what character should do
    Cross cultural study
    => asked about theft of food
25
Q

Kohlberg - results

A

=> cross cultural similarity : always passed through the stages invariantly and never went backwards
=> cross cultural difference : at 16, stage 5 was more prevalent in USA than Mexico whcih was reached later in life

26
Q

Kohlberg - conclusions

A

=> invariant developmental sequence
=> each stage happens one at a time
=> there’s cultural universality of sequence of stages
=> Six stages not sig affected by social, cultural or religious factors. More so by individual diffs.

27
Q

Lee - background

prev. research => Piaget

A
  • involved protagonist having to make decisions on how to act and what to say in different scenarios

=> he found that children don’t use protagonist’s intention as the key factor of moral judgement

28
Q

Lee - background

Prev. research => Wimmer

A
  • disagreed with Piaget
    => found evidence to suggest that children are capable to distinguish lying from other behavioural misdeeds at a young age
29
Q

Lee - background

Prev. research => Sweetser

A
  • lying and truth telling / moral judgement is influence by cultural norms and moral values of a particular society
30
Q

Lee - Aim

A
  • investigate cross-cultural differences in children’s understanding of lying, comparing the responses of Chinese and Canadian kids to stories involving lying and truth telling in pro/antisocial situations
31
Q

Lee - sample

A

120 Chinese children => aged 7,9 or 11

108 Canadian children => aged 7,9, or 11

32
Q

Lee - research method

A

Lab experiment

cross cultural = compare Chinese and Canadian
cross sectional = compare ages
=> independent measures design

33
Q

Lee - procedure in a nutshell

A
  • Chinese & Canadian children randomly assigned to social or physical stories
  • children read 4 scenarios individually
  • instructed about meaning of words and symbols on 7 point rating chart (very good, very naughty)
  • asked “was what they did good or naughty” after scenario
  • then asked again once they lied/ told the truth
34
Q

Lee - findings

cross cultural

A

Cross cultural similarity => both cultures rated anti-social bhv similarly.
truth telling / antisocial was very positive

Cross cultural difference => Canadians rated pro-social lie telling -vely and Chinese rated it +vely

35
Q

Lee - findings

cross sectional

A

Cross sectional diff => Chinese ratings of pro social /lie telling changed from negative to positive as age increased
Canadian ratings of pro social / lie telling negatively but less negatively as age increased

36
Q

Lee - conclusions

A
  1. Moral reasoning can be influenced by culture and society we live in and this is emphasised as we develop through bio stages
  2. Emphasis on modesty in Chinese culture increases with age, which are morals that are embedded as they age .