Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Cognitive > Determinants of selective attention > Flashcards

Determinants of selective attention Flashcards

1
Q

What determines what we pay attention to?

A

Top down goals eg. looking for taxi or looking for a friend

“Bottom up” stimulus characteristics

Physical properties of the things around us – e.g. signs here designed to get our attention

But our attention could go involuntarily to other things eg. a sign

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why do we need involuntary attention?

A

Imagine if you can go to a library and completely focus

We need involuntary attention because we can’t predict what might happen- eg. if hit by a book it will allow you to duck

We have to prioritise info without having already known what might happen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Key vocab

A

Bottom up- driven by stimulus
- Stimulus-driven
- Exogenous
These 3 mean a similar thing and are grouped by:
- Involuntary attention
- Reflexive attention

Top down
- Goal-driven
- Endogenous
These are also grouped together and people sometimes refer to them as attentional/ executive/ voluntary
- Attentional control
- Executive attention
- Voluntary attention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Biased Competition Theory Desimone & Duncan (1995)

What does the model look like?

A

Top-down attentional control mechanisms
| (goes down to)
Competition among multiple stimuli for representation
| (goes up to)
Bottom-up sensory-driven mechanisms sensitive to stimulus salience

-> Output to response & memory systems

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Biased Competition Theory Desimone & Duncan (1995)
What gets selected and explaining theories?

A

Having two things going on eg. top down focusing on taxis and sign having bottom-up signal

The winner between these 2 gets selected

This idea that our attention is influenced by both top-down and bottom up underlies many of the current theories of selective attention. For example, biased comp. However, there is some disagreement between the respective roles.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What kind of stimuli can “capture” our attention?

A
  • Stimuli of high salience
  • Movement/ ‘abrupt onset’ (suddenly appear)
  • Things that are relevant to us/relate to our values
  • Or…none? Is stimulus-driven attentional capture not possible?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Salient colour singletons

A

“odd one out”

salience- how much something stands out

Red apple attracts our attention due to being different from the others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Salient ‘singletons’ Theeuwes (1992)

Singleton Attentional Capture Task

  1. Task
  2. Result
  3. Can top-down mechanisms focus attention only on shapes?
A
  1. Find circle
  2. Colour “singleton” increases search RTs
  3. Theeuwes’ interpretation: complete top-down selectivity not possible
    Even though you were looking for shapes, your attention was distracted by colour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Theeuwes: Stimulus-driven selection
Bottom-up BEFORE top-down

Traditional two-stage approach to attention

A

‘Pre attentive’ analysers -> (bottom up) -> selection (top down modulation?) -> output to response & memory systems

Top down modulation only comes in at selection step

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Saliency map (e.g. Koch & Ullman, 1985)

A

E.g. Surf line well-represented as it contrasts in terms of intensity, orientation, colour

Things in lighter colours are more salient (stand out more)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Theeuwes: Stimulus-driven selection
Bottom-up BEFORE top-down

First stage and Second stage

A

First stage:
- Initial sweep across visual field, entirely bottom-up
- Calculation of local salience
(How much does this differ from surrounding image attributes along some dimension such as colour, shape, luminance, size etc?)
- Attention → location with highest local feature contrast or salience

Second stage:
- Is selected item target? If not location inhibited.
- Attention then shifts to item that is next in line with respect to salience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Theewes: Stimulus-driven selection
Bottom-up BEFORE top-down

Describe new model

A

Calculation of local salience -> most salient item selected -> is this what I was looking for (top-down modulation?) NO = Bottom-up input back to start, YES= Output to response & memory systems

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
  1. Where does stimulus-driven selection only take place?
  2. _____ vary size of ______ ?
A
  1. Within attentional window
  2. Spatial cues can vary size of attentional window
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The attentional window example

A

If you’re in times square if you know you’re looking for taxis and they are at the bottom of the road, a sign won’t capture your attention because even though its salient, its not in your attentional window

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
  1. what does not capture atttention?
A

Singletons outside cued location do not capture attention (e.g. Theeuwes, 1991)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Contingent capture
Folk & Remington (1992)

  1. ________ NOT _______
  2. What can attention only be captured by?
  3. Although….
A
  1. Attentional capture NOT stimulus-driven
  2. Attention can only be captured by stimuli relevant to our goals
  3. Although in some cases this relevance may be less obvious
17
Q

Contingent attention capture

Times square example

A

Does the yellow sign capture our attention because it is salient, or because we were looking for a yellow taxi?

Brain was looking for something yellow so went to the sign

18
Q

Contingent capture
Folk & Remington (1992)

What does the task involve?

