Development of Theory of Mind Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what is theory of mind?

A
  • The insight that people hold mental states and that govern behaviour
  • mental states - e.g. belief, desire, goals, etc…
  • allow us to make sense of the social world - to predict and explain people’s actions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

desire-based TOM

A
  • people’s desires and idiosyncratic and constantly changing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is belief-based TOM?

A
  • distinction between mind/world
  • requires the notion that a person has a representation of the world, the contents of which may be quite different from the contents of the world itself or from our own beliefs
  • shift from a situation-based to a representation based understanding of behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is a false belief task?

A
  • tests whether child can represent what another person believes in contrast to their own beliefs or reality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Unexpected transfer task also known as the Maxi chocolate task (Wimmer & Perner, 1983)

A
  • while maxi is out pplaying, his mum takes the chocolate from the cupboard and grates some of it into cake
  • Maxi returning from play, feeling hungry. He wants his chocolate
  • TEST Q: where will Maxi look for the chocolate?
  • MEMORY Q: where did Maxi put his chocolate?
  • REALITY Q: Where did Mum put his chocolate?
  • under 5 years judge that maxi will look for the chocolate where he put it
  • over 5 years judge that maxi will look where they will look (the fridge)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

do children understand other people may have desires that differ from theirs?

A
  • 18 months but not 14 months understood that the experimenter’s desired food differed from theirs
  • suggests they understand that desire is a subjective mental state can differ from person to person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the Sally-Ann task? Baron-Cohen, Leslie and Frith (1985)

A
  • unexpected transfer task
  • Sally doll put block in the box and goes away to play
  • Doll Anne put the block in the basket while Sally was away
  • child asked when sally comes back inside where they think sally will look for the block
    -children younger than 4 do not pass the unexpected transfer test
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Perner et al. (1987), Gopnik and Astington (1988) descriptive box test

A
  • what is inside this tube (guess) (they think smarties)
  • what is in it? (see) (actually saw a pencil)
  • what will your friend XXX say is inside the tube
  • 3-4 years old have difficulty acknowledging false belief in others and own prior false belief once they know what is inside
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

ToM revealed in natural conversion

A

Me: I wonder if bunny ate all her cookie.
Maya (2y4m): No, bunny not got cookie, Moz got cookie.
Me: Ok.. Let’s go to your room to see.
Me: (on entering M’s room) Look, bunny has the cookie. I was right!
Maya: Yeah. I thought Moz got the cookie!
→ i.e. Spontaneously reflected on her own previous false belief

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Wllman, Cross & Watson, 2001

A
  • meta-analysis of 178 studies
  • support for substantial developmental effect over preschool years
  • below 3.5 years below chance performance
  • above 4 years above chance
  • found that task/question, nature of protagonist/object was irrelevant
  • descriptive motive, active participation and salience of mental state improve performance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How do we KNOW that 3 year olds don’t have ToM?

A
  • lack of positive evidence doesn’t necessarily mean lack of competence
  • performance limitations masking children’s competence?
  • problem with language?
    → temporal marking
    → test question - “where will maxi look first of all?” (siegal and Beattie, 1991)
    → story comprehension (Lewis et al. 1994)
  • simplifying the task improves but not dramatically
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

universality: Cross cultural comparisons (Callaghan et al. 2005)

A

Despite leading very different lives children in industrialized societies and those in more rural societies show similar developmental shift between 3 and 5 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what factors contribute to ToM development?

A
  1. Role of social experience in aiding understanding of mental states –arises from interactions from other people
  2. Biological maturation enables children to express their understanding of mental states – arises from improvement in executive functioning
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Role of experience Harris (1999)

A
  • Conversations in general are crucial for exposing children to other people’s perspectives
  • They provide children with the vocabulary needed to discuss and reflect on mental states
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Role of experience further studies

A
  • Children with older siblings show earlier ToM (Perner, Ruffman, & Leekham, 1994; Ruffman, Perner, Naito, Parkin, & Clements,1998)
  • Children whose parents talk about mental states more understand false belief earlier than other children (Dunn et al., 1991; Meins et al 2002; Ruffman, Slade, & Crowe, 2002)
  • Deaf children of hearing parents show a developmental lag on FB tasks (Peterson & Siegel, 1995)
  • In contrast, deaf children of signing parents are comparable with hearing children (Peterson & Siegal, 1999)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Theory of Min scale Wellman and Liu (2004)

A
  • Diverse Desires: people can have different desires for the same thing
  • Diverse Beliefs: people can have different beliefs about the same situation
  • Knowledge-access: something can be true, but someone might not know that
  • False Belief: something can be true, but someone might falsely believe something different
  • Hidden Emotion: Someone can feel one way but display a different emotion
14
Q

what is the role of executive functioning?

A
  • children’s failure on ToM tasks may stem not from pure conceptual limitations but rather from problems translating conceptual knowledge into successful action
  • critical role of executive function in ability to pass ToM tasks
15
Q

Executive functions

A
  • a set of domain-general cognitive abilities that help us to control and guide our attention and behaviour
    1. inhibition
    2. cognitive flexibility
    3. working memory
16
Q

what is inhibition?

A
  • ignoring distracting information or suppressing unwanted responses
    real life:
  • stop yourself reaching for the bar of chocolate
  • ignoring text messages/email alerts when trying to work
    In the lab:
  • bear/dragon task (like simon says, children introduced to 2 characters, bear told nice and kind and do what the dragon asks you to do, the dragon is evil so ignore what the dragon says. if said by the bear to it, ignore instructions from the dragon)
  • stroop diagram
17
Q

what is cognitive flexibility?

A
  • respond to the same thing in different ways depending on the context
    Real life:
  • multiple passwords/pin numbers
  • up vs down in lift
  • alarm on vs off
    in the lab:
  • wisconsin card sorting test
  • task-switching paradigm
18
Q

what is working memory?

A
  • holding important information or your ‘goal’ in the mind
    real life:
  • Mental shopping list
  • Mental arithmetic
    in the lab:
  • digit span
  • spatial span
19
Q

what are some biological constraints of executive functions to explain ToM?

A
  • frontal lobes of the brain are very important for executive functions
  • they take a long time to develop
  • important developments in inhibitory control (IC) take place in the first 6 years of life, with marked improvement between age 3 and 6 (Diamond and Taylor, 1996)
20
Q

what is the role of executive function in false belief task?

A
  • evidence of string positive correlation between children’s inhibitory control (e.g. on Bear/Dragon task) and false belief performance
  • suggests that: development in inhibitory control and theory of mind may be related
  • Inhibitory control may be crucial enabling factor ToM development, possibility affecting both the emergence and expression of mental state knowledge
21
Q

what is explicit knowledge?

A
  • knowledge easily accessible to the child
  • measure via elicited response, e.g. verbal answer to a question
22
Q

what is implicit knowledge?

A
  • knowledge the child is unaware of
  • measure via spontaneous response e.g.:
    → emotional response
    → anticipatory looking
    → violation of expectancy
23
Q

implicit understanding of false belief, Moll et al. (2016)

A
  • investigated children’s facial expressions as indicies of their belief understanding
  • predicts that if 3 YOS percieve the conflict between a person’s belief and reality, they will show signs of suspense (e.g. lip biting and brow furrowing) when observing an actor about to act on basis of their false belief
  • Found greater instances of expressed tension in the false belief cf. true belief condition
    → Suggests 3 yos expressed knowledge of another’s false belief and recognised the affective consequences of the false belief
  • In contrast, children’s performance on a classic FB task was poor and unrelated to the amount of expressions they displayed while watching the FB videos
    →suggests expressions are independent from and emerge prior to explicit knowledge of false beliefs.
24
Q

implicit understanding of false belief, (Clements and Perner, 1994)

A
  • Aim: to get evidence for a period of implicit understanding of FB that precedes the onset of explicit understanding
  • Method: Tested 44 children aged 2y5m – 4y6m on ‘unexpected transfer task’
  • implicit measure was anticipatory looking
  • explicit measure: standard verbal response
  • 86% children over 2y11m showed looking pattern indicative of FB understanding
  • only 1 child under 2y11m
25
Q

what is anticipatory looking paradigm?

A
  • used to determine if infants can predict events in the world
  • measure the direction of an infant/child’s first look after an event
  • participants’ looking behaviour is analysed to determine if they correctly expect/anticipate what will happen next
  • requires prediction (cf. with VOE, which relied on reactive looking)
25
Q

even earlier false belief understanding in infancy, Onishi and Baillargeon (2005)

A
  • used a totally nonverbal task to test for implicit false belief understanding in 15-month-old-infants
  • violation of expectancy method
  • is an infant looked longer at inconsistent event taken as evidence that are surprised
  • indicating they have some level of knowledge about what should happen
26
Q

w

A