A

Task: Is target = or X

  • Cues valid or invalid
  • Cue might appear which shows location target will appear (valid) or direct you to the wrong location (invalid)
  • Target defined by onset
  • Measuring how slowed down we are see whether our attention is cued
  • Target defined by unique onset or colour
  • Cue also defined by either onset or colour
  • Seeing would particular cues only distract you depending on what you’re looking for
19
Q

Contingent capture
Folk & Remington (1992)

Results

A
  • Invalid cues produced slower RTs… attentional capture
  • BUT this was contingent on relation to task:

–Colour cues capture attention when target was defined on colour
–Onset cues captures attention when target was defined on onset
–But not vice versa….
–Suggests attentional capture contingent on task goals

20
Q

Theeuwes’ colour singleton was irrelevant to task

A

Target was defined by shape – therefore colour should be irrelevant
However this was contradicted by Bacon & Egeth (1994)

21
Q

Bacon & Egeth (1994)
Task and results

A
  • Search for singleton shape singleton detection search strategy
  • i.e. “spot the odd one out”
  • Therefore, singleton colour IS relevant to top down goals

Expt: Shape target no longer singleton
Result: Colour singleton no longer interferes

22
Q

Theeuwes (2004)
1. What did Bacon & Egeth’s task show in relation to local salience of singleton
2. What interferes when target non-singleton
3. IF…

A
  1. Bacon & Egeth’s task reduced local salience of singleton
  2. Colour singleton DOES interfere when target non-singleton…
  3. …IF local salience is maintained
23
Q

What is abrupt onset?
What is the theory?

A

Abrupt onset = something which suddenly appears

Another theory: Only abrupt onsets can produce stimulus driven capture

24
Q

Abrupt onsets (Yantis and colleagues)

Task and results

A

Task: Is there an S present?

Result:
- Singleton was not predictive of target location
- And could be either colour singleton, or onset
- Onsets produced attentional capture
- …but colour singletons didn’t

stimulus driven capture might be possible but for less things

25
Q

Why might it be important to detect abrupt onset?

A

Safety
Perhaps if you don’t have the ability to notice new things that suddenly appear and potentially react to them, you might get eaten by a lion.

26
Q

Franconeri & Simons (2003)

A
  • Moving or looming stimuli also capture attention
  • But receding stimuli don’t
  • Note- in these tasks the targets appear as OFFSETS
  • So onsets should be irrelevant to top-down goals… or are they?
27
Q

Display-wide settings: Another argument against stimulus-driven capture (Gibson & Kelsey, 1998)

A
  • Attention tasks usually begin with some kind of change to display
  • E.g. Task stimuli onset, or offset, or change colour etc
  • This may induce general “display-wide” settings for dynamic changes… (maybe people were waiting for a change on the computer to happen, so any change that happens would be relevant to your goal)

…including onsets!

  • It’s hard to think of any experimental task not involving any change to the display!
28
Q

Attentional capture: beyond physical salience
How can things seem to attract attention?

A

Sometimes things seem to attract attention because of their meaning (e.g. threat)
…or personal relevance

29
Q

Attentional capture: beyond physical salience
Purkis, Lester & Field (2011):

A
  • Spider-phobics showed attentional capture by spiders
  • But Doctor Who fans showed attentional capture by Doctor Who images
30
Q

Familiarity/expertise can influence attention

A

Experts in American football faster to notice changes in football related images (Werner & Thies, 2010)

Expert musicians more distracted by musical instruments (Ro, Friggel & Lavie, 2009)

More recent theories highlight role of ‘selection history’ or reward associations.- history we have with particular things

31
Q

Stimuli associated with value capture attention:
What was Andersons’ idea?

A

Put forward this idea that reward might be a third determinant of attention.

32
Q

Anderson (2013)

Test and results

A

He tested this by training people to associate a colour with a reward (money)

Then they have a distractor phase- there are reward singletons- you’re looking for a shape and there is a distractor that has been associated with a reward

Found- People were distracted by reward the same way as they had been distracted by colour singletons

This goes with the idea that reward can factor attention

He suggested that value is a third determinant of attention

33
Q

What conclusion was made?

A

“the fact that the existing models can all be captured within a single diagram is significant process”

34
Q

Model with sensory register, feature maps, saliency computations and control state

A

dotted line is like stuff they disagree on and not dotted line and stuff they agree on.

There’s more agreement about How you can allocate attention to space (to different locations).

35
Q

What might attention be determined by?

A

–Top-down goals

–‘Bottom-up’ properties of the stimuli

–Value/Selection History

Cognitive (22 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions